News Update

I-T - Evidence found during search proceedings is not restricted to tangible material: HCI-T - Without break-up of payment made by employer to NRI employees for boarding & lodging, such payments will not fall within exception of Sec. 10(14): HCI-T - So as to be called 'substantial', a question of law must be debatable and not governed by binding precedent: HCI-T - Allotment of Stock Appreciation Rights is distinct from allotment of shares, so not taxable as Capital Gains: SCBlack Money Act - Court cannot direct Revenue to pass final order earlier than maximum time limit given in statute: HCI-T - Bifurcation of lease rental income can be done as per Guidance Note & accounting standards prescribed by ICAI when there is no express bar in I-T Act regarding use of such guidelines: SCDoctrine of Umbilical Cord puts onus on Executive to protect Supreme Court for own survival!UGC releases list of 24 self-styled fake universities; Delhi & UP top tallyI-T - One time membership fees paid to National Stock Exchange for getting registered as broker, is capital expenditure: HCCSIR, DoT join hands to set up Time Stamping & Synchronisation NetworkACC clears elevation of Ms Indu Malhotra as SC Judge but plays possum over Justice K M JosephST - When review order and appeal of revenue has not disputed portion of order dropping demand, revenue cannot, in hearing, before Tribunal dispute same: CESTATDelhi DRI seizes 41 kg foreign-marked gold + Rs 48 lakh cash + 213 kg silver worth Rs 13 CroreI-T - Direct debit of commission by foreign agents before transferring sale considerations, makes exporters ineligible for benefit of Section 80HHC(2): HCISRO reschedules launch of GSAT-11ST - Agreement is for supply of materials and cannot, by any stretch of imagination, be considered as an agreement for rendering services - amount of advance received cannot become part of value: CESTATMSME Ministry to set up Digital Trade DeskKolkata DRI seizes 14.4 lakh foreign cigarettes from container misdeclared as Facial TissueCentral Staffing Scheme - Govt notifies Rs 9000 hike in deputation allowance'Innovate in India' gets USD 125 millionI-T - Payment made to acquire trade mark which facilitates entry into a particular market is revenue expenditure: HCI-T - Interest income earned from deposit of share application money statutorily required to be kept in separate account is incidental in nature and assessee is entitled to set it off against expenses relating to public issue: SCCabinet approves MSP for Raw Jute for 2018-19 seasonI-T - While making invocation of Sec 147 conditional, Legislature does not intend to allow Revenue to adopt liberal interpretation of expression 'reason to believe': SCCabinet okays MoU with BRICS medicine regulatory agenciesJodhpur Court convicts Asaram in Rape CaseCabinet okays declaration of Schedules Areas in Rajasthan under Fifth ScheduleConstruction of GST on Residential Flats (See ' JEST GST on GST Home Page')I-T - Infra companies having exposure to substantial risk connected with construction projects, are eligible for Section 80-IA benefits: ITATWhen Domestic Tax Laws Reach Beyond Customs Frontiers
 
ST - Even if output services which are exempted services are exported, service tax paid on input service is eligible for refund: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, MAR 20, 2017: THE undisputed facts are that the appellant had taken credit of service tax paid on input services received and consumed in providing output services of call centre which was undisputedly exempted. The said credit was taken in April 2006 after the call centre services were made taxable w.e.f. 01/03/2006 and the said amount of credit was utilised for payment of service tax on exported taxable service of BAS during the period October 2006 to February 2007.

Both the lower authorities have rejected the claim of the appellant and ordered for recovery of the CENVAT credit availed in April 2006 as the same were procured during the period when the call centre services was exempted.

Before the CESTAT, the appellant submits that the issue of eligibility to credit in respect of call centre service exported prior to 01/03/2006 has been settled by various decisions of the Tribunal; that in the case of IBM Daksh Business Process Service (P) Ltd. - 2014-TIOL-648-CESTAT-DEL the department rejected the refund under Rule 5 on the ground that the service provided by the appellant is exempted under Notification No. 8/2003-ST but the Tribunal had allowed the refund.

The Bench held that the stand of the department is incorrect as even if the output service which are exempted services and are exported, service tax paid on input service is eligible for the refund and which is the law decided by the KarnatakaHigh Court in the case of mPortal India Wireless Solutions Pvt Ltd - 2011-TIOL-928-HC-KAR-ST.

Holding that the issue is squarely covered by the decisions (supra), the impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.

(See 2017-TIOL-898-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS