News Update

9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATSwati Maliwal case takes new turn with Kejriwal’s assistant Bibhav Kumar filing FIR against herI-T- Unexplained money - Additions sustained as assessee unable to provide proper explanation for amount withdrawn & subsequently deposited into same bank account: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATPutin says NO to Macron’s call for ceasefire in Ukraine during OlympicsCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATBrazil to host women’s World Cup 2027Cus - If there is additional consideration for sale, then proper course for the officer is to reject transaction value & re-determine value under Rule 4 or Rule 5 or Rule 6 sequentially: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
Section 73(4B) of FA, 1994 needs an explanation

FEBRUARY 25, 2015

By S Sivakumar, LL.B., FCA, FCS, ACSI, MBA, Advocate

THE Government introduced sub-section (4B) to Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994, with effect from 6-8-2014. It seems that the purpose of introducing this sub-section was to make the Service Tax Department adhere to some deadlines for completion of the adjudication matters. The said Sub-section reads as follows:

[(4B) The Central Excise Officer shall determine the amount of service tax due under sub-section (2)

(a) within six months from the date of notice where it is possible to do so, in respect of cases whose limitation is specified as eighteen months in sub-section (1);

(b) within one year from the date of notice, where it is possible to do so, in respect of cases falling under the proviso to sub-section (1) or the proviso to sub-section (4A).]

One would have been amused to go through the language used in the sub-section, inasmuch as, the sub-section which uses the word 'shall' also states that, the time frame mentioned therein is applicable, only where it is possible for the Central Excise Officer to do so. This is a typical case of the all powerful Tax Babu thwarting any attempt by the newly elected political establishment to impose any time frame on the adjudication system, which in any case, is proceeding at a snail's pace.

I have seen the Departmental officers including the Commissioners trying to adhere to the time frames set up by this sub-section in respect of show cause notices issues after August 2014. But, it seems clear that, they are not bothered about the show cause notices issues prior to August 2014as there are cases which are pending to be decided, even after the conclusion of personal hearings, for years together. There are also instances, where, show cause notices (I am not referring to protective show cause notices here) have been issued years ago and replies submitted, awaiting intimation of personal hearings for years.

There are also cases where the Commissioners are taking up for adjudication, show cause notices issued after 6-8-2014, courtesy Section 73(4B), while show cause notices issued for the past periods on the same issues, are pending at the desks of our super-efficient Commissioners. It seems that the Commissioners are clear that, this sub-section is not applicable to show cause notices issues prior to August 6, 2014, while such an inference does not flow from a plain reading of the sub-section.

Be that as it may….most unfortunately, the sub-section (4B) is ludicrously worded, to be of any use.The time frame for completion of adjudication proceedings cannot be left to the mercy of the adjudicating officers. One can draw a parallel from Sections 143 and 144 of the Income tax Act, 1961, in terms of which, it is mandatory for the Income tax Department to complete scrutiny assessments within two years from the end of the relevant assessment year. In fact, we see time frames being fixed for assessments and re-assessments including those involving complicated transfer pricing cases, under the income tax law. Where then, is the justification to give a long rope to our most brilliant service tax Commissioners to complete adjudication proceedings only when, it is ‘possible to do so'?

The Government should also extend the provisions of Section 73(4B) to show cause notices prior to 6-8-2014, as well. An Explanation below this sub-section should make matters clear.

As all of us know, refund claims filed by exporters are left pending for years together, at the offices of the Service Tax Department. It is very important that provisions similar to sub-section (4B) are introduced to ensure speedy disposal of refund claims filed by exporters.It would also be good to have such provisions for disposal of appeals by the Appellate Commissioners, as well. It does not augur well for a Government which, talks of a non-adversarial tax administration every now and then, to fix a time frame for completion of adjudication proceedings involving levy of and collection of tax and keep mum in respect of proceedings involving granting of refunds.

( DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the sites)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.