News Update

Govt hikes retirement age of Ayush doctors & civilian docs of Armed Forces to 65Govt hikes retirement age of Ayush doctors & civilian docs of Armed Forces to 65Defence Accounts Service officer Ms Swaranashree Rao appointed as Spokesperson for Ministry of DefenceDirect tax collections peak at Rs 6.9 lakh cr after refund of Rs 1.2 lakh crPadmavat film maker moves Apex Court against ban by some StatesGovt decides to reduce quantum of borrowing from Rs 50K Crore to only Rs 20K Crore after review of revenue collections trendA nuanced approach to Works Contract under GST (See 'TOG Insight' in - When court finds that assessee has not truly disclosed all facts in case & now wants to withdraw soiled petition, liberty to file fresh petition can only be granted if Revenue is compensated for suffering costs on account of assessee's mistake - YES: HCGovt to strike off fresh lot of 1.2 lakh shell companies from RoC RegisterGST Council to rationalise tax rates on many goods & Services tomorrowCX - Outdoor Catering Services is a necessity but once said service is excluded, the use of such service, whether statutorily required or otherwise, does not render the services eligible for CENVAT: CESTATI-T - When agreement is all about purchase of developed residential sites, merely because developer had to construct some common facilities before the handover, it would amount to 'works contract' - NO: ITATCII demands C Form be continued till Petroleum & Natural Gas brought under GSTCentral Advisory Board favours online education & more autonomy for quality institutesHelpdesk should respond on time and give correct guidanceCacophony against amending Constitution is Music for the IgnorantFirst course on Sustainable Urban Planning launchedScience & technology to be harnessed for preservation of environment: Dr Harsh VardhanMilk production registers 20% growthSteel Industry seeks removal of Customs duty on raw materialsFake encounter - SC asks SIT to wrap up probe in 12 FIRs by Feb-endHaryana also bans release of ‘Padmavat’I-T - When doings of assessee are not found to be not above board, it does not deserve invocation of extraordinary jurisdiction of HC under Art 226: HCPublic art should be part of urban planning: PuriGSTN technical glitches to be reviewed by Sushil Modi-headed Committee tomorrowCX - Without canteen, factory would not be allowed to operate under Factories Act, 1948 - Outdoor catering services, not primarily for personal use or consumption of employee, is covered under definition of Input service: CESTATCENVAT - Services of merger has no relation with manufacture - Even if order goes beyond the SCN, same is not an error of a kind which can be rectified by a ROM application: CESTAT

Clear Float Glass imported from Pakistan, Saudi Arabia & UAE to attract anti-dumping duty; HC stay on Notification withdrawn



1/2018-Customs (ADD); Dated: January 12, 2018

G.S.R. 23(E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) read with rules 18, 20, 22 and 23 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, and in view of the Final Order dated 06.11.2017 of the Hon'ble Madras High Court in respect of Writ Petition No. 12950 of 2017 = 2017-TIOL-2390-HC-MAD-CUS, the Central Government hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 30/2017-Customs (ADD), dated the 16th June, 2017, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), dated the 16th June, 2017 vide number G.S.R. 597(E), dated the 16th June, 2017 namely:-

In the said notification, for para 3 the following shall be substituted:
"3. And whereas the Hon'ble High Court vide its Final Order dated the 6th November, 2017 has ordered that "The Writ Petitions are dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioners to avail the alternate remedy available to them under the Customs Tariff Act, as against the notification dated the 16th June, 2017, with a direction to the first Respondent to forthwith give effect to the notification"

4. Now, therefore, in view of the final order of Hon'ble High Court, the order keeping the notification No. 30/2017, dated the 16th June, 2017 in abeyance stands withdrawn and the notification is given effect to."

[F. No. 354/46/2014-TRU]

(Ruchi Bisht)
Under Secy.