News Update

ICG seizes 86 kg narcotics worth Rs 600 croreChief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan concludes his official visit to France9 killed as two vehicles ram into each other in ChhattisgarhConsumer court orders Swiggy to compensate for failure to deliver Ice CreamRequisite Checks for Appeals - Court FeeI-T - Members of Settlement Commission appointed amongst persons of integrity & outstanding ability & having special knowledge in/experience of direct taxes; unfortunate that SETCOM's orders are challenged without establishing them to be contrary to law or lacking in jurisdiction: HCThe 'taxing' story of Malabar Parota, calories notwithstanding!I-T - Unless a case of bias, fraud or malice is alleged, then Department cannot assail SETCOM's order: HCCentre allows export of 99,150 MT onion to Bangladesh, UAE, Bhutan, Bahrain, Mauritius & LankaI-T- Re-assessment vide Faceless Assessment u/s 144 of I-T Act, is barred by Section 31 of IBC 2016, which is binding upon all creditors of corporate debtor: HCPension Portals of all Pension Disbursing Banks to be integratedI-T- Resolution Plan under IBC, once approved, nullifies any claims pertaining to a period prior to approval of said Plan: HC‘Flash Mob’ drive in London seeks support for PM ModiI-T - Once assessee has produced all supporting documents which includes profit & loss account, balance sheet and copy of ITR of creditors, then identity & creditworthiness is established: ITATTo deliver political message, Pak Sessions judge abducted and then released: KPKI-T - Assessee shall provide monthly figures to arrive at year-end average of deposits received from members, interest paid thereon & investments made in FDs from external funds, for calculating Sec 80P deduction: ITATMaersk to invest USD 600 mn in Nigerian seaport infraI-T - It shall not be necessary to issue authorization u/s 132 separately in name of each person where authorization has been issued mentioning thereon more than one person: ITATChile announces 3-day national mourning after three police officers killedI-T- Since facts have not yet been verified by AO, issue of CSR expenditure can be remanded back for reconsideration: ITATIndian Coast Guard intercepts Pakistani boat with 86 kg drugs worth Rs 600 CroreI-T - Failure to substantiate cash deposits by employer during festival will not automatically lead to additions u/s 68, in absence of any opportunity of hearing: ITATGold watch of richest Titanic pax auctioned for USD 1.46 millionGST - There is no material on record to show as to why the registration is sought to be cancelled retrospectively - Order cannot be sustained: HCIraq is latest to criminalise same-sex marriage with max 15 yrs of jail-termST - Court cannot examine the issue, which is only a question of fact and evidence and not of the law - Petition dismissed: HCGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand notice
 
I-T - Assessee is eligible for deduction u/s 80IA, if he is a developer and not 'works contractor': ITAT

By TIOL News Service

KOLKATA, JUNE 08, 2017: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL IS - Whether assessee is eligible for deduction u/s 80IA, if he is a developer and not 'works contractor'. YES is the answer.

Facts of the case:

The assessee is a AOP (Joint Venture). It was successful in getting the bid for detailed survey, drawing, design and execution of sewerage project on turn-key basis for Zones-II,III,IV and V project of Municipal Corporation at Jabalpur. Accordingly, the assessee entered into an agreement with the two members 1) M/s. Simplex Infrastructue Ltd and 2) M/s. Meinhardt (Singapore) Pte. Ltd) for terms and conditions. Aassessee AOP filed its return. Under scrutiny, notices u/s. 143(2) & 142(1) were issued. In response to which, the assessee appeared time to time and filed various details and supporting evidences in support of the return as filed. The AO found that the assessee has claimed deduction u/s. 80IA being identical amount of net profit for development of infrastructure facility. The AO was of the view that the assessee JV (Joint Venture) received contractual amount of Rs.15,04,45,674/- for the work done and derived net profit of Rs.43,85,379/-. In the audit report as well as in the return of income the assessee JV claimed the same as deduction u/s. 80IA(4) of the Act. The AO further found that the assessee raised RA bills in accordance with the measurement and held that it is a work contract within the meaning of Explanation to section 80IA, which was substituted by the Finance Act 2009 and came into force w.e.f 1-4-2000 retrospectively. However, the AO considering the status of assessee as a 'works contractor’ the claim of deduction u/s. 80IA of the Act was disallowed and added the same to the total income of the assessee. The assessee challenged the same before the CIT(A) who was of the view that the assessee was a developer and as such Explanation to section 80IA(13) does not apply to the assessee. Therefore, the following the earlier order of the Kolkata Tribunal in assessee’s own case for the AY 2008-09 and earlier order of the CIT(A) XIX for the AY 2009-10 allowed the deduction u/s. 80IA. He directed the AO to allow deduction u/s. 80IA.

On appeal, the HC held that,

++ the assessee stood successful in getting the bid for detailed survey, drawing, design and execution of sewerage project on turn-key basis for Zones-II,III, IV and V project at Jabalpur. The assessee JV was awarded the said project work by the Municipal Commissioner, Jabalpur. Thereby the assessee is a developer for the reason that the assessee involved in preparation survey, drawing, design and execution of sewerage project work. We find that the assessee made investments and development of infrastructure to support the various contract works. The assessee is also responsible in all respects for the procurement of labours, machinery, equipments, goods, materials for the said project work. The assessee is also responsible for the payment and supply of labour, water and electric charges usage for the project. The assessee is responsible for making the payments of labours and for supply of various items related to the said project. We also find that the Bombay High Court in the case of CIT Vs. ABG Heavy Industries Limited reported - 2010-TIOL-151-HC-MUM-ITclarify that in order to avail of a deduction, the assessee could (i) develop or (ii) operate and maintain or (iii) develop, operate and maintain the facility. Therefore, the fulfillment of these three activities/ conditions by the assessee would become eligible for claim of deduction. On perusal of the terms and conditions in the agreement, it is clear that the assessee was not a works contractor and was a developer and hence Explanation to section 80IA(13) does not apply. Thus, CIT(A) was justified in directing the AO to allow the deduction u/s. 80IA of the Act as claimed by it.

(See 2017-TIOL-807-ITAT-KOL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.