News Update

Govt scraps ban on export of onionFormer Delhi Congress chief Arvinder Singh Lovely joins BJP with three moreUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha ElectionsGST - Once Appellate Authority comes to the conclusion that SCN was issued by an officer who was not competent; reply was also considered by an incompetent authority and the Competent Authority had not applied its independent mind, Appellate Authority could not have assumed original jurisdiction and proceeded further with the matter: HC7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farI-T - Initial burden of proof rested on assessee to substantiate his claim of having incurred expenditure on improvement of property: ITATTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresI-T - Agricultural income can be treated by ITO as undisclosed income in absence of any substantial / corroborative material to prove same: ITATCanada arrests three persons in alleged killing of Sikh separatistI-T - Income from sale of property has to be classified & characterised only in manner of computation as per section 45(2): ITATCus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political events
 
Negative List of Services: Implications for Advocates and Law Firms

JULY 02, 2012

By Joseph Prabakar

AS part of the Negative List of Services concept, the Government, vide Notification No 25/2012 dated 20.06.2012, has specified 39 categories of transactions/activities which are exempt from Service Tax.

I reproduce below Entry Sl No 6 of Notification No 25/2012 dated 20.06.2012, which provides for exemption for Legal Services rendered by Advocates, Law Firms and Arbitral Tribunal.

6. Services provided by-

(a) an arbitral tribunal to -

(i) any person other than a business entity; or

(ii) a business entity with a turnover up to rupees ten lakh in the preceding financial year;

(b) an individual as an advocate or a partnership firm of advocates by way of legal services to,-

(i) an advocate or partnership firm of advocates providing legal services;

(ii) any person other than a business entity; or

(iii) a business entity with a turnover up to rupees ten lakh in the preceding financial year; or

(c) a person represented on an arbitral tribunal to an arbitral tribunal;'

In the present discussion, as we are concerned only with services rendered by Advocates/ Law Firms,I reproduce below Clause (b) of Entry Sl No 6 of Notification No 25/2012 dated 20.06.2012.

(b) an individual as an advocate or a partnership firm of advocates by way of legal services to,-

(i) an advocate or partnership firm of advocates providing legal services;

(ii) any person other than a business entity; or

(iii) a business entity with a turnover up to rupees ten lakh in the preceding financial year; or

I List of transactions/ activities which are exempt from Service Tax

On an analysis of each limb of Clause (b) of Entry Sl No 6 of Notification No 25/2012 dated 20.06.2012, it may be noted that the following services rendered by Individual Advocates are exempt from payment of Service Tax from 01.07.2012.

(i) Legal Services provided by an individual as an advocate to another individual advocate

(ii) Legal Services provided by an individual as an advocate to a partnership firm of advocates providing legal services.

(iii) Legal Services provided by an individual as an advocate to any person other than a business entity.

(iv) Legal Services provided by an individual as an advocate to a business entity with a turnover below Rs 10 Lakhs in the previous financial year.

Similarly, the following services rendered by PartnershipFirm of Advocates are exempt from payment of Service Tax from 01.07.2012.

(i) Legal Services provided by a partnership firm of advocates to an individual advocate.

(ii) Legal Services provided by a partnership firm of advocates to another partnership firm of advocates.

(iii) Legal Services provided by a partnership firm of advocates to any person other than a business entity.

(iv) Legal Services provided by a partnership firm of advocates by way of legal services to a business entity with a turnover below Rs 10 Lakhs in the preceding financial year.

II Meaning of Legal Services

Please note that originally, in Notification No.12/2012 dated 17.03.2012, the term used was “ Services provided by an Individual as an Advocate ”. Now, under Notification No.25/2012 dated 20.06.2012, the term used is “ Services Provided by an Individual Advocate byway of Legal Services. Therefore it may be noted that the exemption under Notification No.25/2012 dated 20.06.2012 would apply to individual advocates for rendering legal services only. Legal services would include Advice, Consultancy, Technical Assistance in legal matters and Appearance before Courts and various judicial and quasi judicial authorities.

For example, if an individual advocate in practice is also engaged in real estate consultancy/share broking etc., then the exemption under Serial No.6 of Notification No.25/2012 dated 20.06.2012 would be restricted to receipts towards rendering legal services only. In other words, exemption would not be available for receipts towards real estate consultancy/share broking or any other activity.

III Concept of Business Entity

As regards exemption for services provided to ‘ persons other than Business Entity ', it may be noted that when an individual advocate renders any service to any person who receives such services in his capacity as an individual, then such legal services would be exempt from payment of Service Tax. To illustrate, if an Individual Advocate appears in the Family Court for some personal issue for, say, Mr. Gowtham, the said services would be exempt from payment of Service Tax.

