News Update

Ghana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsGST - Record does not reflect that any opportunity was given to petitioner to clarify its reply or furnish further documents/details - In such scenario, proper officer could not have formed an opinion - Matter remitted: HCED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in HaryanaGST - Mapping of PAN number with GST number - No fault of petitioner - Respondent authorities directed to activate GST number within two weeks: HCGST - Circular 183/2022 - Petitioner to prove his case that he had received the supply and paid the tax to the supplier/dealer - Matter remitted: HCGST -Petitioner to produce all documents as required under summons -Petitioner to be heard by respondent and a decision to be taken, first on the preliminary issue raised with regard to applicability of CGST/SGST: HCGST - s.73 - Extension of time limit for issuance of order - Notifications 13/2022-CT and 09/2023-CT are not ultra vires s.168A of the Act, 2017: HCSun releases two solar storms - Earth has come in its wayRequisite Checks for Appeals - RespondentInheritance Tax row - A golden opportunity to end 32-years long Policy Paralysis on DTCThe Heat is on: Preserving Earth's Climate in the Face of Global WarmingVAT - Timeline for frefund must be followed mandatorily while recovering dues under Delhi VAT Act: SCIndia, Australia to work closely for collaborative projectsCX - All the information was available to department in 2003 itself, therefore, SCN issued four years after gathering information is not sustainable and is highly barred by limitation: HCPowerful voices of amazing women leaders resonated at UN Hqs75 International visitors from 23 countries arrive to watch world's largest elections unfoldCentre asks States to improve organ donation frequencyCus - Revenue involved in the appeal filed by Commissioner is far below the threshold monetary limit fixed by the CBEC, therefore, department cannot proceed with this appeal - Appeal stands disposed of: HCAdani Port to develop port in PhilippinesUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awarded
 
Cesses on Excise Duty - Is there no levy?

MARCH 16, 2015

By Kalirajan D

"EDUCATION Cess levied on all excisable goods as a duty of excise under section 91 read with section 93 of the Finance Act, 2004 is being fully exempted … Similarly Secondary& Higher Education Cess leviable on excisable goods as a duty of excise under section 136 read with 138 of the Finance Act, 2007 is also being fully exempted "

- Is the statement fully correct?

The above are the initial lines of Annexure II to the TRU Letter issued pursuant to latest Union Budget 2015. It is also stated under the said TRU letter that since there will be no levy of Cesses either on CVD or on Excise Duty, the entries 1A and 1B of Notification No. 23/2003-C.E. dated 31.03.2003 which provided exemption from payment of Education Cess and Secondary Education Cess (hereinafter collectively referred to as 'cesses') leviable on goods supplied by an EOU to DTA, are being omitted by a Notification No. 16/2015-C.E. dated 01.03.2015.The said TRU letter reiterates in various paragraphs that there is no levy of cesses on excise duty.

Notification No. 14/2015-C.E. and No. 15/2015-C.E. both dated 1 st March, 2015 which providing exemption from payment of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess respectively, are notified by virtue of powers conferred under Section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for brevity 'Excise Act').

Now the basic question which emerges is that whether the exemption provided by way of notification issued under Section 5A of the Excise Act would take away the levy itself,though Section 93 of the Finance Act, 2004 and Section 138 of the Finance Act, 2007 which are sections providing for powers to levy cesses are not being omitted.

Will the Budget notification exempt Cesses levied on supplies from EOUs

Though duties levied on excisable goods manufactured by an EOU and brought to any other place in India (hereinafter referred to as 'DTA') are equal to the aggregate of the duties of customs, such duties levied are 'Duties of Excise' only. Therefore exemption from payment of such duties of excise shall be provided by a notification issued under Section 5A of the Excise Act. Moreover, first proviso to the Section 5A prescribes that unless specifically provided in such notification, exemption provided therein shall not apply to goods manufactured by EOUs and brought to DTA. The said proviso reads as follows.

"Provided that, unless specifically provided in such notification, no exemption therein shall apply to excisable goods which are produced or manufactured —

- in a free trade zone or a special economic zone and brought to any other place in India; or

- by a hundred per cent export-oriented undertaking and brought to any place in India"

It follows from the above that since cesses are levied as duty of excise, exemption from payment of such cesses shall be provided by an exemption notification issued under Section 5A of the Act. It is to be noted that mere issuance of exemption notification would not suffice, such notification shall also specifically provide about applicability of notification to supplies from an EOU to DTA.

Though Notification No. 14/2015-C.E and No. 15/2015-C.E. exempt cesses levied on Central Excise Duty, nowhere it provides that such exemption is available for supplies from an EOU to DTA. Therefore exemption provided under these notifications is not available for supplies from an EOU to DTA.

