News Update

IT Sector urges FM to lower GST on telecom services to 12%NIC CERT launched to predict cyber attacksConnectivity with ASEAN is India's priority: GovtTreading GST Path - XXXIX - Tribunal at crossroadsST - Denial of CENVAT credit on ground of failure to deposit tax by service provider is not correct in equity when there is no express condition to that effect in CCR, 2004: CESTATI-T - Reopening of concluded assessment by invoking provision of section 147 will not fall under ambit of change of opinion where AO formed an opinion contrary to binding decision of Apex Court: ITATCus - A court is expected to make an overall assessment of fact situation and test same on touchstone of law to reach to its conclusion: CESTATVice President calls for ranking of legislatures & notifying disruptors on daily basisOnline exam portal of IAF launchedPre-Budget Meet - Economists ask FM to lower MAT & spell out roadmap for tax reformsNadda launches Operational Guidelines for HDUs & ICUsRahul Gandhi formally elected unopposed Congress President; PM congratulates him on his elevationCBDT Task Force for reviewing Income Tax Law to hold its first meeting on Dec 14, 2017NCLT Favoring takeover of Unitech Management- Apex court to hear case tomorrowRyan Row- SC Declines to repose trust in trustees in bail applicationReal Estate- ITC a double edged sword under GSTI-T - Assessees cannot avail Post decisional hearing if their case is transferred u/s 127 to some other I-T Officer located in same city: HCST - Service of taking repossession of vehicle from borrower is a part of 'security' service which is specifically included in definition of input service: CESTATCX - Tribunal, not being court of equity, it is difficult to entertain prayer of appellant for grant of interest from date of deposit made in accordance with HC order: CESTATWTO Meet in Buenos Aires - India hopeful of support on food security issueOver 15 mn girls aged between 15 to 19 experienced forced sex: UNICEF

MESSAGE BOARD

   

How safe are public deposits with press baron Ramoji Rao, HUF? Will MoF or RBI answer this question, please?


Mr K L Narasimhan vs Mr Ramoji Rao

I have no expertise to comment on the subject. neither i am a part of that 2200 crore investor base. notwithstanding the author's great concern for the public, certain observations of the author appears to subtly manifest a war between the author and mr.ramoji rao. i am also not able to discount the faith of so much of investors who have invested such a mammoth 2200 crores in his HUF.Years back, we all witnessed a great scam on the investment companies and millions were defrauded. after that most of us have become sane enough to plan our investment resources. even after that if mr. ramoji rao could garner and keep such a bounty means it is a testimony, at least to me, of sheer public confidence in him.

true, it is our responsibility to bring out facts to the public but,in no way, it shall create an unnecessary turbulence and cause irrepairable damage to the public faith or confidence.

i also request TIOL to send this piece to the house of ramoji rao and ask for thier comments and clarifications, if any.

jk

jaikumar seetharaman 13/11/2006

 
Re :Mr K L Narasimhan vs Mr Ramoji Rao

And Mr. Jai kumar, you have made a valid observation again. It is very easy for panic to set into the investor base. The damage could easily be caused but the repair work would take ages and probably many a lives. About the legality of such issues, less said the better, less bothered the best.

Venu nair 13/11/2006

 

Back
Shemaleup.net x-comics.org vr-porn360.net