News Update

Govt Clarifies Amendment In Provisions Is Not To Regulate Trade In Cattle But To Prevent CruetyHP Assembly passes GST Bill, 2017Favourable tax structure and largest EEZs make Mauritius a major investment destination: JugnauthDIPP vested with powers to grant defence industrial licencesMissing FCRA return - Final call to NGOsCBEC issues first Mega AGT order of 749 ACs at All-India levelCBEC moves Himani Bhayana from GST Council Secretariat to GST Policy Wing in BoardGadkari launches India’s first fleet of 200 electric vehicles in NagpurMCA Secretary Tapan Ray gets addl charge of Secretary, Economic AffairsIGI Airport Customs seizes gold biscuits worth Rs 80 lakhsMerger of Tribunals & amendments in conditions of Chairpersons and Members - Govt notifies May 26 as the appointed dayTelecom to avail credit of IGST and imported goods: GovtVeteran cop K P S Gill is no more; PM sends condolenceEPFO to consider lowering of contribution to 10%PM inaugurates India’s longest river bridge over Lohit river in AssamI-T - Search - Whether additions can be made in relation to a particular AY without having any incriminating materials qua that AY - NO: HCCBDT promotes five officers as Principal CCITs + issues posting orderTale of Missing Gold from Customs Vault - CBI arrests CustodianI-T - Submission of financial transactions - Deadline is May 31CBDT Panel to peep into nature and type of tax arrearsNITI's 3yr Action Agenda merits timely action to reboot growthI-T - Exemption u/s 54 cannot be denied on ground that residential property was purchased outside India when requirement of making investment in property only in India was subsequently added - ITATCus – CHA license - Licensing authority is not envisaged as an appellant under CHALR, 1984 - Option to appeal is specifically permitted in Regulations only to an aggrieved licensee: CESTATST - Amalgamation proceedings cannot make credit availed of ST paid on royalty charges as improper: CESTATMumbai Air Cargo Customs busts Rs 26 Cr mobile phone smuggling racketNaidu to review progress of Urban Missions in ChhatisgarhDIPP notifies fresh definition of startup in biotechnology sectorProposed GST rates are lower for milk powder, tea, sugar & coffee (See 'GST News' in GST Homepage)Telecom Ministry closely monitoring fall-out of GST: Minister
 
Liability shift in Mutual Fund Sector

FEBRUARY 29, 2016

By Pratik Shah, Jigar Doshi & Ashesh Parekh, SKP Business Consulting LLP

THE Mutual fund (MF)/ Asset Management Company (AMC) was plagued with service tax burden in case of services received from mutual fund agents/distributors under reverse charge mechanism in 2015-2016 due to withdrawal of specific exemption in the Union Budget 2015. This provisionwas re-introduced after a break of 3 years (the same was liable under reverse charge before negative list regime w.e.f 1st July 2012). The principle behind taxing this transaction under reverse charge was due to the practical inability of the Government to have a control check on these agents/distributors.

The mutual fund sector is once again in the news as the Union Budget 2016 vide notification no 18/2016-ST r/w 07/2015-ST has shifted the liability burden for these services wherein services provided by mutual fund agents/distributor to a mutual fund or asset management company are being put under forward charge, i.e. the service provider is being made liable to pay service tax. Although the above amendment will be appreciated by the MF/AMC as they will be relieved from the liability of discharging service tax, the agents/distributors will be in a dilemma (as they will have to register and pay Service tax liability) if their service turnover increases the threshold limit of 10 lakh.

Further, this industry works in a unique way as far as documentation is concerned for services provided by agents/distributors. Currently, given the quantum of agents/distributors and mutual funds, there arealmost no invoices raised by agents/distributors to the funds. A central processing unit such as Computer Age Management Systems (CAMS) processes the spreadsheets and makes the payment to the distributors. Now that these agents/distributors will be covered under the tax net, MF/AMC will have to ensure that the agents/distributors adhere to compliances in terms of invoices, registration, etc. Thismight practically offset the benefitsof CENVAT credit available to the MF/AMC and agents on their input services.

On a positive front, this amendment might reduce the cost for the investor community as the service tax element will be absent in case of services provided by agents/distributors availing threshold exemption. Although the intention of the government to regularise this sector seems very vivid and intense, it would be interesting to see how the Government keeps track of these agents/distributors and checks tax evasion.

The above change is effective from 1 April 2016.

Also see Mutual Fund distribution - Service tax makes a comeback

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the sites)

POST YOUR COMMENTS