News Update

ST - Amendment made to FA, 1994 on 14.05.2015 making service tax applicable retrospectively on chit-fund business is only prospective - Refund payable of tax paid between 01.07.2012 to 13.05.2015: HCST - SVLDRS, 2019 - Amnesty Scheme, being of the nature of an exemption from the requirement to pay the actual tax due to the government, have to be considered strictly in favour of the revenue: HCCX - Issue involved is valuation of goods u/r 10A of CE Valuation Rules, 2000 - Appeal lies before Supreme Court: HCCus - Smuggling - A person carrying any article on his belonging would be presumed to be aware of the contents of the articles being carried by him: HCCus - Penalty that could be imposed for smuggling 3.2 kg of gold was Rs.88.40 lakhs, being the value of gold, but what is imposed is Rs.10 lakhs - Penalty not at all disproportionate: HCCus - Keeping in mind the balance of convenience and irreparable injury which may be caused to Revenue, importer to continue indemnity bond of 115 crore and possession of confiscated diamonds to remain with department: HCCus - OIA was passed in October 2022 remanding the matter to adjudicating authority but matter not yet disposed of - Six weeks' time granted to dispose proceedings: HCI-T - High Court need not intervene in matter involving factual issues; petitioner may utilise option of appeal: HCChina asks Blinken to select between cooperation or confrontationI-T - Unexplained cash credit - additions u/s 68 unsustainable where based on conjecture & surmise alone: ITATHonda to set up USD 11 bn EV plant in CanadaI-T - Re-assessment is invalid where based only on a suspicion that income escaped assessment & where not based on concrete reasons to believe for commencing such proceedings : ITATImran Khan banned from flaying State InstitutionsI-T - Income from sale of flats cannot be computed in assessee's hands, where legal possession of flats had not been handed over to buyers in that particular AY: ITATPro-Palestine demonstration spreads across US universities; 100 arrestedI-T - Investment activities in venture capital which are not covered in negative list under Schedule III to SEBI Regulations, qualifies for deduction u/s 10(23FB): ITATNATO asks China to stop backing Russia if keen to forge close ties with WestCus - When Department has not complied with time limit, the order issued for revocation of licence or order issued for continuation of suspension licence cannot sustain: CESTATNY top court quashes conviction of Harvey Weinstein in rape caseWeather prediction normal for phase 2 poll dayIndiGo orders 30 Airbus A350s for long haulsST - Appellant is an 'authorised medical practitioner' providing 'healthcare services' - services exempted in terms of clause 2(i) of notification 25/2012-ST: Commr(A)RBI to issue fresh guidelines for banks to freeze suspected bank accounts being used for cyber crimesREC avails SACE-Covered Green Loan for 60.5 Billion Japanese YenStudy finds Coca-Cola accounts for 11% of branded plastic pollution worldwideCus - 'Small Form-factor Pluggable Optical Transceivers' are classifiable under CTH 8517 7090 and not under CTH 8517 62 90 - entitled for benefit of duty concession under 57/2017-Cus: CESTATDoNER discusses Development of Tourism in North EastCX - Appellant is eligible for exemption under Notfn 12/2012-CE upon fulfilling all conditions stipulated therein, thus sufficiently establishing that goods dealt with by Appellants qualify for exemption: CESTAT
 
Service Tax on Freight Forwarders on Transportation of Goods from India - CBEC Clarifies

DDT in Limca Book of Records - Third Time in a rowTIOL-DDT 2910
16 08 2016

Tuesday

THE Board first recapitulates the provisions of Law as:

1. In terms of rule 10 of the Place of Provision of Services Rules 2012, ('POPS Rules 2012') the place of provision of the service of transportation of goods by air/sea, other than by mail or courier, is the destination of the goods.

2. It follows that the place of provision of the service of transportation of goods by air/sea from a place in India to a place outside India, will be a place outside the taxable territory and hence not liable to service tax.

3. Rule 9 of the POPS Rules 2012, stipulates that the place of provision of intermediary services is the location of the service provider.

4. An intermediary has been defined, inter alia, in rule 2(f) of the POPS Rules 2012, as one who arranges or facilitates the provision of a service or a supply of goods between two or more persons, but does not include a person who provides the main service or supplies the goods on his own account.

