News Update

FM says Chief Economic Adviser Arvind Subramanian’s tenure to be extended till Oct, 2018Income Tax conducts search at premises of S M Krishna's son-in-law who heads CCD GroupPak troops shoot at BSF posts in J&K; 5 injuredGST on 'out and out' transactions (See 'TOG Insight' in Taxongo.com)Whether due date for submission of GST TRANS-1 is really extended?Illegal income tax raids - Govt advises taxpayers to inspect warrants of searchesCII calls for 1% interest rate cut for job creationAffordable housing - Industry takes up GST issue with GovtIncome Tax - Provisions of Sec 115O do trench on powers of State Legislature to tax agri income but such incidential trenching does not warrant annulment of legislation: Supreme CourtGST - Govt notifies new rates for Duty Credit Scrips, saree falls, roasted grams and many other items + restriction on refund for corduroy fabrics + exemption to khadi fabric, musical instruments and many other items + clarity on issue of cereals etc sold in unit container with brand nameJuly GSTR-3B can now be edited and submitted: GSTNBlockage of Exporters' working capital - Govt exploring link between GSTR-1 & GSTR-3B Govt grants conditional IGST exemption to skimmed milk powder or concentrated milkCBI arrests Mumbai DCIT in alleged Rs 3 Crore corruption caseSC favours creation of portal to attend to home buyers’ grievancesNPPA notifies ceiling price exclusive of GST for 7 drugs including Rifabutin & Hepatitis B ImmunoglobulinCentral Govt notifies Porbandar Wildlife Sanctuary as Eco-sensitive zone; Industries not allowed in its surroundingsYogi Adityanath’s resignation from Lok Sabha notified to be valid from Sept 21, 2017New Drawback Rules, 2017 and AIR of Drawback explainedWealth Tax - Amendment made to Sec 40(3) vide FAs 1983 & 1988 is substantive in nature and that is why it cannot be retrospective: HCI-T- Simply because Writ Court has struck down previous transfer order u/s 127(2)(a), Department is not precluded from initiating fresh procedure: HCGST - Rs 65k Cr TRANS-1 Credit is much less than Rs 1.3 lakh crore as closing balance: GovtDoT finalises guidelines for settlement of claimsNITI, IRF Geneva sign pact in field of Intelligent Transport SystemsCBI nabs former HC Judge in medical admission scamGSTN informs that portal for uploading application seeking advance ruling to be ready only in Jan 2018 - HC questions authority for postponementCBEC makes many amendments in Drawback Rules; excludes many items from list of eligible goods + lists out goods where no drawback is to be determined; New rates to come in force from Oct 1, 2017I-T - Settlement Commission has no authority to review / reopen matters already concluded before it: HC
 
ST - Even if output services which are exempted services are exported, service tax paid on input service is eligible for refund: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, MAR 20, 2017: THE undisputed facts are that the appellant had taken credit of service tax paid on input services received and consumed in providing output services of call centre which was undisputedly exempted. The said credit was taken in April 2006 after the call centre services were made taxable w.e.f. 01/03/2006 and the said amount of credit was utilised for payment of service tax on exported taxable service of BAS during the period October 2006 to February 2007.

Both the lower authorities have rejected the claim of the appellant and ordered for recovery of the CENVAT credit availed in April 2006 as the same were procured during the period when the call centre services was exempted.

Before the CESTAT, the appellant submits that the issue of eligibility to credit in respect of call centre service exported prior to 01/03/2006 has been settled by various decisions of the Tribunal; that in the case of IBM Daksh Business Process Service (P) Ltd. - 2014-TIOL-648-CESTAT-DEL the department rejected the refund under Rule 5 on the ground that the service provided by the appellant is exempted under Notification No. 8/2003-ST but the Tribunal had allowed the refund.

The Bench held that the stand of the department is incorrect as even if the output service which are exempted services and are exported, service tax paid on input service is eligible for the refund and which is the law decided by the KarnatakaHigh Court in the case of mPortal India Wireless Solutions Pvt Ltd - 2011-TIOL-928-HC-KAR-ST.

Holding that the issue is squarely covered by the decisions (supra), the impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.

(See 2017-TIOL-898-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

GST: एक देश एक कर | गोष्ठी - संस्करण ३