Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com HRindiaonline.com
 
LOGIN
Forgot Password |  Register
Tuesday , June 30, 2015 | Updated : Jun 30, 19:38 IST
Income Tax    Customs    Excise    Service Tax    FEMA    DGFT    SEZ    Misc    Pitara    Budget   
About Us Contact Us Advertise
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com
 
Intuit
 
NEWS FLASH
 
CBEC reduces tariff value across the board, including that of gold and silver (See 'What's New') ACC okays several JS-level Appointments, including that of two IRS officers (See 'Mixed Buzz') CBDT issues Addl Charge order for CCITs (See 'Service News' in Pitara) CBDT promotes 23 CCITs as Principal CCITs (See 'Promotion' in Pitara) Coal Scam: Former MoS(Coal) says all decisions relating to allocation of coal blocks were taken by Dr Manmohan Singh Committee of Secretaries recommends Najib Shah's name for CBEC New Chairman + two names for posts of Members Bombay HC permits Nestle to export Maggi Noodles CX - Availment of fraudulent CENVAT credit of Rs.5.64 crores without receipt of inputs & showing purported clearance of inputs as such - it cannot be said that credit has been reversed as buyers would have taken credit - Pre-deposit ordered of 7.5%: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') I-T - Whether if property is sold under duress at lesser value as it was under litigation, provisions of Sec 50C cannot be mechanically applied to tax capital gains - YES: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') What GST brought to Malaysia(See 'DDT' Column) Proposed GST scenario for State of Jammu & Kashmir (See 'ST se GST tak' Column) ST - Construction Service - Notification 1/2006 - There is no specific bar in notification to disallow CENVAT credit of tax paid on Input services for previous period - Tax paid on Input services received prior to 01.03.2006 and credit taken on 01.04.2006 is legal and proper: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') It is unfortunate that law enforcing/implementing agency chooses to ignore the law; somehow deny refund, without even considering legal options (See 'DDT') CENVAT - Rule 4 - C.I.Moulds were not in possession and use of appellant in subsequent year as same were rendered as scrap and cleared from factory - balance 50% of credit on said capital goods is not available and has been correctly denied: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Question of eligibility of CENVAT Credit while claiming Rebate? (See 'DDT') Arvind Panagariya says Indian economy to be worth USD 3 trillion in 5 years DGFT revamps official website and launches mobile app Govt keen to open up legal sector to foreign firms CBI books Gurgaon-based company for taking PSB for a ride (See 'Mixed Buzz') Greece crisis may lead to fund outflows from India, says Finance Secretary IPL betting: Delhi Court to deliver decision on July 25 Order passed by 'Designated authority' under VCES is appealable under Section 85 of Finance Act, 1994: High Court (See 'Breaking News') Beggar Thy Neighbour - Great Depression ahead? - RBI clarifies (See 'DDT' Column) Income tax - Whether fact that objects of assessee trust may be hit by proviso to Sec 2(15), can have any bearing on grant of registration u/s 12AA - NO: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') With Monsoon Tail Wind, will GST Bill sail through? (See 'Guest' Column) Suppression of facts - SCN issued after a period of two and half years after assessee had voluntarily disclosed their affairs is not barred by limitation - High Court upholds order of Tribunal (See 'Breaking News') Telangana wants back Rs. 1274 crores taken away from RBI by Income Tax Department (See 'DDT') Whether if writ petition has been allowed and assessee was permitted to file its objections before authority concerned, is there any justification on part of Writ Court for giving direction for making deposit of 10% of tax amount - NO: HC (See '2015-TIOL-1507-HC') Uniform Allowance Taxable? (See 'DDT') I-T- Whether if assessee falls within first proviso to sec 2(15), benefit of registration which flow from sec.12A, would still be available to it - NO: ITAT (See '2015-TIOL-941-ITAT') Cairn Energy's Arbitration Plea rejected - Taxation Outside Arbitration (See 'DDT') PM calls for Second Green Revolution; lays down foundation stone for Agri Research Institute in Jharkhand RBI Dy Governor R Gandhi says banks are easy prey to fraudsters Mumbai empty local train rams into platform at Churchgate station CBEC reduces tariff value across the board, including that of gold and silver (See 'What's New') ACC okays several JS-level Appointments, including that of two IRS officers (See 'Mixed Buzz') CBDT issues Addl Charge order for CCITs (See 'Service News' in Pitara) CBDT promotes 23 CCITs as Principal CCITs (See 'Promotion' in Pitara) Coal Scam: Former MoS(Coal) says all decisions relating to allocation of coal blocks were taken by Dr Manmohan Singh Committee of Secretaries recommends Najib Shah's name for CBEC New Chairman + two names for posts of Members Bombay HC permits Nestle to export Maggi Noodles CX - Availment of fraudulent CENVAT credit of Rs.5.64 crores without receipt of inputs & showing purported clearance of inputs as such - it cannot be said that credit has been reversed as buyers would have taken credit - Pre-deposit ordered of 7.5%: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') I-T - Whether if property is sold under duress at lesser value as it was under litigation, provisions of Sec 50C cannot be mechanically applied to tax capital gains - YES: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') What GST brought to Malaysia(See 'DDT' Column) Proposed GST scenario for State of Jammu & Kashmir (See 'ST se GST tak' Column) ST - Construction Service - Notification 1/2006 - There is no specific bar in notification to disallow CENVAT credit of tax paid on Input services for previous period - Tax paid on Input services received prior to 01.03.2006 and credit taken on 01.04.2006 is legal and proper: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') It is unfortunate that law enforcing/implementing agency chooses to ignore the law; somehow deny refund, without even considering legal options (See 'DDT') CENVAT - Rule 4 - C.I.Moulds were not in possession and use of appellant in subsequent year as same were rendered as scrap and cleared from factory - balance 50% of credit on said capital goods is not available and has been correctly denied: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Question of eligibility of CENVAT Credit while claiming Rebate? (See 'DDT') Arvind Panagariya says Indian economy to be worth USD 3 trillion in 5 years DGFT revamps official website and launches mobile app Govt keen to open up legal sector to foreign firms CBI books Gurgaon-based company for taking PSB for a ride (See 'Mixed Buzz') Greece crisis may lead to fund outflows from India, says Finance Secretary IPL betting: Delhi Court to deliver decision on July 25 Order passed by 'Designated authority' under VCES is appealable under Section 85 of Finance Act, 1994: High Court (See 'Breaking News') Beggar Thy Neighbour - Great Depression ahead? - RBI clarifies (See 'DDT' Column) Income tax - Whether fact that objects of assessee trust may be hit by proviso to Sec 2(15), can have any bearing on grant of registration u/s 12AA - NO: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') With Monsoon Tail Wind, will GST Bill sail through? (See 'Guest' Column) Suppression of facts - SCN issued after a period of two and half years after assessee had voluntarily disclosed their affairs is not barred by limitation - High Court upholds order of Tribunal (See 'Breaking News') Telangana wants back Rs. 1274 crores taken away from RBI by Income Tax Department (See 'DDT') Whether if writ petition has been allowed and assessee was permitted to file its objections before authority concerned, is there any justification on part of Writ Court for giving direction for making deposit of 10% of tax amount - NO: HC (See '2015-TIOL-1507-HC') Uniform Allowance Taxable? (See 'DDT') I-T- Whether if assessee falls within first proviso to sec 2(15), benefit of registration which flow from sec.12A, would still be available to it - NO: ITAT (See '2015-TIOL-941-ITAT') Cairn Energy's Arbitration Plea rejected - Taxation Outside Arbitration (See 'DDT') PM calls for Second Green Revolution; lays down foundation stone for Agri Research Institute in Jharkhand RBI Dy Governor R Gandhi says banks are easy prey to fraudsters Mumbai empty local train rams into platform at Churchgate station
 
