News Update

GST - Govt notifies fresh tax rates for GTA + renting of motor cab + jobwork of printing of newspapers & journals + composite supply of works contract to Govt agencies + exempts services provided by and to FIFA + services by Fair Price Shop + Crop Insurance Schemes + LLP to be construed as Partnership firm + services of plumbing & house-keeping through e-commerce platforms liable to registrationNITI Aayog To Launch 'Mentor India' CampaignFM reviews macro economic stability of economyMoS, PMO calls for 'Make in India' health moduleI-T - Whether Explanation to Sec 37(1) gets attracted even if there is no specific material to suggest participation of assessee in alleged kickbacks - NO: HCTreading the GST Path XXX What is "cab"?Apex Court rules Triple Talaq is unconstitutionalTrump warns Pakistan against providing shelter to terror groupsITC claim on Railway Receipt in lieu of Tax InvoiceComposite and mixed supply under GST - Golmaal ReturnsHM launches Digital Police Portal; FIRs can now be filed online in 34 States & UTsI-T - Contributions to provident fund not recognized as valid deduction u/s 80C(2)(vi), is deemed as short-deductions u/s 192 and hence taxable as 'Income from other sources' : ITATIndia's exclusive rights to explore polymetallic nodules from seabed extendedCX - Being busy with procedural requirement under GST is no ground to grant adjournment: CESTATChennai Airport Customs seizes gold worth Rs 4.6 Crore; One person arrestedGovt appoints CISF ADG Dharmendra Kumar as DG of Railway Protection ForceGlobal Forum releases compliance ratings for 10 tax jurisdictions (See 'Brief' in 'TII')PM for soil testing by hand-held devices; calls for involving startupsST - Warehouses are specifically covered under term Railways and they need not necessarily belong to railways - no tax liability on construction of warehouse for CWC in railway premises: CESTATTourism earns about Rs 15000 Cr in July monthPM congratulates OPS being sworn as TN Dy CM; to be Finance Minister alsoI-T - Whether even if assessee returns no exempt income in a particular AY, disallowance of certain expenditure incurred to earn such exempt income is warranted u/s 14 rw Rule 8D - NO: HCImport policy of Urad / Moong dal is revised from 'free' to ‘restricted’CX - When Tribunal decides that goods are exempted under notf. 50/2003, it would have direct impact on rate of duty, therefore, appeal would lie before SC: HCI-T - Remuneration paid to Artist for loss of business occasioned by virtue of non-compete agreement, is revenue receipt, if she is allowed to work elsewhere subject to payment of 5% of her earnings: HCPower Minister calls for 3Ds approach - De-carbonisation, decentralisation & digitalisationMAT Report - CBDT notifies New Form 29B with exhaustive AnnexureWhether the Government has allowed Tax payable under reverse charge to be paid through ITC? (See 'TOG Insight' in Taxongo.com)Domestic Airlines carried 657 lakhs pax between Jan to July, 2017 - A growth of 17% in trafficInter-state supply-who is liable to pay IGST?Rosneft, Russian energy giant, wraps up deal to buy 49% stake in Essar OilStreet Lighting Scheme illuminates 50,000 km of roadsI-T - Whether if a conditional grant comes from abroad, a foreign country is to be construed as a person or authority as per Explanation 10 to Section 43(1) - NO: ITAT
 
CX – As there is no proceeding u/s 11A(1) against appellant, benefit of proviso to 11A(2) is not available to co-noticee – Penalty u/r 26 upheld: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JULY 17, 2017: IN a CE case booked against M/s. Air Carrying Corporation (I) Pvt. Ltd. , the appellant was a co-noticee against whom penal provisions were invoked.

The demand of duty was confirmed and penalty was imposed against the main noticee. Penalty was also imposed on appellantu/r 26 of the CER.

Aggrieved,the appellant isbefore the Tribunal.

It is submitted that the main noticee, M/s. Air Carrying Corporation (I) Pvt. Ltd. had paid the entire duty along with interest and 25% of penalty within 30 days of the order and consequently, in terms of Section 11A(1A) of the CEA, 1944, the proceedings against the co-noticeeget abated.

And, therefore, the penalty imposed should be dropped as rule 26 of CER should be r/w Section 11A of the CEA, 1944.

The AR supported the order.

The Single Member Bench extracted the provisions of Section 11A(1A), (2) of the CEA, 1944 and observed -

4.1 It is seen that the proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 11A provides that if the main noticee has paid the duty in full together with interest and penalty under sub-section (1A), the proceedings in respect of such persons and such other persons to whom notices are served under sub-section (1) shall, without prejudice to the provisions of Section 9, 9A and 9AA be deemed to be conclusive as to the matters stated herein.

Inasmuch as since in the instant case, there are no proceedings under sub-section (1) of Section 11A against the appellant, the benefit of proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 11A is not available to the appellant, the CESTAT held.

The appeal was dismissed.

Missed the bus -

++ By Notification No.  8/2016-CENT  dated 1.3.2016, the Central Excise Rules were amended to add a proviso after Rule 26(1):

Provided that where any proceeding for the person liable to pay duty have been concluded under clause (a) or clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 11AC of the Act in respect of duty, interest and penalty, all proceedings in respect of penalty against other persons, if any, in the said proceedings shall also be deemed to be concluded .

++ Also see CBEC Circular No. 11/2016-Customs., Dated: March 15, 2016

++ Can proceedings against co-noticees be deemed to be concluded if main assessee pays duty, interest and penalty [ DDT 2110 ]

In favour:

++ 2013-TIOL-1048-CESTAT-DEL 

++ 2016-TIOL-28-CESTAT-MUM , 2013-TIOL-768-CESTAT-MUM , 2016-TIOL-855-CESTAT-MUM [All Single Member Bench decisions]

Contra view –

++ 2013-TIOL-26-CESTAT-DEL [SMB]

++ 2015-TIOL-756-CESTAT-MUM [SMB]

(See 2017-TIOL-2453-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS