News Update

DRI nabs Dubai-bound pax with FC worth Rs 1.93 croresCX - Too late for Revenue to complain that there is non-compliance by Settlement Commission with mandatory provisions of law: High CourtI-T - Tax Recovery Officer cannot summarily assume powers under Indian Contract Act, 1872, to suo motu declare a transaction of sale to be void & without approaching civil court: HCI-T - Expenses incurred for purely business purposes not being incurred on employees, would not attract Fringe Benefit Tax: HCCX - General practice amongst masses to not consider trading as an 'exempted service' till amendment was made in CCR - assessee had no malafide intention to avail undue benefit: CESTATCJI impeachment - Opposition Parties finally do it; hands over Notice to Vice PresidentBRICS discusses constitution of Working Group on illicit financial flowsCBDT shifts DGHRD office to Jawaharlal Nehru StadiumCBIC clarifies that remnant fuels (HSD/LDO) (after ship breaking) are classifiable under Chapter 27 and free from import policy restrictionsI-T - Mere projection of profit statement found in loose sheets from taxpayer's premises, is no basis for levying penalty in his hands: ITATGoM on Transport recommends uniform road tax structureCX - Assessee taking credit on rejected goods, recyling same and paying duty on clearance alleging that credit has been availed irregularly is unsubstantiated no question of double duty : CESTATGovt seeks feedback to Draft Coastal Regulation ZoneI-T - Payments made to founder or relative of trust, if credited to trust's account immediately without taking any undue benefit from it, will not upset exemption benefit u/s 11: ITATFC to individually assess needs of each State: NK SinghCX Mere reiteration of order of penalty imposed by original authority, who had jurisdiction, by first appellate authority, who lacked jurisdiction, does not cause grievance to appellant at that stage: CESTATGoM on Transport recommends uniform road tax and national permits for buses and taxisJustice Loya death case - SC dismisses pleasChennai Customs nabs pax coming from Dubai with gold worth Rs 2.5 Cr + also seizes 7.5 kg of seahorses during vehicle checkGovt to give new award to certain ranks of Civil servantsVAT - Reimbursement received by dealer for supply of spare parts to its customers under warranty period, are not liable to VAT under Maharashtra VAT Act: HCIT - Where Revenue detects massive tax evasion through bogus bills, it cannot wash hands of it through mere additions: ITATIT - Failure to explain scientific method in determining the amount of performance bonus payable to employees can lead to its disallowance : ITATST - Demand of differential amount of service tax alleging that entire amount collected by PCO operator is subject to levy of service tax cannot sustain for period prior to 01.03.2011: CESTATIndia almost ready with Rs 600 Crore Chandrayaan-2Govt launches Study in India Portal for foreign studentsAfter issuance of SCN, write to noticees about availing window of Settlement Commission for early settlement of disputes - CBIC instructs fieldCBDT Diktat on Misconduct - But, Mr Prime Minister, Actual High-handedness lies in Revenue Target Fixation!

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES
NEW DELHI

CIRCULAR NO

1/2018, Dated: January 10, 2018

Order under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Subject: Processing of income-tax returns under section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act which were filed in Forms ITR-1 to 6 & applicability of section 143(l)(a)(vi)-reg.-

Sub-clause (vi) of clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 143 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('Act') as introduced vide Finance Act, 2016, w.e.f. 01.04.2017, while processing the return of income, prescribes that the total income or loss shall be computed after making adjustment for addition of income appearing in Form 26AS or Form 16A or Form 16 (the three Forms) which has not been included in computing the total income in the return. In this regard, CBDT has issued Instruction No.(s) 9/2017 dated 11.10.2017 & 10/2017 dated 15.11.2017 for identification of instances in which section 143(l)(a)(vi) of the Act may be invoked by CPC-ITR, Bengaluru on the basis of information contained in the ITR Forms 1 to 6.

2. As intimations proposing adjustments in identified returns under section 143(1)(a)(vi) of the Act would be shortly issued by the CPC-ITR, Bengaluru, the process to be followed by the taxpayers for filing the response is as under:

2.1 Since section 143(l)(a)(vi) of the Act is being applied for the first time while processing the returns, it has been decided that before issuing an intimation of the proposed adjustment, initially an awareness campaign would be carried out to draw the attention of the taxpayer to such differences. This would be in form of an e-mail and SMS communication to the concerned taxpayer informing him about the variation in the tax-return vis-a-vis the information available in the three Forms and requesting him to submit response to the variation within one month of receiving the connmunication electronically. In case the taxpayer does not respond within the available time-frame or the response is not satisfactory, a formal intimation u/s 143(l)(a)(vi) proposing adjustment to the returned income would be issued to him. As per the second proviso to section 143(l)(a)(vi) of the Act, in a case where no response is received from the taxpayer within thirty days of issue of such an intimation, the proposed adjustment shall be made to the returned income. Therefore, it is of utmost necessity that the concerned taxpayer files a prompt, timely and satisfactory response to the awareness campaign or subsequent intimation proposing adjustment u/s 143(1)(a)(vi) of the Act.

2.2 The manner for furnishing response by the taxpayer is as under:

For furnishing the response electronically, taxpayer is required to login in his account in the e-filing site and choose the option (View-Returns/Forms). In a case where communication/intimation has been issued to the taxpayer u/s 143(1)(a)(vi) of the Act, the status will be displayed in the dashboard as 'Response to Communication/Intimation u/s 143(1)(a) is pending'. The taxpayer can click on the same and submit his response.

2.3 The scenario(s) for furnishing response are as under:

I. Where upon receiving the awareness message or formal intimation u/s 143(l)(a)(vi) of the Act, if the taxpayer fully agrees with the proposed adjustment, he is required to file a revised return in response.

II. Where upon receiving the awareness message or formal intimation u/s 143(l)(a)(vi) of the Act, if the taxpayer partially agrees with the proposed adjustment, he is required to (i) file a revised return for the part of the proposed adjustment with which he is in agreement & (ii) file a reconciliation statement (in the format to be provided by CPC-ITR on the e-filing site) for the part of the proposed adjustment with which he is not in agreement.

III. Where upon receiving the awareness message or formal intimation u/s 143(l)(a)(vi) of the Act, the taxpayer disagrees with the proposed adjustment, he is required to file a reconciliation statement (in the format to be provided by CPC-ITR on the e-filing site) in support of his contention.

3. Based upon response of the taxpayer as indicated in para 2.3 above and the information so available with the CPC-ITR, thereafter, such returns shall be taken up for processing by CPC-ITR as per provisions of section(s) 143(1), 143(l)(a)(vi) read with Instruction No.s 9 & 10/2017 of CBDT.

4. Hindi version to follow.

[F.No.225/333/2017-ITA-II]

Rohit Garg
Director - (ITA.II), CBDT