And the Board clarifies:

The freight forwarders may deal with the exporters as an agent of an airline/carrier/ocean liner, as one who merely acts as a sort of booking agent with no responsibility for the actual transportation.

In such cases the freight forwarder may be considered to be an intermediary under rule 2(f) read with rule 9 of POPS since he is merely facilitating the provision of the service of transportation but not providing it on his own account. When the freight forwarder acts as an agent of an airline/carrier/ocean liner, the service of transportation is provided by the airline/carrier/ocean-liner and the freight forwarder is merely an agent and the service of the freight forwarder will be subjected to tax while the service of actual transportation will not be liable for service tax under Rule 10 of POPS.

The freight forwarders may also act as a principal who is providing the service of transportation of goods, where the destination is outside India. In such cases the freight forwarders are negotiating the terms of freight with the airline/carrier/ocean liner as well as the actual rate with the exporter. The invoice is raised by the freight forwarder on the exporter. In such cases where the freight forwarder is undertaking all the legal responsibility for the transportation of the goods and undertakes all the attendant risks, he is providing the service of transportation of goods, from a place in India to a place outside India. He is bearing all the risks and liability for transportation. In such cases they are not covered under the category of intermediary, which by definition excludes a person who provides a service on his account.

It follows therefore that a freight forwarder, when acting as a principal, will not be liable to pay service tax when the destination of the goods is from a place in India to a place outside India.

And the Board advises the field:

You may deal with cases purely on the basis of the facts of the case, the terms of contract between the entities concerned, the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994, the POPS Rules 2012 and other rules.

As to what the "other rules" are, it is for the field formations to hunt for!

Circular No. 197/7/2016-ST., Dated August 12 2016

Special Advance Authorization for Apparel - DGFT and CBEC Sync

BY Notification No. 21/2015-2020  dated 11th August 2016, DGFT introduced a new scheme called Special Advance Authorisation Scheme for export of Articles of Apparel and Clothing Accessories of Chapter 61 & 62 of ITC(HS) Classification with effect from 1st September 2016 wherein exporters are entitled for an authorisation for fabrics including inter lining on pre-import basis, and All Industry Rate of Duty Drawback for non-fabric inputs on the exports.

In this Scheme, the exporters are also eligible for All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback as specifically determined by Central Government in which case, for the purpose of value addition norm of para 4.08 of FTP, the value of any other input used on which benefit of Drawback is claimed or intended to claimed has been specified in the DGFT notification as equal to 22% of the FOB value of export realized. However, option to claim drawback determined and fixed by Central Excise Authority (brand rate) under Rule 7 of the Drawback Rules 1995 remains in which case the value of inputs (other than the fabric imported duty free under the Special Advance Authorization) continues to be based on actuals.

To give effect to the Special Advance Authorisation Scheme, the Notification No. 45/2016-Customs dated 13th August, 2016 has been issued providing exemption to fabrics (including interlining) from import duty.

And Notification No.  110/2016-Customs  (NT) dated 13th August, 2016 has been issued providing, subject to the specified conditions, the alternative All Industry Rates (AIRs) of drawback in the Drawback Schedule for the exports made against the Special Advance Authorisation in discharge of export obligations in terms of Notification No. 45/2016-Customs dated 13th August, 2016.

As mentioned above, the scheme comes into force from 1 st September 2016.

The CBEC's Systems Directorate is making all the necessary EDI related arrangements for implementation including specifying the appropriate new scheme code that would need to be declared by exporters making exports under the Special Advance Authorization Scheme cum AIR Drawback.

CBEC Circular No. 37/2016-Customs, Dated: August 13, 2016

EOUs - Out of Bond-age - DGFT syncs with CBEC

BY Notification No. 44/2016-Cus., dated 29.07.2016, the Government has decided to to do away with the need to comply with warehousing provisions by

1. Export Oriented Units (EOUs),

2. Electronics Hardware Technology Park Units (EHTPs),

3. Software Technology Park Units (STPIs) and

4. Bio-Technology Park (BTP) Units

(Please see DDT 2900 01 08 2016). This has come into force from 13.08.2016

Now, the DGFT has also made the required changes in the Foreign Trade Policy and Hand Book of Procedures(HBP) to give effect to the CBEC Notification - also with effect from 13.08.2016. DGFT worked on a Saturday to issue this notification.