Bookmark and Share
Valuation of goods sold through depot - is rule 7 redundant?

TIOL-DDT 659
18.07.2007
Wednesday

1. Central Excise Valuation law has undergone a sea change with effect from July 1, 2000. A new Section 4 was introduced in the Central Excise Act, 1944 (CEA) supported by a new set of valuation rules [Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000]. The earlier concept of arriving at the value for the purpose of levy of excise duty based on the 'normal price in the course of wholesale trade' was replaced by the concept of 'transaction value'. The other significant change was the definition of 'place of removal' was restricted to that of a factory or a warehouse in the new Section 4 (3) (c) of CEA. The depots, consignment agent's premises were excluded from the definition of 'place of removal'. The definition of 'time of removal' was altogether deleted in the new Section 4.

2. In the new valuation rules, Rule 7 was introduced to deduce the value of a transaction from the factory gate to the customers through the depots/consignment agent's premises. The Rule 7 of the new valuation rules is extracted below for ready reference:

"Rule 7. Where the excisable goods are not sold by the assessee at the time and place of removal but are transferred to a depot, premises of a consignment or any other place or premises (hereinafter referred to as "such other place") from where the excisable goods are to be sold after their clearance from the place of removal and where the assessee and the buyer of the said goods are not related and the price is the sole consideration for the sale, the value shall be the normal transaction value of such goods sold from such other place at or about the same time and, where such goods are not sold at or about the same time, at the time nearest to the time of removal of goods under assessment."

