News Update

Gold watch of richest Titanic pax auctioned for USD 1.46 millionIraq is latest to criminalise same-sex marriage with max 15 yrs of jail-termUndersea quake of 6.5 magnitude strikes Java; No tsunami alert issuedZelensky says Russia shelling oil facilities to choke supply to Europe20 army men killed in blasts at army base in Cambodia3 Indian women from Gujarat died in mega SUV accident in USJNU switches to NET in place of entrance test for PhD admissionsGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand noticeI-T - Bonafide claim of deduction by assessee which was accepted in first round of proceedings does not tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars, simply because it was disallowed later: ITATIndia-bound oil tanker struck by Houthi’s missiles in Red SeaSCO Defence Ministers' Meeting endorses 'One Earth, One Family, One Future'RBI issues draft rules on digital lendingI-T - In order to invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263, twin conditions of error in order and also prejudice to interest of Revenue must be established independently: ITATCRPF senior official served notice of dismissal on charges of sexual harassmentIndian Air Force ushers in Digital Transformation with DigiLocker IntegrationColumbia faculty blames leadership for police action against protestersCX - When process undertaken by assessee does not amount to manufacture, even then CENVAT credit is admissible if such inputs are cleared on payment of duty which would amount to reversal of credit availed: CESTATGoogle to inject USD 3 bn investment in data centre in IndianaCus - The equipments are teaching accessories which enable students in a class to respond to queries and these equipments are used along with ADP machine, same merits classification under CTH 8471 60 29: CESTATUN says clearing Gaza mounds of rubble to take 14 yrsST - When issue is of interpretation, appellant should not be fastened with demand for extended period, the demand confirmed for extended period is set aside: CESTAT
 
TDS on purchase of immovable properties – A procedural nightmare?

FEBRUARY 28, 2013

By S Sivakumar, Advocate

THE Finance Bill, 2013 has proposed to introduce Section 194-IA, which reads as under:

42. After section 194-I of the Income-tax Act, the following section shall be inserted with effect from the 1st day of June, 2013, namely:-

‘194-IA. (1) Any person, being a transferee, responsible for paying (other than the person referred to in section 194LA) to a resident transferor any sum by way of consideration for transfer of any immovable property (other than agricultural land), shall, at the time of credit of such sum to the account of the transferor or at the time of payment of such sum in cash or by issue of a cheque or draft or by any other mode, whichever is earlier, deduct an amount equal to one per cent. of such sum as income-tax thereon.

(2) No deduction under sub-section (1) shall be made where the consideration for the transfer of an immovable property is less than fifty lakh rupees.

Explanation.-For the purposes of this section,-

(a) “agricultural land” means agricultural land in India, not being a land situate in any area referred to in items (a) and (b) of sub-clause (iii) of clause (14) of section 2;

(b) “immovable property” means any land (other than agricultural land) or any building or part of a building.'.

As we know, this proposal had been made in last year's Finance Bill… fortunately, this proposal was dropped when the Finance Act, 2012 was passed. Quite unfortunately, this provision has found its way back into the income tax statute.

This proposal is likely to create a lot of practical issues, some of which are discussed here..

As is known, Developers and Builders, in many parts of the country, enter into two agreements, viz. one, for the sale of the undivided portion of the undivided portion of the land and the other, for the activity of construction, which is a works contract, by the Developer/Builder. As is known, it is the sale of land that is recognized as a transfer of immovable property, requiring registration under the Stamp Acts of the States. It is not clear as to whether, TDS is to be effected on the sale value of land, as recognized under the local Stamp Act, or whether, TDS is to be effected on the total value of the money paid by the buyer of the immovable property to the seller. My personal view is that, TDS would be applicable on the entire quantum of money paid /payable by the buyer of the immovable property.

There is another major procedural issue that could surface here, given the fact that, buyers of immovable property and especially, flats, pay the selling party, viz. the Developer/Builders in installments spread over an extended period. In many typical cases, the whole activity of constructing and delivering flats could run for a few years. It would seem that, the purchaser of the flats would be required to effect TDS, every time he makes a payment to the Developer/Builder, in the cases covered by this Section…. this could be a huge procedural nightmare.