DGFT Notification 22/2015-2020., Dated: August 13, 2016

DGFT Public Notice No. 25/2015-2020., Dated: August 13, 2016

Import of Electronic Goods by Post - CIF Value Enhanced.

THIS is rather complicated. If you want to export or import, you should understand at least the following Statutes.

- Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992

- Foreign Trade (Regulation) Rules, 1993

- Foreign Trade (Exemption from application of Rules in certain cases) order, 1993

- Foreign Trade Policy

- Foreign Trade Procedure

- Customs Act, 1962 with its Rules, Regulations, Notifications and Circulars

- Customs Tariff Act, 1975, with its schedules.

And all these are frequently amended.

The amazing fact is that the stakeholders DO keep trek of all this mountain of LAW.

As per a combined understanding of all the above statutes, consumer electronic items of a CIF value not exceeding two thousand rupees can be imported by post.

Writing in our columns in March 2011, Postal Imports - Can Amendments Cut Gordian Knot?, JM Kishore explained:

Foreign Trade (Regulation) Rules, 1993 provide for various aspects relating to licencing. However, The Foreign Trade (Exemption from application of Rules in certain cases) Order, 1993 stipulates several conditions/circumstances for Exemption from the application of these Foreign Trade (Regulation) Rules, 1993.

Accordingly, in terms of the Rule 3(1)(i) of The Foreign Trade (Exemption from application of Rules in certain cases) Order, 1993,

Nothing contained in the Foreign Trade (Regulation) Rules, 1993 shall apply to the import of any goods,

by any person through the post or otherwise for his personal use, or by any institution or hospital for its use except-

xxx

xxx

Provided that the c.i.f value of goods imported as aforesaid at any one time shall not exceed rupees two thousand.

He had suggested that the value limit needs to be revised/enhanced to about Rs.10,000.

Government has now reacted. The limit is enhanced to Rs.50,000/-. The Foreign Trade (Exemption from application of Rules in certain cases) order, 1993, issued in exercise of the powers conferred by the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 [read with the Foreign Trade (Regulation) Rules, 1993, if you please], is amended to enhance the limit to Rs. 50,000/-.

What does it all mean?

You can import by post or air (what is the difference?) articles for your personal use up to a value of Rs. 50,000. It should be noted that this is not duty free as baggage is. The Customs Tariff has a heading 9804 which reads as: 9804 - All dutiable articles, intended for personal use, imported by post or air and the Tariff duty rate is 35%. Nonetheless, Notification 12/2012-Cus provides a concessional rate of duty @10% in terms of sr. no. 517 in respect of all goods imported for personal use.

DGFT Notification 22/2015-2020., Dated: August 12, 2016

Delhi High Court Strikes Down Service Tax on Hotel Accommodation

AS we are trying to enter the arena of GST, the Delhi High Court on Friday struck down the levy of Service Tax on short term accommodation in hotels as it was outside the legislative competence of Parliament and an instance of encroachment by the Union into a field that is completely covered by a State legislation.

The High Court made some interesting observations:

The exemption from service tax on the provision of accommodation for a room having a declared tariff of less than Rs. 1,000 per day or equivalent is by Notification No. 12/2012 dated 17th March 2012. This is not provided in the Act or the Rules. In  Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Kerala v. Larsen and Toubro Ltd. - 2015-TIOL-187-SC-ST, the Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Orissa High Court to the effect that the machinery provisions for levy of the tax could not be provided by instructions and circulars.

Please see 2016-TIOL-1730-HC-DEL-ST

Approval of GST law by parliament has further strengthened our economy and all political parties are worthy of praise for making it possible.

Taxation through GST is also bound to bring equality and a common system that will also unite the country.

There is a class in the country, especially the middle class, the upper middle class, who is more troubled with income- tax officials than the police. I have to change this situation, I am trying and I will change it. But there was a time when an honest Taxpayer would pay his income-tax, even pay extra two rupees so that he does not face any problem. But, once the tax was deposited, he would face difficulties in getting refund. He even had to go to the extent of canvassing and wait endlessly for the refund. Now, we have introduced a system of online refund. Now refund is done within a time frame of 1 to 3 weeks. Those who are watching this telecast on television will also agree that their refund reached them directly, without any application for it. This became possible only due to efforts in making government accountable.

From Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Independence Day Speech

Until Tomorrow with more DDT

Have a nice day.

Mail your comments to vijaywrite@tiol.in


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.