News Update

World Energy Congress 2024: IREDA CMD highlights need for Innovative Financing SolutionsVoter turnout surpasses 50% by 4 PM in Phase 2 pollsST - Amendment made to FA, 1994 on 14.05.2015 making service tax applicable retrospectively on chit-fund business is only prospective - Refund payable of tax paid between 01.07.2012 to 13.05.2015: HCXI tells Blinken - China, US ought to be partners, not rivalsST - SVLDRS, 2019 - Amnesty Scheme, being of the nature of an exemption from the requirement to pay the actual tax due to the government, have to be considered strictly in favour of the revenue: HCCX - Issue involved is valuation of goods u/r 10A of CE Valuation Rules, 2000 - Appeal lies before Supreme Court: HCCus - Smuggling - A person carrying any article on his belonging would be presumed to be aware of the contents of the articles being carried by him: HCCus - Penalty that could be imposed for smuggling 3.2 kg of gold was Rs.88.40 lakhs, being the value of gold, but what is imposed is Rs.10 lakhs - Penalty not at all disproportionate: HCCus - Keeping in mind the balance of convenience and irreparable injury which may be caused to Revenue, importer to continue indemnity bond of 115 crore and possession of confiscated diamonds to remain with department: HCCus - OIA was passed in October 2022 remanding the matter to adjudicating authority but matter not yet disposed of - Six weeks' time granted to dispose proceedings: HCI-T - High Court need not intervene in matter involving factual issues; petitioner may utilise option of appeal: HCChina asks Blinken to select between cooperation or confrontationI-T - Unexplained cash credit - additions u/s 68 unsustainable where based on conjecture & surmise alone: ITATHonda to set up USD 11 bn EV plant in CanadaImran Khan banned from flaying State InstitutionsI-T - Income from sale of flats cannot be computed in assessee's hands, where legal possession of flats had not been handed over to buyers in that particular AY: ITATPro-Palestine demonstration spreads across US universities; 100 arrestedI-T - Investment activities in venture capital which are not covered in negative list under Schedule III to SEBI Regulations, qualifies for deduction u/s 10(23FB): ITATNATO asks China to stop backing Russia if keen to forge close ties with WestNY top court quashes conviction of Harvey Weinstein in rape case
 
GST may make 'Make in India' a dream in few sectors

AUGUST 29, 2016


By Vimal Pruthi, ACA, LLM

THE National Democratic Alliance (NDA) Government while campaigning for Central elections in 2014,had made billions of people of India, to dream of an India which is free of poverty, unemployment, sluggish growth and much more. With all this to achieve, NDA Government led by Prime Minister Modi has introduced an army of schemes including:

•  Make in India

•  Stand-Up India

•  Digital India

•  Skill India

One of the key initiatives of the Government of India is "Make in India" drive for which the Prime Minister has travelled across the globe to allure foreign manufacturing giants to come and start manufacturing in India.

Further, the NDA Government has made enormous efforts to bring all political parties to agree for the introduction of the much awaited Goods & Service Tax (GST) Law. This is certainly is a big achievement for ease of doing business and consequently a major attraction for foreign manufacturers to setup business in India. Prime Minister Modi has termed the passage of GST Constitutional Amendment Bill in Parliament on 08th August, 2016, "a step towards ending tax terrorism in India". The implementation of proposed GST will make India a "One Tax Nation".

"Make in India" and introduction of GST,both independently have been appreciated by all sections of society. However, the introduction of GST can adversely impact the "Make in India" scheme in few sectors, if the Government does not take remedial measures for this.

Differential Tax Cost under Current Tax Regime:

Under the existing Indirect Tax Laws, the Law makers have time and again resorted to levy of higher countervailing duty in lieu of Excise duty on the import of goods in India as compared to Excise duty levied on similar goods domestically manufactured in India. The differentiation was made to promote manufacturing in India. Few products, on which there is a differential tax regime on import and manufacture in India is depicted below:

S. No.

Product

Countervailing duty on import of goods (CVD) (%)

Excise duty on manufacture of goods in India (%)

1.

Specified Unbranded Readymade Garments

6/12.5

Nil

2.

Battery/Charger/Headset of Mobile Phones

12.5

2

3.

Tablet Computer

12.5

2

4.

Mobile Phones

12.5

1

There are many other products covered under Notification No. 1/2011-CE dated 01/03/2011 on which there is differential duty which lures foreign manufacturers to establish plants for manufacture of such products in India.

Tax Cost under proposed GST Regime:

However, under the draft Model GST Law, Government does not propose any such differential tax structure for import and domestic manufacturing of similar goods (as per current understanding of GST provisions) in India. Thus, at present under the proposed Model GST Law both importer and domestic manufacturer may be subjected to equal rate of GST i.e. 18% (assumed to be Revenue Neutral Rate). Further, the set off of GST payable on supply of goods manufactured in India (i.e. Central and State GST) and GST payable on import (i.e. Integrated GST) will be available without any differentiation. This will de-incentivize the domestic manufacture of specified goods in India under GST regime.

Many foreign companies are making plans to start manufacturing in India, considering the benefit of reduced rate of duty on domestic manufacturing on specified goods under the current tax regime. Incase the benefit of lower duty to domestic manufacturer is not continued under the proposed GST regime, then such tax policy will certainly have a negative impact on the "Make in India" drive of the Government of India and will also demoralize foreign investors those have already made huge investments in India to avail benefit of this differential taxation regime.

In the present situation, there is no legal obligation of the Government to continue with such differential taxation regime. However, it remains the moral obligation of the Government, to continue this benefit of differential taxation even under the proposed GST regime. Further, this differential taxation will keep attracting new investors to "Make in India".

With many representations from various associations being made to Government to protect the interest of domestic manufacturers under GST regime, one can only hope that the Government will consider the same and ensure that the proposed GST and "Make in India" run on the same track.

(The author is Associate Director, PwC Private Ltd. and the views expressed are strictly personal. The author was assisted by Rahul Agarwal (ACA).)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the sites)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.