News Update

India-Ghana Joint Trade Committee meeting held in AccraGhana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsGST - Record does not reflect that any opportunity was given to petitioner to clarify its reply or furnish further documents/details - In such scenario, proper officer could not have formed an opinion - Matter remitted: HCED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in HaryanaGST - Mapping of PAN number with GST number - No fault of petitioner - Respondent authorities directed to activate GST number within two weeks: HCGST - Circular 183/2022 - Petitioner to prove his case that he had received the supply and paid the tax to the supplier/dealer - Matter remitted: HCGST -Petitioner to produce all documents as required under summons -Petitioner to be heard by respondent and a decision to be taken, first on the preliminary issue raised with regard to applicability of CGST/SGST: HCGST - s.73 - Extension of time limit for issuance of order - Notifications 13/2022-CT and 09/2023-CT are not ultra vires s.168A of the Act, 2017: HCSun releases two solar storms - Earth has come in its wayRequisite Checks for Appeals - RespondentInheritance Tax row - A golden opportunity to end 32-years long Policy Paralysis on DTCThe Heat is on: Preserving Earth's Climate in the Face of Global WarmingVAT - Timeline for frefund must be followed mandatorily while recovering dues under Delhi VAT Act: SCIndia, Australia to work closely for collaborative projectsCX - All the information was available to department in 2003 itself, therefore, SCN issued four years after gathering information is not sustainable and is highly barred by limitation: HCPowerful voices of amazing women leaders resonated at UN Hqs75 International visitors from 23 countries arrive to watch world's largest elections unfoldCentre asks States to improve organ donation frequencyCus - Revenue involved in the appeal filed by Commissioner is far below the threshold monetary limit fixed by the CBEC, therefore, department cannot proceed with this appeal - Appeal stands disposed of: HCAdani Port to develop port in PhilippinesUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awarded
 
Fate of EC & SHE Cess under Central Excise law

MARCH 10, 2015

By Jigar Parikh, CA

IN the recent budget proposal for the year 2015-16, Notification No. 14/2015–CE and 15/2015–CE both dated 01.03.2015 have been issued exempting the levy of Education cess (EC) and Secondary & Higher Education Cess (SHEC) respectively. Till 28 th February, 2015 many of the manufacturers would have the accumulated balance in the said EC and SHEC (jointly together hereinafter referred as Cesses). However, currently no such exemption is granted under service tax and accordingly there arises disparity and the service provider are at advantageous position as they are eligible for utilisation of Cesses.

Due to immediate effect of the aforesaid notifications, there will be unused pool of Cesses in the cenvat record as well as in the books of account. By virtue of exemption, the said Cesses for now will become slow moving item for the purpose of balance sheet of a manufacturer going forward.

This is more so for the reason that under Rule 3 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, the balance of Cesses can be utilised only and only for the purpose of making the payment of Cesses. In such scenario do not get tempted for writing off the Cesses! The opening balance as on 1 st March 2015 should continue to be reflected in the periodic returns filed under central excise provisions.

It is to be noted that the levy of Cesses has only become exempt and the same has not been subsumed in the basic rate of duty. Hence, those Cesses cannot otherwise be used for paying the basic duty. In such scenario, the slow-moving item i.e. Cesses will be required to be utilised as part of CENVAT credit under the following scenarios:

1. For making payment of past liability that may arise in the future during the course of audit etc. in which there will be duty as well as Cesses.

2. The inputs are removed as such on/after 1 st March 2015 and said inputs were procured before 1 March 2015; such inputs would have suffered the Cesses at the time of availing credit and accordingly‘as such 'remova lof such inputs mandates reversal of Cesses though from 1st March 2015 it has been exempted. Further, effect of such will be required to be reflected in the periodic return filed by the manufacturer.

3. The dealer / importer is required to pass on duty/Cess which has been received from the manufacturer. In the event, if the manufacturer procures goods on/after 1 st March 2015, it is likely that a dealer will issue invoice containing Cesses (2% and 1%) as well as basic duty. This could be for the reason that the dealer had procured the goods before 1 st March 2015 during which the levy of Cesses were in force and he will obviously recover the same from his customer/consignee.

4. Similarly, when goods are consigned to depot before 1 st March 2015 and cleared from depot on/after 1 st March 2015, the requisite Cesses are required to be passed on.

5. Also, during removal of capital goods after use, the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 prescribes a mechanism under Rule 3(5A) to compute the duty to be paid. In such cases also the Cesses are required to be reversed.

6. As per Rule 3(5B) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, writing off the inputs or unused capital goods requires reversal equal to credit availed. Where the goods are procured before 1 st March 2015 is written off on/after 1 st March 2015, there arises a need to reverse the Cesses.

7. Finished goods cleared on payment of duty before 1 st March 2015 are returned for the purpose of re-made, refined or re-conditioning in the factory, the manufacturer can claim the credit on the same. If the process to which the goods being subjected to does not amount to manufacture, then as per Rule 16 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, at the time of clearance the same, manufacturer is required to pay duty equal to Cenvat credit taken earlier. This inter-alia means that Cesses are required to be paid.

8. Rule 21 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 provides for remission of duty for the goods that are not fit for market consumption or destroyed by natural cause or unavoidable accident. In such an eventuality, as per Rule 3(5C) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 when the remission is granted, the manufacturer is required to reverse the cenvat credit of the input used in production of said goods and input service used in or in relation to production of said goods. Accordingly, Cesses are required to be reversed if the credit was taken with respect to input / input service.

9. A merchant exporter who has already obtained CT-1 based on the proforma invoice for which the clearance of goods will occur from factory of manufacturer on/after 1 st March, 2015, is required to cancel the CT-1 and get the fresh CT-1 issued as there will arise mismatch of duty if old CT-1 and new ARE-1 is kept on record. Similarly, transactions related to CT-3, ARE-3 will also be affected.

Thus for the aforesaid reason, it is desirable to carry forward the Cesses in the CENVAT record. Further, till the day the rate of service tax is increased to 14%, a manufacturer receiving various input services containing Cesses should continue to avail the credit of Cesses and mention the same in periodic excise returns.

( DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the sites)

 


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Cesses balances

The above is a very good analysis of various provisions under which cesses are required to be reversed. After all these scenarios, if cesses balances still hold, the assessees have to carry out the same for a longer period till cesses are imposed again for utilization of the same. We hope such cesses are not imposed again. A long time ago there was a provision to refund the PLA balance. Similarly, these cesses are nothing but the tax paid on inputs. In Exports too, refund is allowed when the assessee is unable to utilize the credit. So, the Government should introduce a mechanism to either refund these cesses or allow the assessee to utilize for payment of Cenvat.

Posted by Napolean B
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.