The concept of 'normal transaction value' was introduced in Rule 7 of the valuation rules. 'Normal transaction value' was defined as the transaction value at which the greatest aggregate quantities of goods are sold from the depot at or about the nearest time to the time of removal of the goods under assessment at the factory gate.

3. Since the normal transaction value of the greatest aggregate quantity was not immediately available for the factory gate sale at the time of removal, the assessees were forced to reconcile the factory gate stock transfer price with the 'normal transaction value' available at that point in time. This leads to a big arithmetic exercise for assessees who had a majority of sales through their depots. It was a mammoth exercise in futility. It normally resulted in payment of differential duty and also file refund claims wherever the 'normal transaction value' was less than the factory gate stock transfer price to a depot.

4. In the year 2003, vide Section 136 of Finance Act 2003 with effect from 14.05.2003, the definition of 'place of removal' in Section 4 (3) (c) of CEA was amended to include depots, consignment agent's premises among other things. The definition of 'time of removal' was also introduced vide a new sub-clause (cc) in sub-section 3 of Section 4. However Rule 7 of the valuation rules remained the same. When we substitute the words 'place of removal' for depot or the premises of a consignment agent, Rule 7 of the valuation rules will read as

"Where the excisable goods are not sold by the assessee at the time and place of removal but are transferred to a "place of removal" (hereinafter referred to as "such other place") from where the excisable goods are to be sold after their clearance from the place of removal and where the assessee and the buyer of the said goods are not related and the price is the sole consideration for the sale, the value shall be the normal transaction value of such goods sold from such other place at or about the same time and, where such goods are not sold at or about the same time, at the time nearest to the time of removal of goods under assessment."

5. So it leads to an absurd situation because the value at one 'place of removal' has to be adopted at the other 'place of removal'. So the price at the factory gate can be adopted at the depot and vice versa. The original intention of the Rule 7 was to adopt the normal transaction value of the goods sold at the depot/consignment agent's at the factory gate by factoring in the nearest time. Now with the change in the definition of the 'place of removal' to include depot/consignment agent's premises etc the 'normal transaction value' at the factory gate can also be adopted for the sale at depot. The net result is that as there is no distinction between the factory gate and the depot, in other words, depot being an extension of the factory gate, the transaction value for each removal of goods at the depot or the factory gate shall be distinct from each other. The transaction value at one place of removal need not be adopted at the other place of removal because every transaction value is independent of each other. This leads us to a situation where even the removal of goods from a depot for sale to an independent buyer shall be covered in terms of Section 4(1) (a) of CEA.

6. Therefore, the assessees need not resort to any arithmetic jugglery to arrive at the 'normal transaction value' at the depots and adopt the same for the factory gate sale. In other words, Rule 7 of the valuation rules and the concept of arriving at the 'normal transaction value' have totally become irrelevant with effect from 14.05.2003.

7. However, unfortunately, many stakeholders viz., assessees, departmental officers and even the consultants in the indirect tax domain have failed to understand this significant change brought in by the amendments through Finance Act, 2003 and the consequential redundancy of arriving at the 'normal transaction value' and Rule 7 of the valuation rules for arriving at the value to be adopted for a factory gate sale. The amendments brought in by the Finance Act 2003 puts depot sales on par with the factory gate sale and the transactions at both the ends have to be viewed independently in view of the provisions of Section 4 (1) (a) of CEA.

My friend Santosh Hatwar sent me the above piece. He has a point. What do you think? Mail us your opinion and will CBEC take note?

Import of metallic waste and scrap - DGFT amends procedure - no more import through ICD, Delhi

As per para 2.32.2(b) of the HOP, Import of scrap would take place only through following designated ports and no exceptions would be allowed even in case of EOUs, SEZs:-

1

Chennai

8

New Mangalore

15

Kolkata

22

CFSMulund

2

Cochin

9

Paradip

16

ICD Ludhiana

23

ICD Kanpur

3

Ennore

10

Tuticorin

17

ICDDadri (Greater Noida)

24

ICD Ahmedabad

4

JNPT

11

Vishakhapatnam

18

ICD Nagpur

25

ICDPitampur

5

Kandla

12

ICDTughlakabad (New Delhi)

19

ICD Jodhpur

26

ICDMalanpur

6

Mormugao

13

Pipava

20

ICDJaipur

7

Mumbai

14

Mundra

21

ICD Udaipur

Now ICDTughlakabad (New Delhi) is removed from the list and ICDLoni, Ghaziabad is included in its place.

The new system of import from registered sources was to come into effect from 1.10.2007. Now they will be effective from 1.4.2008.

