News Update

Vizag DRI sleuths seize 1161 kg Ganja concealed under gravel material being transported by lorryBefore GST roll-out Union of India to scrap 16 Cesses of Excise and Service Tax; to cost Rs 65,000 Crore to ExchequerPMs constituency Varanasi to host third G-20 Framework Working Group meeting on WednesdayIndian Navy to de-induct Long-Range Maritime Patrol Aircraft after 29 yearsCBI Court convicts former Oriental Bank Manager & othersST - Claim for exclusion of amounts on basis of acting as pure agent can be made only if all conditions for such concept are fulfilled: CESTATCBEC to be renamed as CBIC; to have 101 GST Commissionerates, including 50 Appeals CommissioneratesApplications invited for First Secretary (Legal) at PMI at WTO, GenevaPangs of GST - Govt sets up Working Groups to address peculiar problems of industryCX - Annual Production Capacity - Actual Production vs deemed production - Legal Fiction vs Presumption - Supreme Court refers matter to Larger BenchCBDT directs officers to grant interest waiver in certain casesOROP - Pension to be reviewed every 5 yearsIncome Tax searches lead to seizure of Rs 3625 CroreUnclaimed Deposits in Banks & Insurance Companies exceed Rs 8000 CroreCST compensation to States: Centre to release Rs 5834 Crore before Mar 31CCI imposes Rs 51K penalty on Kerala MP heading film association as PresidentCX - Any relief under doctrine of promissory estoppel can be enforced only in hands of Courts - Tribunal cannot arrogate to itself such powers: CESTAT4.5% Indians suffer from depression: MinisterDelhi Insurance Ombudsman Office gets ISO certificationCommissionerates fail to pay court fee stamp - CBEC releases ListGST Bills copies being printed; to be tabled on MondayTrump's attempt to substitute Obamacare failsGovt approves nine FDI proposals involving proposal worth Rs 659 CroreCustoms Duty on Sunflower seeds (1206 0090) for the purpose of extraction and refining of oil reduced to 10% for the period 1st April 2017 to 30th September 2017GST high on Alcohol Manufacturing IndustrySFO in UK doing well to deal with foreign bribery casesIndian Cement Industry accounts for only 7% of global needsI-T - Excess stock found during survey which did not belong to assessee but to its Karta in his individual capacity, cannot be added to assessee's closing stockCX - It is 'nature of order' of Tribunal and not 'scope of appeal' that determines maintainability: HCCus - DRI officials at wedding premises - Calling payments as voluntary is turning a blind eye to harsh realities: HCST - Since CESTAT has remanded matter, it cannot be said that any substantial question of law would arise for consideration: HC
Untitled Document

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES
NEW DELHI

CIRCULAR NO

11/2017, Dated: March 24, 2017

Order under Section 119(2)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Subject: Guidelines for waiver of interest charged under section 201(1A) (i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

In exercise of the powers conferred under clause (a) of sub-section (2) of section 119 of Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act), Central Board of Direct Taxes (the Board), hereby directs that the Chief Commissioner of Income-tax and Director General of Income-tax may reduce or waive interest charged under section 201(1A) (i) of the Act in the classes of cases specified in paragraph 2 of this Order for the period and to the extent the Chief Commissioner of Income-tax/Director General of Income-tax may deem fit. However, no reduction or waiver of such interest shall be ordered unless the principal demand under sections 200A, 201(1) or 234E, as the case may be, stands fully paid or satisfactory arrangements for payment of the principal demand under these sections have been made. The Chief Commissioner of Income-tax or Director General of Income-tax may also impose any other condition as deemed fit for the said reduction or waiver of interest.

2. The class of cases in which the reduction or waiver of interest under section 201(1A) (i) can be considered, are as follows:

(i) Where during the course of proceedings for search and seizure under section 132 of he Income-tax Act, or otherwise, the books of account and other documents necessary for making deduction under Chapter XVIIB of the Act were seized and the assessee was not able to, within the time specified, deduct tax at source from any sum credited to any account (whether called "suspense account" or by any other name) in his books of accounts.

(ii) Where any sum paid or payable was not liable for deduction of tax at source in the case of a deductor on the basis of any order passed by the jurisdictional High Court, and as a result, he did not deduct tax at source in relation to such sum, and subsequently, in consequence of any retrospective amendment of law or a decision of the Supreme Court of India or a decision of a Larger Bench of the jurisdictional High Court (which was not challenged before the Supreme Court and has become final) in any proceedings, as the case may be, tax was held to be deductible or the tax deducted by the deductor during such financial year was found to be less than the tax deductible on such sums paid or payable.

(iii) Where the default under section 201 relates to non-deduction or a lower deduction of tax under section 195 of the Act in respect of a payment made to a non-resident (including a foreign company) being a resident of a country or specified territory outside India with whom India has entered into an agreement referred to in section 90 or 90A of the Act, and where -

(e) a dispute regarding the tax payable in India in respect of the said payment had been referred to the Competent Authority in India mentioned in Rule 44H of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 under the said agreement under section 90 or 90A of the Act;

(f) such reference had been received by the Competent Authority in India within a period of two years of the date on which the notice of demand determining the tax payable was received by the person in default under section 201;

(g) the dispute has been settled by way of a resolution arrived at under the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) provided in the said agreement; and

(h) the person in default under section 201 has given his acceptance to the resolution and has withdrawn his appeal(s) pending on the issue, within the meaning of sub-rule (4) of Rule 44H of the Income-tax Rules, within a period of one month of the date on which the resolution is communicated to him.

3. Even if the interest u/s 201(1A) (i) has already been paid by the deductor, the same can be considered for waiver, subject to the conditions above and a refund may be given to the deductor. if waiver is ordered.

4. The Chief Commissioner of Income-tax or Director General of Income-tax examining an application for waiver of interest under this Order shall pass a speaking order after providing adequate opportunity of being heard to the applicant.

5. The Board reserves the power to examine any grievance arising out of an order passed or not passed by Chief Commissioner of Income-tax or Director General of Income-tax, as the case may be, and issue suitable directions to these authorities for proper implementation of this Order. However, no review of or appeal against the orders passed on merits by such authorities would be entertained by the Board.

Hindi version follows.

F.No.275/56/2016-IT (B)

(Sandeep Singh)
Under Secretary to the Govt. of India