Now, if the same Individual Advocate renders services toMr. Gowtham,Proprietor of Gowtham & Co, relating to the business of Gowtham & Co, then the said legal services would be charged to service tax. However, under the reverse charge method, in terms of Sl No 5 of Notification No. 30/2012-ST, dated June 20, 2012, the liability to pay service tax would be shifted to Gowtham & Co which is a Business Entity which receives the said legal services.Thus, normally,legal services rendered by an individual advocate to a Business Entity would be chargeable to service tax in the hands of the service receiver. Therefore, while an individual advocate rendering legal services would not be liable to pay service tax under any circumstances, legal services rendered by an individual advocate to Business Entity (subject to Clause (iii) of Entry Sl No 6) would be taxable. Thus, as a natural corollary, the question of an individual advocate obtaining registration under service tax would simply not arise.

IV Exemption based on Turnover below Rs 10 Lakhs and reverse charge method

I will now analyse the exemption provided for Business Entity with a turnover below Rs.10 lakhs. Please note that, normally legal services rendered by an individual advocate to a Business Entity would be liable to service tax and the liability to pay service tax would be on the Business Entity receiving the said legal services. The liability to pay service tax by the Business Entity is under the reverse charge method in terms of Sl No 5 of Notification No. 30/2012-ST, dated June 20, 2012. Thus, technically a small businessman, irrespective of his turnover, would be liable to pay service tax under reverse charge method for making any payment to an individual advocate for legal services. In fact, this is the position presently under GTA services. In order to mitigate the difficulty, as a benevolent measure, the Government had provided for an exemption from service tax for those Business Entities whose turnover in the previous financial year is less than Rs.10 lakhs.

I would illustrate this by way of an example. Mr.Srinivasan, an individual Advocate renders legal services to two Business Entities, namely A & Co Pvt Ltd and B& Co both in July 2012. The turnover of A & Co Pvt Ltd for the year 2011-12 is Rs.10 Crores and the turn over of B & Co for the year 2011-12 is Rs.8 Lakhs. In the above scenario, the services rendered by Mr Srinivasan to A & Co Pvt Ltd would be taxable and the person liable to pay service tax would be A & Co Pvt Ltd. However, services rendered by Mr Srinivasan to B & Co would be exempt and hence neither Mr Srinivasan nor M/s B & Co would be liable to pay service tax on this transaction since the turnover of M/s B & Co for the previous financial year is below Rs.10 lakhs.

The crucial point to note here is that irrespective of the turnover of the Business Entity to whom the services are rendered, ( A & Co Pvt Ltd or B & Co) the individual advocate, would not be liable to pay service tax. Secondly, the turnover limit of Rs.10 lakhs fixed for the Business Entity would apply to the respective Business Entity which receives the legal services.

A doubt had arisen as to whether service tax would be applicable if the turnover limit of the Business Entity receiving the legal services exceeds Rs.10 lakhs. It may be noted that the turnover limit prescribed under Sl No 6 (b) (iii) of Notification No.25/2012 dated 20.06.2012 is only with reference to the Business Entity and there is no requirement of payment of service tax and registration with service tax authority for an individual advocate even where the turnover of the receiving Business Entity exceeds Rs.10 lakhs. In other words the turnover limit of Rs.10 lakhs would only facilitate small businesses to avoid registration and payment of service tax under reverse charge method when the small businessman pays a fee for legal services. So, it is for a Business Entity to take a decision as to whether they should pay Service Tax or not under reverse charge method under Notification No 30/2012, when the Business Entity pays a fee for legal services.

Please note that the Law Firms are also on the same footing as an individual advocate and the analysis and examples would apply equally to Law Firms. In fact, those law firms who are presently registered and paying Service Tax can surrender their registration and stop making payment of Service Tax on and from July 1, ,2012.

(The Author is a Chennai based Advocate)


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Threshold exemption of 10L

The exemption of 10 Lacs would not be available to a recipient. In this regard Notification No 33/2012 ST which clarifies that

Provided that nothing contained in this notification shall apply to,-
(i) taxable services provided by a person under a brand name or trade name, whether registered or not, of another person; or
(ii) such value of taxable services in respect of which service tax shall be paid by such person and in such manner as specified under sub-section (2) of section 68 of the said Finance Act read with Service Tax Rules,1994.

Posted by G J Mendonca
 
Sub: BUSINESS ENTITY

In case an individual does business / profession in his individual name without setting up a proprietorship concern, is he still liable to discharge service tax on fees paid to lawyer.

If such individual is in employment and also does business of say commission agent in personal name, what are the times to be reckoned for turnover of 10 lakhs. Only the turnover from the business of brokerage or even the salary earned from employer and whatever shares that are sold for capital gains. Are income from other sources like interest from bank also to be included in the turnover of 10 lakhs if individual chooses to do business or profession in his individual name?

Posted by Sunil Chowdhary
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.