DGFT PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 19(RE-2007)/2004-2009., Dated: July 16, 2007

NO REVENUE DEFICIT BY 2008-09 - FM-SPEAK

After a meeting with the chief commissioners of income-tax yesterday, Mr Chidambaram said:-

1. The revenue deficit would be eliminated by 2008-09.

2. The target of reducing fiscal deficit to 3.3 per cent of GDP as well as collecting Rs 2,67,490crores direct tax revenues would be met this fiscal.

3. We have been right so far, there is no reason why we should be wrong next year.

4. The Fiscal Responsibility and Budgetary Management Act has targeted revenue deficit to be wiped out by 2008-09.

5. I will achieve whatever I have proposed in the budget

6. The total direct taxes collected for the first three months stood at Rs 41,154 crores. We are on target. I am confident that the targets would be achieved. Anything more than that, I will welcome.

7. Overall direct tax collections are expected to grow by 16.31 per cent at Rs 2,67,490crores.

8. e-filing of tax deducted at source (TDS) returns will be mandatory from September 1, 2007 for corporates and those companies whose turnover is Rs 40 lakh or more a year.

9. e-payment of TDS would be mandatory from them from January 1, 2008.

10. File your returns today; there will be no extension.

Income Tax Department launches Taxpayer Education Programme

To provide quality taxpayer service, the Income Tax Department has initiated a Taxpayer Education Programme where the taxpayers are trained in filling up the new Income Tax Return forms ITR 1, 2 and 4. It involves a tutorial which provides step by step information on how to fill up these forms. There is a voice over in English which explains the contents of the slide. The officers of the Department will train the taxpayers with the help of this tutorial.

From our Legal Corner - tomorrow's casesLegal Corner Icon

Customs

DRI raids importer - DRI officer arrested by CBI for taking bribe - importer to be detained under COFEPOSA - detention can be challenged before execution - Revenue fails to rebut allegations - order of detention is passed for extraneous reasons and not for collateral purpose : Delhi HC

Sales Tax

Spices after grinding made into masala powder - commercially a new commodity emerges - liable to sales tax : SC

THE appellant is engaged in the business of purchasing various spices like Cumin Seed (Jeera), Fenugreek Seeds (Methi), Cinnamon (Dalchini), Caraway Seeds (Shahijeera) etc. from the registered dealers in the State of Andhra Pradesh and the said items are subjected to sales tax at the point of first sale the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957. All the items are called spices. The appellant by mixing and grinding all these spices together produces masala powder which is used for enhancing the taste of food.

Income Tax

Order passed by transferred officer is valid because it was not originally challenged and because there is no prejudice caused : ITAT

See our columns tomorrow for the judgements

Until Tomorrow with more DDT

Have a nice day.

Mail your comments to vijaywrite@taxindiaonline.com


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
 
 
Download TIOL App
TIOL SEARCH
 
TIOL Subscriptions
 All-In-One Package
 Indirect Tax Package
 Income Tax Package
<< More Packages>>
 
   
             
Income Tax Customs Excise Service Tax FEMA DGFT SEZ Misc Pitara Budget
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • ITAT Cases
  • Instructions
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Other Case
  • Directorate of Income Tax (Systems)
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Safeguard Duty Notfn
  • Anti-dumping Notfn
  • Drawback Cases
  • MISC Circulars
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Excise Amendment
  • Clean Energy Cess Notfn
  • MISC Circulars
  • 37B Order
  • Commr.(A) Order
  • CESTAT
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Miscellaneous
  • Advance Ruling
  • FAQ
  • Finance Act, 1994
  • Commr. (A) Orders
  • 37B Order
  • Removal of Difficulty
  • VCES
  • Accounting Head
  • Exchange Manual
  • Fema Notifications
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • RBI Notifications
  • Act
  • Rules
  • Regulations
  • Master Circulars
  • RBI Circulars
  • PMLA Notifications
  • Depository Scheme
  • Press Note
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Public Notices
  • Trade Notice
  • FTDR Amendment 2010
  • MISC
  • State Acts
  • Notifications
  • Instructions
  • Act 2005
  • Rules 2006
  • DGEP
  • State Policy
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • VAT Cases
  • Deputation Posts
  • Service News
  • The Insider
  • Transfer
  • Promotion
  • Recruitment Rules
  • Transfer Policy
  • Training Circulars
  • Service Cases
  • MISC
  • Pay Commission
  • Cadre Review
  • Budget Circular
  • Union Budgets
  • Economic Surveys
  • Budget Speeches
  • Finance Acts
  • Finance Bill
  • TRU - D. O. Letter
  • A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2015 Taxindiaonline.com Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved. | Powered by 4th Dimension