News Update

CLAT 2024 exams to be held on Dec 1NCGG commences Programme for officials of TanzaniaGST - Appellate Authority has not noticed the provisions of Section 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 which mandates that the day on which the judgment complained of was pronounced, is also to be excluded: HCDefence Secretary commends BRO for playing major role in country's securityGST - If the Proper Officer was of the view that the reply filed was insufficient, he could have sought more clarification - Without providing any such opportunity, impugned order could not have been passed - Matter remanded: HCSC holds influencers, celebrities equally accountable for misleading adsGST - Notice requiring petitioner to furnish additional information/clarification does not mention that petitioner had to appear for personal hearing - Since no opportunity of personal hearing was given, order is unsustainable: HCIndian Naval ships arrive at Singapore; to head towards South China SeaGST - For the purposes of DNB and FNB courses, petitioner clearly falls within the scope of an educational institution imparting education to students enrolled with it as a part of a curriculum - Services exempted: HCIndia's MEDTECH industry holds immense potential: Dr Arunish ChawlaKejriwal’s judicial custody extended till May 20GST - Candidates appearing for the screening tests are not students of the petitioner - Petitioner's claim of exemption on such examination fees is unmerited: HCBrisk voting reported from all 96 LS seats; PM casts vote in AhmedabadGST - NEET examinations are in the nature of an entrance examination - Petitioner would be entitled to the benefit of an exemption by virtue of Serial No.66(aa) of the 2017 Notification, which came into effect on 25.01.2018: HCIndia calls back half of troops stationed at MaldivesIndia-Australia DTAA: Economic Statecraft through TaxRBI alerts against misuse of banking channels for facilitating illegal forex tradingTime Limit to file Appeal in GST Appellate TribunalEC censures Jagan Reddy & Chandrababu Naidu for MCC violationsFrance tells Xi Jinping EU needs protection from China’s cheap importsI-T- Addition cannot be made merely for reason that assessee got property transferred through registered sale without making payment to vendor: ITATI-T- Addition which is not based on the reasons for reopening is un-sustainable sans notice u/s 148 of the ACT: ITATOxygen valve malfunction delays launch of Boeing’s first crewed spacecraftFM administers Oath to Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra as first President of GST TribunalGhana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in Haryana
 
CX - Export of Biscuits - any exemption given on basis of MRP applies to goods sold in India & has no application whatsoever for identical goods exported - CENVAT admissible on inputs/input services: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JUNE 13, 2014: THE appellants are manufacturers of biscuits.

Biscuits manufactured by them and having a Retail Sales Price (RSP) of less than Rs.100/- per Kg. are exempted from CE duty in terms of Serial no. 18A of the Table annexed to Notification 3/2006-CE dated 01/03/2006 as amended.

But obviously, in respect of such biscuits, the appellant does not avail any CENVAT credit on the Inputs or Input Services.

Incidentally, the same biscuits are also manufactured and exported under bond without payment of duty in terms of Rule 19 of the CER, 2002. And the appellant avails CENVAT credit on the Inputs/Input Services used in the manufacture of the said biscuits.

The Revenue is of the view that the CENVAT credit availed is incorrect and the ground taken is that the goods are exempted from excise duty when sold in the domestic market.

The adjudicating authority viz. CCE, Thane-I found this 'biscuit and CENVAT' allegation of the Revenue to be a tantalizing one so much that he confirmed the demand of Rs.80.08 lakhs and imposed an equivalent penalty and interest.

Against these adjudged dues, the appellant is before the CESTAT.

Their primary submission is that the requirement of affixing MRP under the SWAM Act, 1976 read with the Packaged Commodities Rules, 1977 applies only to goods sold in India in retail and does not apply to goods exported. Therefore, the exemption provided under Serial no. 18A applies only to the goods sold in the domestic market and has no application whatsoever in respect of export products. Consequently, there is no bar in availing the CENVAT credit on the inputs/input services used in or in relation to the manufacture thereof. They have also sought the support of Board Circular no. 625/16/2002-CX dated 28/02/2002 wherein it is clarified that RSP is not required to be printed in certain specified situations and one of the situations mentioned in the said Circular is "goods meant for export".

The Bombay High Court decision in Repro India Ltd. 2007-TIOL-795-HC-MUM-CX holding that CENVAT credit is admissible on inputs/input services used in or in relation to manufacture of goods exported, even if such goods are exempt when sold in the domestic market, is also relied upon. It is, therefore, pleaded that the Rs.1.60 crore confirmed demand should be set aside and the appeal be allowed.

There was nothing more that the Revenue representative could add except parroting the findings of the adjudicating authority.

The Bench made the following pithy observations -

"5.1 Law made in India applies to the whole of India or within the territory situated in India. They do not have extra territorial jurisdiction. This applies to Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977. Therefore, the requirement of affixing MRP is only meant for goods required to be sold in India and it has nothing to do with the goods exported. Therefore, any exemption given on the basis of MRP applies to goods sold in India and has no application whatsoever in respect of identical goods exported. The case laws cited by the appellants also confirm these facts. As held by the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in Repro India Ltd. case (cited supra), even in respect of exempted goods, CENVAT credit can be availed on inputs/input services if such goods are exported."

In fine, holding that there was no merit in the order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane-I , the same was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.

In passing : Some chai pe charcha this…

(See 2014-TIOL-1018-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.