News Update

I-T - Anything made taxable by rule-making authority u/s 17(2)(viii) should be 'perquisite' in form of 'fringe benefits or amenity': SCCus - Drawback - Revenue contends that appeal of exporter ought to have been dismissed by Tribunal as not maintainable since correct remedy was filing a revision application with Central government - Appeal disposed of: HCCus - CHA - AA has clearly brought out the modus adopted by the appellant and how he was a party to the entire under valuation exercise - Factual finding affirmed by Tribunal - No question of law arises for consideration: HCGST - Proper officer has not applied his mind while passing the order; confirmed demand by opining that reply is not satisfactory - Proper Officer is directed to withdraw all punitive actions taken against petitioner pursuant to impugned order: HCGST - Proper Officer had to at least consider the reply on merits and then form an opinion - Non-application of mind - Order set aside and matter remitted for re-adjudication: HCGST - Cancellation of registration for non-filing of returns - Suspension/revocation of license would be counterproductive and works against the interest of revenue - Pragmatic view needs to be taken to permit petitioner to carry on his business: HC86 flights of AI Express cancelled as crew goes on mass sick leaveTax Refund Conundrum - Odyssey of Legal MisstepsI-T- AO not barred from issuing more than one SCN; Fresh SCN seeking information is not without jurisdiction, more so where HC itself directed re-doing of assessment: HCMurthy launches Capacity Building on Design and Entrepreneurship programCash, liquor & drugs worth Rs 110 Cr seized from Jharkhand ahead of pollsI-T- Appeal before CIT(A) (NFAC) is rightly dismissed where it has been delayed by over one year without just & reasonable cause: ITATPoll-induced stress: 2 Bihar officials die of heart attack at polling boothsSixth Edition of Commandants' Conclave held in PuneSome Gujarat villages keep away from polls over unfulfilled demands from governmentI-T- Re-assessment unsustainable, where based on third party statements & not corroborated by incriminating evidence: ITATRoof-hugging inflation nudges Argentina to print first lot of 10,000 notes of pesoI-T- Re-assessment invalidated where triggerred by change of opinion, on account of being based on material already available during original assessment: ITATInvestigation finds presence of ‘boys club’ strands of culture at American bank regulatorST - Civil work for construction of tower in port area, is exempt from tax as per Notfn No 25/2007-ST; constructing draining pipes for municipal corporation is not commercial activity & so no Service Tax is payable thereon: CESTATUS alleges Russia shipping oil to North Korea more than UN-fixed quotaCus - That appellants were aware of dutiable nature of Gold found from baggage & of procedure for declaration at Customs, reveals intent to smuggle said Gold without payment of tax - conditions for valid import of Gold not satisfied either; absolute confiscation upheld: CESTATUS cancels licence to some firms found exporting materials to HuaweiCX - Excise duty is determines based on how goods are cleared - What happens to goods post their removal, is not manufacturer's lookout, unless manufacturer is involved in fraud or wilful mis-declaration: CESTATRenewables accounted for 30% of global power supply in 2023: StudyCX - Manufacturer of Single Sugar Phosphate (SSP) meant for agricultural use, cannot be held liable for use of SSP for industrial purposes, by a tertiary purchaser of SSP: CESTATCLAT 2024 exams to be held on Dec 1ST - Since the demand itself is not sustainable, question of demanding interest and imposing penalty does not arise: CESTAT
 
I-T - Whether Revenue is under obligation to allow TDS Credit even if deductors have not issued TDS Certificates nor properly uploaded details in Form 26AS - YES: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, OCT 22, 2013: THE issue before the Bench is - Whether Revenue is under obligation to allow TDS Credit even if deductors have not issued TDS Certificates nor properly uploaded details in Form 26AS. And the verdict goes in favour of the assessee.

Facts of the case

Assessee, a company, had claimed TDS of Rs. 215163912, out of which claim of Rs. 1,65,20,93,44/- was made in the original return and further claim of Rs.14,271,296 was made in the revised return filed on 13.4.2009. Thereafter during assessment, assessee had made further claim of Rs. 35,683,272/- vide letter dated 28.12.2010. AO however gave TDS credit only to the tune of Rs 118,960,393/-. On appeal, CIT(A) directed the assessee to furnish all TDS certificates in original before AO, who was directed to verify the claim of credit of TDS and to allow TDS as per original challans available on record or as per details of such TDS available on computer system of the department.

On appeal before the Tribunal, the AR submitted that the AO disallowed the TDS credit because of the discrepancy with respect to the credit shown in the Form No. 26AS which was not correct. It was argued that credit of TDS had to be given on the basis of TDS certificates and in case TDS certificates were not available, on the basis of details and evidence furnished by the assessee regarding deduction of tax at source. Reference was made to the recent judgment of Delhi HC in case of Court On Its Own Motion Vs. CIT, in which the HC directed the department to ensure that the credit was given to the assessee on the basis of details and evidences furnished, where the deductor did not upload the correct details in Form 26AS. It was further pointed out that new system of Form 26AS was applicable only from AY 2009-10 and was not applicable in the case of the assessee. Therefore, it was requested that the Department might be directed to allow TDS credit on the basis of TDS certificate or indemnity bond and on the basis of credit shown in the form 26AS.

Having heard the parties, the Tribunal held that,

++ difficulty faced by the tax payer in the matter of credit of TDS had been considered by the High Court of Bombay in case of Yashpal Sahwney Vs. DCIT in which it was held that even if the deductor had not issued TDS certificate, the claim of the assessee has to be considered on the basis of evidence produced for deduction of tax at source as the Revenue was empowered to recover the tax from the person responsible if he had not deducted tax at source or after deducting failed to deposit with Central Government. High Court of Delhi in case of Court On Its Own Motion Vs. CIT have also directed the department to ensure that credit is given to the assessee, where deductor had failed to upload the correct details in Form 26AS on the basis of evidence produced before the department. Therefore, the department was required to give credit for TDS once valid TDS certificate had been produced or even where the deductor had not issued TDS certificates on the basis of evidence produced by assessee regarding deduction of tax at source and on the basis of indemnity bond. We, therefore modify the order passed by CIT(A) on this point and direct the AO to proceed in the manner discussed above to give the credit of tax deducted at source to the assessee;

++ second dispute is regarding grant of interest on interest. It has been submitted by AR that the assessee was entitled for interest on the excess tax paid which had not been given to assessee and, therefore, from the due date of interest, further interest had to be allowed on the interest due. Reliance has been placed on the judgment of SC in case of Sandvik Asia Ltd. Vs. CIT And Others. In case the assessee has paid excess advance tax or excess TDS, the assessee is liable for refund with interest and in case the interest is not granted on the due date, the assessee is liable for further interest on interest, in view of the Judgment of Supreme Court in case of Sandvik Asia Ltd. Vs. CIT and others. We, therefore, direct the AO to allow the assessee interest on interest if due as per law in the light of Judgment of Supreme Court in case of Sandvik Asia Ltd.

(See 2013-TIOL-885-ITAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.