News Update

SC holds influencers, celebrities equally accountable for misleading adsGST - Appellate Authority has not noticed the provisions of Section 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 which mandates that the day on which the judgment complained of was pronounced, is also to be excluded: HCKejriwal’s judicial custody extended till May 20GST - If the Proper Officer was of the view that the reply filed was insufficient, he could have sought more clarification - Without providing any such opportunity, impugned order could not have been passed - Matter remanded: HCGST - Notice requiring petitioner to furnish additional information/clarification does not mention that petitioner had to appear for personal hearing - Since no opportunity of personal hearing was given, order is unsustainable: HCGST - For the purposes of DNB and FNB courses, petitioner clearly falls within the scope of an educational institution imparting education to students enrolled with it as a part of a curriculum - Services exempted: HCGST - Candidates appearing for the screening tests are not students of the petitioner - Petitioner's claim of exemption on such examination fees is unmerited: HCGST - NEET examinations are in the nature of an entrance examination - Petitioner would be entitled to the benefit of an exemption by virtue of Serial No.66(aa) of the 2017 Notification, which came into effect on 25.01.2018: HCBrisk voting reported from all 96 LS seats; PM casts vote in AhmedabadIndia calls back half of troops stationed at MaldivesIndia-Australia DTAA: Economic Statecraft through TaxRBI alerts against misuse of banking channels for facilitating illegal forex tradingTime Limit to file Appeal in GST Appellate TribunalEC censures Jagan Reddy & Chandrababu Naidu for MCC violationsFrance tells Xi Jinping EU needs protection from China’s cheap importsI-T- Addition cannot be made merely for reason that assessee got property transferred through registered sale without making payment to vendor: ITATI-T- Addition which is not based on the reasons for reopening is un-sustainable sans notice u/s 148 of the ACT: ITATOxygen valve malfunction delays launch of Boeing’s first crewed spacecraftFM administers Oath to Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra as first President of GST TribunalGhana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in Haryana
 
I-T - Section 194C - If composite invoice is raised with details of prices of equipments supplied along with installation charges, TDS not to be deducted on full value: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, OCT 05, 2017: THE Issue before the Tribunal is - Whether TDS is liable to be deducted only u/s 194J on the value of professional services of installation, deployment and redeployment, and not in respect of supply of equipment. YES is the answer.

Facts of the case:

The Assessee is a telecom company. During the subject year, it had awarded contract works to HCL Infosystems Ltd. connected with the project of Commonwealth Games, 2010, held in New Delhi. In order to verify the compliance by the Assessee with reference to the TDS provisions under Chapter XVII-B of the Act, a query letter was issued to the Assessee for some information. The Assessee was required to furnish the details of TDS deducted on the payments made to the HCL. The Assessee was also required to submit the copies of acknowledgements of filing quarterly e-TDS on the payments made and also to submit the copies of acknowledgements of filing quarterly e-TDS returns for the concerned FYs. As per the AO, the Assessee had not furnished any information / response with reference to the query letter and as the matter involved time limitation, AO had no alternative except to pass the order u/s. 201(1) /201(1A) for the FY 2010-11 holding that the Assessee had paid all the contract amount during FY 2010-11 and accordingly the Assessee was liable to deduct tax at source in accordance with the provisions of section 194C/194J from those amounts paid and since there was no evidence brought before the AO to establish that that tax was deducted at source, the Assessee was deemed to be in default for that amount and accordingly, the Assessee was also liable to pay interest u/s. 201(1A).

Tribunal held that,

++ in respect of agreement for the supply of equipments, no TDS is deductible u/s 194C, as it is amounts to a contract of sale. HCL Infosystems Ltd. supplied equipments as per the specifications of the Assessee but the same have not been purchased from MTNL. HCL Infosystems Ltd. has purchased the said equipments from person other than such customer i.e. not from MTNL. Hence, TDS provisions would not fall applicable on the supply of equipments. Further since billing for the supply of equipments is separate from that of the services, TDS would not be deducted on the supply of equipments. Thus, TDS would only be liable to be deducted on the value of Professional services availed by the Assessee u/s 194J. The Assessee has duly complied with the law by deducting TDS on services provided by HCL Infosystems Ltd. Thus based on such facts, provisions of law, case laws, circulations and clarifications it is clear that MTNL is not liable to deduct TDS on the said transaction of Supply of equipments provided by HCL Infosystems Ltd;

++ however, the provisions of TDS would fall applicable on the Services of installation, deployment and redeployment which has been duly deducted and deposited by the Assessee. With regards to facts, HCL Infosystems Ltd. supplied equipments as per the specifications of the Assessee company but the same have not been purchased from appellant and also the billing for the supply of equipments has been separately done from that of the services. Furthermore as per the provisions stated u/s 194C, tax shall be deducted at source on the invoice value excluding the value of material, if such value is mentioned separately in the invoice. Thus, it is clear that TDS would not liable to be deducted on the supply of equipments as the same is not being covered under the purview of Section 194C;

++ in view of case laws, circulations and clarifications, it is clear that in respect of agreement for the supply of equipments, no TDS is deductible u/s 194C. The TDS would only be liable to be deducted on the value of professional services of installation, deployment and redeployment availed by the appellant company u/s 194J which the Assessee has already deducted and deposited. It is also clear that Assessee is not liable to deduct TDS on the said transaction of supplying of equipments as per the provisions of Section 194C. In the view of the clear provisions of Section 194C, the Assessee is not liable to deduct TDS amounting to Rs.6,64,00,359/- on the supply of equipments by M/ s HCL Infosystems Ltd., therefore, the CIT(A) under the circumstances has rightly held that the action of AO of holding Assessee company as in default for amount of Rs.6,64,00,359/- was without any cogent basis. Accordingly, CIT(A) has rightly gave the relief to the Assessee in respect of the total amount, which does not need any interference.

(See 2017-TIOL-1369-ITAT-DEL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.