News Update

India received foreign remittance of USD 111 bn in 2022, says UNPitroda resigns as Chairman of Indian Overseas Congress over racist remarkGovt hosts workshop on improving Ease of Doing Business in Mining sectorI-T - Anything made taxable by rule-making authority u/s 17(2)(viii) should be 'perquisite' in form of 'fringe benefits or amenity': SCCus - Drawback - Revenue contends that appeal of exporter ought to have been dismissed by Tribunal as not maintainable since correct remedy was filing a revision application with Central government - Appeal disposed of: HCCus - CHA - AA has clearly brought out the modus adopted by the appellant and how he was a party to the entire under valuation exercise - Factual finding affirmed by Tribunal - No question of law arises for consideration: HCGST - Proper officer has not applied his mind while passing the order; confirmed demand by opining that reply is not satisfactory - Proper Officer is directed to withdraw all punitive actions taken against petitioner pursuant to impugned order: HCGST - Proper Officer had to at least consider the reply on merits and then form an opinion - Non-application of mind - Order set aside and matter remitted for re-adjudication: HCGST - Cancellation of registration for non-filing of returns - Suspension/revocation of license would be counterproductive and works against the interest of revenue - Pragmatic view needs to be taken to permit petitioner to carry on his business: HC86 flights of AI Express cancelled as crew goes on mass sick leaveTax Refund Conundrum - Odyssey of Legal MisstepsI-T- AO not barred from issuing more than one SCN; Fresh SCN seeking information is not without jurisdiction, more so where HC itself directed re-doing of assessment: HCMurthy launches Capacity Building on Design and Entrepreneurship programCash, liquor & drugs worth Rs 110 Cr seized from Jharkhand ahead of pollsI-T- Appeal before CIT(A) (NFAC) is rightly dismissed where it has been delayed by over one year without just & reasonable cause: ITATPoll-induced stress: 2 Bihar officials die of heart attack at polling boothsSixth Edition of Commandants' Conclave held in PuneSome Gujarat villages keep away from polls over unfulfilled demands from governmentRoof-hugging inflation nudges Argentina to print first lot of 10,000 notes of pesoInvestigation finds presence of ‘boys club’ strands of culture at American bank regulatorUS cancels licence to some firms found exporting materials to Huawei
 
Live in present - 'for time being fixed' - interest rates under Service tax

MAY 23, 2016

By G Jayaprakash, Advocate

INTEREST is said to be an integral part of principal and compensatory in nature. Even though the rate of interest payable as per contract between the parties is subject to restrictions imposed by State Governments/ Reserve Bank of India, often this remains on paper and continues to be regulated by the powerful non banking financial institutions.

In the case of default of payment of Duty/Tax, the relevant statute provides provision to collect interest in addition to the tax payable. Central Government fixes the Rate of interest applicable from time to time by issuing Notifications. In relation to Service Tax Section (s)73B/75 of the Finance Act, 1994 stipulates that in case of delayed payments, the assessee is required to pay simple interest at the notified rate for the period of delay.

SECTION-75. Interest on delayed payment of service tax - Every person, liable to pay the tax in accordance with the provisions of section 68 or rules made thereunder, who fails to credit the tax or any part thereof to the account of the Central Government within the period prescribed, shall pay simple interest [at such rate not below ten per cent. and not exceeding thirty-six per cent. per annum, as is for the time being fixed by the Central Government, by notification in the Official Gazette] for the period] by which such crediting of the tax or any part thereof is delayed

[Provided that in the case of a service provider, whose value of taxable services provided in a financial year does not exceed sixty lakh rupees during any of the financial years covered by the notice or during the last preceding financial year, as the case may be, such rate of interest, shall be reduced by three per cent. per annum.]

As in the case of penal provisions under Section(s) 76, 77& 78 of the Act, Section 75 also underwent many amendments and substitutions. Finance Act, 2004 substituted the provision for specific rates with minimum and maximum rates of interest that can be imposed without the proviso as stated above. After substitution, Notification 26/2004-ST dated 10.09.2004 fixed the rate of interest @13%. This rate was increased to 18% vide Notification 14/2011-ST dated 1.3.2011 with effect from 1.4.2011. The proviso to the Section 75 was inserted by Finance Act, 2011 w.e.f 8.4.2011. Notification 12/2014-ST dated 11.07.2014 superseded Notification 26/2004-ST dated 10.09.2004 by specifying applicable rate of interest as per table below:-

Sl.No.

Period of delay

Rate of simple interest

(1)

(2)

(3)

1.

Up to six months

18 per cent.

2.

More than six months and up to one year

18 per cent. for the first six months of delay and 24 per cent. for the delay beyond six months.

3.

More than one year

18 per cent. for the first six months of delay; 24 per cent. for the period beyond six months up to one year and 30 per cent. for any delay beyond one year.

The above Notification is superseded by Notification 13/2016-ST dated 1.3.2016 as below -

Serial Number

Situation

Rate of simple interest

(1)

(2)

(3)

1.

Collection of any amount as service tax but failing to pay the amount so collected to the credit of the Central Government on or before the date on which such payment becomes due.

24 per cent.

2.

Other than in situations covered under serial number 1 above.

15 per cent

The above notification has come into force as the Finance Bill, 2016 has received the assent of the President on 14 th May 2016.

This paper analyses the applicable rate of interest an assessee is liable to pay for default of payment of Service Tax for the period of delay from 2010-11 onwards after enactment of Finance Act, 2016. As shown above, different rates varying from 13% to 30% exists for the above period. Whether an assessee is liable to pay interest at the appropriate rates for the periods during which the relevant notifications were in vogue or at the rate of 15% applicable after the enactment, whichever is beneficial ?

The Section states interest is liable to be paid as is for the time being fixed by the Central Government, by notification in the Official Gazette . What is the relevance of the term “for the time being fixed”? The phrase “ time being fixed” is subjected to judicial interpretation by different High Courts.

The Madhya Pradesh High Court in Devkumarsinghji Kasturchandji v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others reported in AIR 1967 Madhya Pradesh, 268, where the Madhya Pradesh High Court has observed: The general sense of the phrase “for the time being” is that of time indefinite, and refers to indefinite state of facts which will arise in future and which may vary from time to time. See Ellison v. Thomas, (1862) 31 L.J. Ch. 867.

Fortified by the above decision of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, High Court of Bombay in Re:Jayant Fibre Containers Pvt Ltd - 2003-TIOL-634-HC-MUM-CX upheld the applicability of both the Notificationsfor exemption including the one issued later also when two exemption Notifications were available.

From the above judgments it can be seen that since the rate of interest applicable is what is fixed as per Notification for the time being by Central Government, the assessee needs to pay the interest for the period of delay as per rate fixed by the subsequent Notification, for earlier period,if it is beneficial.

That is an assessee can pay an interest @15% after enactment of Finance Act, 2016 (on 14.05.2016) for previous periods when interest rates were higher.

Sounds anachronistic?

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the sites)

 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: interest rates under Service tax

right analysis.we can also take the help of the following
2007-TIOL-09-SC-CX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Civil Appeal No. 3596 of 2005
SUCHITRA COMPONENTS LTD
Vs
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, GUNTUR.
bhayanak rates ko rationalise karke government ne apni galti sudhari hai. it has to be retrospectively.


Posted by Navin Khandelwal
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.