It is also not clear as to how this Section, as and when enacted, would apply in respect of transactions in respect of which, part of the purchase consideration would have been paid prior to this Section, coming into effect.

Moreover, this proposed Section, attracts TDS at the time of the credit of the amount payable to the transferor/seller or at the time of the actual payment, whichever is earlier. The requirement to effect TDS at the time the buyer/transferee credits the amount/s to the transferor/seller's account, could create a lot of practical issues, considering the fact that, most of the buyers of the immovable properties are individuals.

The Realty Sector was quite relieved to see this proposal getting dropped, at the time of the passage of the Finance Bill, 2012. This proposal, which has made a successful comeback, comes as an unpleasant development for the Realty Sector.

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site. )


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Sale of Under construction flats, whether immovable property

Article has touched upon very important issue that has potential for great trouble for flat buyers and builders.

Here I feel that since sale of under consturction flats, are taxed as Works Contracts under VAT and Service Tax, on the basis that property in goods is transferred as goods while contract is being executed, no scope is left for same sale of goods to be taxed again as sale of immovable property from builder to flat purchaser.

This is because property in building materials is transferred before said goods become immovable as part of the building. Service portion of such works contract also can by no stretch of imagination be conceived to be sale of immovable property.

This leaves only value of land contained in the price of flat, to be liable for being treated as sale of immovable property and new TDS shall be payable only to the extent of land price part of the total flat price.

CA M B Abhyankar, Pune

Posted by Mukund Abhyankar
 
Sub: 1 PERCENT TDS ON IMMMOVABLE PROERTY

THE Finance Bill, 2013 has proposed to introduce Section 194-IA, which reads as under:
42. After section 194-I of the Income-tax Act, the following section shall be inserted with effect from the 1st day of June, 2013, namely:-
‘194-IA. (1) Any person, being a transferee, responsible for paying (other than the person referred to in section 194LA) to a resident transferor any sum by way of consideration for transfer of any immovable property (other than agricultural land), shall, at the time of credit of such sum to the account of the transferor or at the time of payment of such sum in cash or by issue of a cheque or draft or by any other mode, whichever is earlier, deduct an amount equal to one per cent. of such sum as income-tax thereon.
(2) No deduction under sub-section (1) shall be made where the consideration for the transfer of an immovable property is less than fifty lakh rupees.
Explanation.-For the purposes of this section,-
(a) “agricultural land” means agricultural land in India, not being a land situate in any area referred to in items (a) and (b) of sub-clause (iii) of clause (14) of section 2;
(b) “immovable property” means any land (other than agricultural land) or any building or part of a building.'.
The purpose of brining this provision is I think not meaningful at times when Realty Sector requires a boost. Practical difficulties will makes this provision effect less. The first difficulty is the valuation of property. The sale and buy of property is cash and through cheque. Many transferors try to evade the TDS by negotiating with buyer for consideration of property in white for less than Rs. 50 lacs and rest in cash. Suppose, that the buyer is deducting 1% TDS on property value more than Rs. 50 lacs which is paid in white. The transferee (buyer) shall have to deposit the TDS amount to the exchequer and if the buyer cannot deposit to CG account on due date what is the recourse available to buyer. How Govt can keep the check on this transactions. What proof the transferor shall have that 1% TDS is deducted on the consideration of selling property. Further , the question arises when there is no control of the Govt on the transaction the TDS deduction 1% will not make any sense for second sale and purchase of property. The Govt should ideally frame rules for Section 194-IA to make this section meaningful, non tax evasive and compulsion. Ideally at time of registration in the state for property transactions, the registrar should issue the certificate after ensuring that TDS is deducted by the buyer and a certificate be issued to the transferor of the property. There are many lacunae in this provision which needs to be addressed and covered in subsequent notifications and circular. Let’s not taxing so much so that investor forced to evade tax.
NIMISH CHITALIA


Posted by relianceada relianceada
 
Sub: TDS on purchase of immovable property

A better alternative would have been to make the Registrar of immovable property responsible for deducting the tax at source at the time of registration, depositing it in Government account, issuing TDS certificate to the Seller and filing of the TDS return. The Registrars already have a TAN number for filing the Annual Information Returns.
It will be nearly impossible for the Purchaser to make such compliances.

Posted by S M Khan
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.