News Update

Govt hikes retirement age of Ayush doctors & civilian docs of Armed Forces to 65Govt hikes retirement age of Ayush doctors & civilian docs of Armed Forces to 65Defence Accounts Service officer Ms Swaranashree Rao appointed as Spokesperson for Ministry of DefenceDirect tax collections peak at Rs 6.9 lakh cr after refund of Rs 1.2 lakh crPadmavat film maker moves Apex Court against ban by some StatesGovt decides to reduce quantum of borrowing from Rs 50K Crore to only Rs 20K Crore after review of revenue collections trendA nuanced approach to Works Contract under GST (See 'TOG Insight' in Taxongo.com)I-T - When court finds that assessee has not truly disclosed all facts in case & now wants to withdraw soiled petition, liberty to file fresh petition can only be granted if Revenue is compensated for suffering costs on account of assessee's mistake - YES: HCGovt to strike off fresh lot of 1.2 lakh shell companies from RoC RegisterGST Council to rationalise tax rates on many goods & Services tomorrowCX - Outdoor Catering Services is a necessity but once said service is excluded, the use of such service, whether statutorily required or otherwise, does not render the services eligible for CENVAT: CESTATI-T - When agreement is all about purchase of developed residential sites, merely because developer had to construct some common facilities before the handover, it would amount to 'works contract' - NO: ITATCII demands C Form be continued till Petroleum & Natural Gas brought under GSTCentral Advisory Board favours online education & more autonomy for quality institutesHelpdesk should respond on time and give correct guidanceCacophony against amending Constitution is Music for the IgnorantFirst course on Sustainable Urban Planning launchedScience & technology to be harnessed for preservation of environment: Dr Harsh VardhanMilk production registers 20% growthSteel Industry seeks removal of Customs duty on raw materialsFake encounter - SC asks SIT to wrap up probe in 12 FIRs by Feb-endHaryana also bans release of ‘Padmavat’I-T - When doings of assessee are not found to be not above board, it does not deserve invocation of extraordinary jurisdiction of HC under Art 226: HCPublic art should be part of urban planning: PuriGSTN technical glitches to be reviewed by Sushil Modi-headed Committee tomorrowCX - Without canteen, factory would not be allowed to operate under Factories Act, 1948 - Outdoor catering services, not primarily for personal use or consumption of employee, is covered under definition of Input service: CESTATCENVAT - Services of merger has no relation with manufacture - Even if order goes beyond the SCN, same is not an error of a kind which can be rectified by a ROM application: CESTAT
 
I-T - No deduction u/s 80IB(10) is allowable, when area of housing project falls short of minimum requirement of one acre

By TIOL News Service

ALLAHABAD, APRIL 20, 2017: THE ISSUE IS - Whether assessee would be entitled to a deduction u/s 80IB(10) when area of the housing project of assessee falls short of minimum requirement of one acre. NO is the verdict.

Facts of the case:

The assessee is engaged in the business of construction. It is claimed to have undertaken promotion and development of residential housing project named as "Fortuna Apartment" on three contiguous plots of land. Plan of the project was approved by Lucknow Development Authority on 22.6.03. For AY 2005-06, Asseessee filed return and claimed deduction u/s 80IB (10). AO disallowed deduction claimed by u/s 80IB (10). Assessee preferred appeal before CIT(A) who allowed the appeal. Revenue carried the matter in appeal before Tribunal, who, upheld the view taken by CIT (A). This has been challenged, pointing out that first approval was granted by LDA to the building plan of housing project of Assessee, when total area, as on spot, was only 2657 sq. mts. which was less than one acre. Hence mandatory condition of specification of one acre u/s 80IB (10) was not satisfied.

On appeal, the HC held that,

++ one of the essential conditions to attract deduction u/s 80IB (10) is that the housing project approved by local authority must be on the size of a plot of land which has a minimum area of one acre. The area of land for which housing project was approved by LDA on 24.11.2001 was only 2657 sq. mtrs. Rest of land became available to Assessee on and after 15.4.2002 and 14.10.2003, therefore, approval granted by LDA on 24.11.2001 cannot be deemed to be applicable to those plots which became available to Assessee much subsequently. And even second approval when granted on 22.6.2003, total area of 2 plots was only 2657 sq. mtrs. and 52.44 sq. mtrs. which was again less than one acre. Therefore, the Assessee did not satisfy the requirement of area of plot of land being minimum one acre, for purpose of deduction u/s 80IB.

(See 2017-TIOL-760-HC-ALL-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS