News Update

Loads Mahdi :::: Ashiyane digital security teamIndia, Portugal agree to amend DTAA; Portugal also provides letters between Goa and Portugal in 17th CenturyIGI Airport to saturate in 2024; Govt sanctions Jewar Airport at G NoidaFICCI extends full support for smooth GST rollout in N-EDeemed exports benefits may be lost under GST regime: Commerce SecretaryWeather Portal for power sector launchedCBEC - IRS officers of 1981-82 batches get Apex Grade; become Pr CCsJ&K Deputy CM favours early implementation of GSTCus - Applicant seeking early hearing as he doesn't want any posthumous pardon from legal system - request granted: CESTATPIL filed before Bombay High Court for deferment of GST till next yearBanking Ombudsman - RBI expands scope to impose penalty for wrongly palming off third party products to customersIGI Airport Customs seizes gold worth Rs 1.1 Crore from different paxDomestic tourist visits take a leap of 12.7% in 2016EEPC India opens Technology Centre in BengaluruCyber crimes against children can now be reported at POCSO e-BoxCBEC to celebrate July 1 as GST Day every yearUnion Govt releases fresh list of 30 more Smart CitiesIndia-Malaysia Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (Bilateral Safeguard Measures) Rules, 2017 notifiedGST - Workshop for textiles - TCS software Adhigam earns appreciationTrade in wildlife articles - Dr Harsh Vardhan calls for continuation of harsh actionCabinet okays MoU with Portugal in public administration fieldCX - Debit notes caused deliberate under valuation - penalty is only remedial measure else it would be an incentive to lawlessness: CESTATI-T - Comparable sales instances of commercial properties is no deciding factor in determining valuation of residential flat: HCCX - Whether there is burning loss of 7.5% or even 15% that alone cannot be reason to demand the duty: CESTAT
 
I-T - No deduction u/s 80IB(10) is allowable, when area of housing project falls short of minimum requirement of one acre

By TIOL News Service

ALLAHABAD, APRIL 20, 2017: THE ISSUE IS - Whether assessee would be entitled to a deduction u/s 80IB(10) when area of the housing project of assessee falls short of minimum requirement of one acre. NO is the verdict.

Facts of the case:

The assessee is engaged in the business of construction. It is claimed to have undertaken promotion and development of residential housing project named as "Fortuna Apartment" on three contiguous plots of land. Plan of the project was approved by Lucknow Development Authority on 22.6.03. For AY 2005-06, Asseessee filed return and claimed deduction u/s 80IB (10). AO disallowed deduction claimed by u/s 80IB (10). Assessee preferred appeal before CIT(A) who allowed the appeal. Revenue carried the matter in appeal before Tribunal, who, upheld the view taken by CIT (A). This has been challenged, pointing out that first approval was granted by LDA to the building plan of housing project of Assessee, when total area, as on spot, was only 2657 sq. mts. which was less than one acre. Hence mandatory condition of specification of one acre u/s 80IB (10) was not satisfied.

On appeal, the HC held that,

++ one of the essential conditions to attract deduction u/s 80IB (10) is that the housing project approved by local authority must be on the size of a plot of land which has a minimum area of one acre. The area of land for which housing project was approved by LDA on 24.11.2001 was only 2657 sq. mtrs. Rest of land became available to Assessee on and after 15.4.2002 and 14.10.2003, therefore, approval granted by LDA on 24.11.2001 cannot be deemed to be applicable to those plots which became available to Assessee much subsequently. And even second approval when granted on 22.6.2003, total area of 2 plots was only 2657 sq. mtrs. and 52.44 sq. mtrs. which was again less than one acre. Therefore, the Assessee did not satisfy the requirement of area of plot of land being minimum one acre, for purpose of deduction u/s 80IB.

(See 2017-TIOL-760-HC-ALL-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS