![]() |
|
By TIOL News Service CHENNAI, JULY 01, 2009: THE issue has a very interesting back-drop. The assessee is a paint manufacturer and has been clearing Base Paint by paying Central Excise duty on the basis of MRP. The base paint is mixed with the colourants at the dealers' premises as per the choice of the customers. As per the revenue, the Base Paint is not covered under the Packaged Commodity Rules, 1977 and has to be assessed under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The stay applications against the demand came up before the West Zonal Bench and the appellants were directed to pre-deposit Rs 2.5 crores as no prima facie case was made out against the demand. (2008-TIOL-269-CESTAT-MUM) . After nearly three months, the issue came up before the South Zonal Bench in respect of the same assessee. This time, complete waiver was granted as prima facie case was made to assess the goods under Section 4A. (2008-TIOL-913-CESTAT-MAD) While granting stay, the SZB observed that the permission granted by the Central Government to clear base paint in non-standard quantities and the subsequent amendment to the Third Schedule to the PC Rules were not brought to the notice of the Bench. After obtaining stay at SZB, the appellant filed application for modification of Stay before the WZB for waiving the pre-deposit of Rs 2.5 crores. However the WZB refused to modify the earlier order. (2008-TIOL-1034-CESTAT-MUM) And the SZB has passed the final order on the issue setting aside the demand of duty under Section 4. The appellant argued that base paint being paint necessarily requires pre-packing. All paints are subject to the provisions of SW&M Act and PC Rules made thereunder with stipulation for standard packing. The permission of Government given under order dated 24.07.2004 and amendment to Schedule III to Rule 5 of the PC Rules to include base paint with specified sizes of package proved that the base paints have been pre-packed commodity all along under the PC Rules, even before the paints were notified by the Government for valuation under Section 4A of the Act. When base paints are covered under PC Rules and paints are a notified commodity under Section 4A, the impugned order valuing the product under Section 4 is incorrect. The base paint is opened only after the consumer decides to purchase it. The consumer decides the exact shade and the quantity. In order to get the shade he has to purchase the base paint of required quantity and the necessary quantity of colourant. On purchase, at the behest of the consumer, the dealer opens the tin of the base paint, places it on the stirrer for adding drops of colorant and stirring. After the mixing, the tin is closed and the paint is delivered in the same tin. Thus the purchase of base paint in the packed condition is in-built in the process of purchase by the consumer. This established process of purchase is recognized in the PC Rules and the base paint is hence expressly covered in those provisions. The CESTAT held:
|
|||||||||||