News Update

CLAT 2024 exams to be held on Dec 1NCGG commences Programme for officials of TanzaniaGST - Appellate Authority has not noticed the provisions of Section 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 which mandates that the day on which the judgment complained of was pronounced, is also to be excluded: HCDefence Secretary commends BRO for playing major role in country's securityGST - If the Proper Officer was of the view that the reply filed was insufficient, he could have sought more clarification - Without providing any such opportunity, impugned order could not have been passed - Matter remanded: HCSC holds influencers, celebrities equally accountable for misleading adsGST - Notice requiring petitioner to furnish additional information/clarification does not mention that petitioner had to appear for personal hearing - Since no opportunity of personal hearing was given, order is unsustainable: HCIndian Naval ships arrive at Singapore; to head towards South China SeaGST - For the purposes of DNB and FNB courses, petitioner clearly falls within the scope of an educational institution imparting education to students enrolled with it as a part of a curriculum - Services exempted: HCIndia's MEDTECH industry holds immense potential: Dr Arunish ChawlaKejriwal’s judicial custody extended till May 20GST - Candidates appearing for the screening tests are not students of the petitioner - Petitioner's claim of exemption on such examination fees is unmerited: HCBrisk voting reported from all 96 LS seats; PM casts vote in AhmedabadGST - NEET examinations are in the nature of an entrance examination - Petitioner would be entitled to the benefit of an exemption by virtue of Serial No.66(aa) of the 2017 Notification, which came into effect on 25.01.2018: HCIndia calls back half of troops stationed at MaldivesIndia-Australia DTAA: Economic Statecraft through TaxRBI alerts against misuse of banking channels for facilitating illegal forex tradingTime Limit to file Appeal in GST Appellate TribunalEC censures Jagan Reddy & Chandrababu Naidu for MCC violationsFrance tells Xi Jinping EU needs protection from China’s cheap importsI-T- Addition cannot be made merely for reason that assessee got property transferred through registered sale without making payment to vendor: ITATI-T- Addition which is not based on the reasons for reopening is un-sustainable sans notice u/s 148 of the ACT: ITATOxygen valve malfunction delays launch of Boeing’s first crewed spacecraftFM administers Oath to Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra as first President of GST TribunalGhana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in Haryana
 
I-T - Sec 80IA benefits are available to even franchisees of basic telephone service providers although it may only be erecting EPABX System: ITAT Special Bench

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, MAR 11, 2019: THE ISSUE IS - Whether deduction u/s 80IA(4)(ii) which is available to basic Telecom Service Providers is also available to franchisees of such service providers, even if it is only putting EPABX system. YES IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case

The assessee filed return of income for the relevant AY. The returned income was accepted. Subsequently, notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was issued. On scrutiny of the accounts, the AO observed that the assessee had claimed deduction of Rs. 2,07,91,043/- u/s 80IA of the Act. According to the assessee, it had shown income from telecommunication. It was submitted before the AO that in earlier years also such deduction was claimed by the assessee, it was disallowed by the AO. However, when dispute travelled to the Tribunal deduction was granted to the assessee. The AO observed that right from the AY 1997-98 to 2001-02 such deduction was disallowed to the assessee, though CIT(A) and Tribunal had allowed the deduction to the assessee, but department had not accepted the order of the Tribunal and carried the matter before the Gujarat High Court. The AO did not accept the claim of the assessee, because in earlier year, Department went in appeal before the High Court. Accordingly, the AO disallowed the claim of the assessee. On appeal, CIT(A) passed order in favour of Assessee.

On appeal, Tribunal held that,

++ jurisdictional High Court has adjudicated this issue in favour of the assessee, wherein it has been held that the assessees who are franchisees of BSNL and who have been permitted to install, maintain and operate in dialing EPABX under the franchisees to support the department can be treated to have provided “basic telephone services". This would amount to creation of infrastructure entitling them for deduction under section 80IA. Relying on authoritative pronouncement of the jurisdictional High Court in the assessee's own case, it was viewed that question referred to Bench deserves to be answered in favour of the assessee, and against Revenue;

++ the appeal has also been transferred to the Special Bench. Considering the opinion of Special Bench coupled with ratio laid down by the High Court in assessee's own case, it was held that the assessee is entitled for deduction u/s 80IA(4)(ii) of the Act. The CIT(A) has rightly granted the same to the assessee. No merit was found in appeal of the Revenue. In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.

(See 2019-TIOL-624-ITAT-AHM-SB)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.