Inadvertently,the entries No. 1A and 1B of the Notification No. 23/2003-C.E. dated 31.03.2003 which provided exemption from payment of cesses on excisable goods supplied by an EOU to DTA have been omitted. Therefore the statement with which this article began may not be correct as there is a levy of cess on excisable goods supplied by EOUs to DTAs.

Before parting…

As the cesses levied on supplies from an EOU to DTA is in the nature of duties of excise there should be an exemption notification issued under Section 5A of the Excise Act and the same shall specifically provide for applicability of exemption provided therein to supplies from an EOU to DTA. Therefore to fully exempt the cesses as said in TRU letter, the following measures may be adopted.

- The entries No. 1A and 1B of Notification No. 23/2003-C.E. dated 31.03.2003 may be restored; or

- The exemption provided under Notification No. 14/2015-C.E. and No. 15/2015-C.E. both dated 01.03.2015 may be made applicable to supplies from an EOUs to DTA also; or

- Section 93 of the Finance Act, 2004 and Section 138 of the Finance Act, 2007 may be omitted with necessary changes in other provisions, so that the cesses would really be subsumed in excise duty.

It would also be a big concern of an assessee that though cesses paid by a DTA unit on procurement of goods from EOUs are available as Cenvat credit, such DTA may not be in a position to utilize the same as cess levied on supplies between units in DTA is exempted. Thus, such accumulated Cenvat credit would become a cost which is a burden on the DTA unit receiving goods from EOU,as a result of inadvertent mistake which has crept in the Union Budget.

[The author is associated with Lakshmi kumaran & Sridharan, Bangalore and the views expressed are personal]

( DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the sites)

 


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: ECS and HS ECS by EOUs for DTA clearance

It is a clear miss on exempting cess for EOU’s DTA clearance

As rightly pointed out by the Author in terms of proviso to Sec.5A of CEA unless otherwise specifically exempted the exemption will not be applicable to EOUs. Intention may be not to levy cess but it has to be expressed according to section provisions.

At least at the time of deleting Sl.no.1A & 1B of Notification No.23/2003-C.E. dated 31.03.2003 this thought would have come to the minds of law makers.

Added non-clarity on provision is explanation by TRU that since there will be no levy of cesses the entries have been deleted in Notification No.23/2003-C.E

Posted by

G.Mani


Posted by govindan_mani govindan_mani
 
Sub: Exemption under section 5A

Withstanding to the facts expressed by the author, I humbly express my opinion as under;
Cess levied u/s. 93 & u/s. 138 of the finance acts ibid is exempted, but u/s. 94 & u/s. 139 is not exempted.
EOUs removing the goods to DTA, pays the ‘duty of excise’, as per notification No.23/2003-C.E. and the notification itself is an exemption notification, issued under Sec. 5A of CEA, wherein it exempts the ‘duty of excise’ payable anything in excess of the duties specified at column(4) of the Table.
For example EOUs removing the goods under Sr.No.2 of the table, liable to pay the ‘duty of excise’, which is equal to the aggregate duties of Customs leviable on like goods, as if imported, subject to the computations given thereof.
Adhering to the Department interpreted computation method of three times cesses on DTA sale, the 1st & 3rd time cesses have been exempted with effect of the Notification No. 14/2015-C.E. & No. 15/2015-C.E. However the 2nd time cesses, remains, as the Cesses payable on the aggregate duties of Customs u/s. 94 & u/s. 139 respectively, is not exempted for imported goods, hence same is to be counted while computing the aggregate ‘duties of excise’.
Prior to the budget cesses payable on customs duties u/s. 94 & u/s. 139 have been specifically exempted for computation ‘duty of excise’ for the EOUs
removing the goods to DTA, vide Sl. 1A & 1B of the notification No.23/2003-C.E. Now, it has been withdrawn, to levy the cesses on par with the goods if imported, in order to give to effect of the withdrawal of the similar exemption given for imported goods under customs notification No. 13/2012 & 14/2012 exempting the cesses on customs duties.
And there is no significance for restoration of 1A & 1B, when EOUs have to pay the duties on ‘duty of excise’ which is equal to the aggregate duties of Customs leviable on like goods, as if imported.
It is apparent that, the Gov’t wants to exempt cesses on central excise duties & levy on import duties.
(Rate of duties payable is 18.67%; if the BCD is 10% & SAD is not computed, assuming sales tax payable.)
Sub rule 7(a) of Cenvat credit rule 3 specified the Cenvat credit eligibility for the DTA units, wherein education cess leviable on the customs duties u/s. 94 & u/s. 139 of Fin Act ibid is not eligible for Cenvat credit. Hence accumulation of Cenvat credit at DTA buyer doesn’t arise.


Posted by vijay shettigar
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.