News Update

FM says Chief Economic Adviser Arvind Subramanian’s tenure to be extended till Oct, 2018Income Tax conducts search at premises of S M Krishna's son-in-law who heads CCD GroupPak troops shoot at BSF posts in J&K; 5 injuredGST on 'out and out' transactions (See 'TOG Insight' in Taxongo.com)Whether due date for submission of GST TRANS-1 is really extended?Illegal income tax raids - Govt advises taxpayers to inspect warrants of searchesCII calls for 1% interest rate cut for job creationAffordable housing - Industry takes up GST issue with GovtIncome Tax - Provisions of Sec 115O do trench on powers of State Legislature to tax agri income but such incidential trenching does not warrant annulment of legislation: Supreme CourtGST - Govt notifies new rates for Duty Credit Scrips, saree falls, roasted grams and many other items + restriction on refund for corduroy fabrics + exemption to khadi fabric, musical instruments and many other items + clarity on issue of cereals etc sold in unit container with brand nameJuly GSTR-3B can now be edited and submitted: GSTNBlockage of Exporters' working capital - Govt exploring link between GSTR-1 & GSTR-3B Govt grants conditional IGST exemption to skimmed milk powder or concentrated milkCBI arrests Mumbai DCIT in alleged Rs 3 Crore corruption caseSC favours creation of portal to attend to home buyers’ grievancesNPPA notifies ceiling price exclusive of GST for 7 drugs including Rifabutin & Hepatitis B ImmunoglobulinCentral Govt notifies Porbandar Wildlife Sanctuary as Eco-sensitive zone; Industries not allowed in its surroundingsYogi Adityanath’s resignation from Lok Sabha notified to be valid from Sept 21, 2017New Drawback Rules, 2017 and AIR of Drawback explainedWealth Tax - Amendment made to Sec 40(3) vide FAs 1983 & 1988 is substantive in nature and that is why it cannot be retrospective: HCI-T- Simply because Writ Court has struck down previous transfer order u/s 127(2)(a), Department is not precluded from initiating fresh procedure: HCGST - Rs 65k Cr TRANS-1 Credit is much less than Rs 1.3 lakh crore as closing balance: GovtDoT finalises guidelines for settlement of claimsNITI, IRF Geneva sign pact in field of Intelligent Transport SystemsCBI nabs former HC Judge in medical admission scamGSTN informs that portal for uploading application seeking advance ruling to be ready only in Jan 2018 - HC questions authority for postponementCBEC makes many amendments in Drawback Rules; excludes many items from list of eligible goods + lists out goods where no drawback is to be determined; New rates to come in force from Oct 1, 2017I-T - Settlement Commission has no authority to review / reopen matters already concluded before it: HC
 
I-T - No deduction u/s 80IB(10) is allowable, when area of housing project falls short of minimum requirement of one acre

By TIOL News Service

ALLAHABAD, APRIL 20, 2017: THE ISSUE IS - Whether assessee would be entitled to a deduction u/s 80IB(10) when area of the housing project of assessee falls short of minimum requirement of one acre. NO is the verdict.

Facts of the case:

The assessee is engaged in the business of construction. It is claimed to have undertaken promotion and development of residential housing project named as "Fortuna Apartment" on three contiguous plots of land. Plan of the project was approved by Lucknow Development Authority on 22.6.03. For AY 2005-06, Asseessee filed return and claimed deduction u/s 80IB (10). AO disallowed deduction claimed by u/s 80IB (10). Assessee preferred appeal before CIT(A) who allowed the appeal. Revenue carried the matter in appeal before Tribunal, who, upheld the view taken by CIT (A). This has been challenged, pointing out that first approval was granted by LDA to the building plan of housing project of Assessee, when total area, as on spot, was only 2657 sq. mts. which was less than one acre. Hence mandatory condition of specification of one acre u/s 80IB (10) was not satisfied.

On appeal, the HC held that,

++ one of the essential conditions to attract deduction u/s 80IB (10) is that the housing project approved by local authority must be on the size of a plot of land which has a minimum area of one acre. The area of land for which housing project was approved by LDA on 24.11.2001 was only 2657 sq. mtrs. Rest of land became available to Assessee on and after 15.4.2002 and 14.10.2003, therefore, approval granted by LDA on 24.11.2001 cannot be deemed to be applicable to those plots which became available to Assessee much subsequently. And even second approval when granted on 22.6.2003, total area of 2 plots was only 2657 sq. mtrs. and 52.44 sq. mtrs. which was again less than one acre. Therefore, the Assessee did not satisfy the requirement of area of plot of land being minimum one acre, for purpose of deduction u/s 80IB.

(See 2017-TIOL-760-HC-ALL-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

GST: एक देश एक कर | गोष्ठी - संस्करण ३