News Update

Navigating GST Challenges on Expired MedicinesFormer Dy CM of Bihar Sushil Modi is no moreI-T- Assessee cannot be worsened of in appeal filed by him when relief already granted could be withdrawn: ITATGurugram-based IT professional run over by neighbour over parking disputeEPFO introduces Auto claim settlement for Education, marriage & housingOpenAI releases more advanced GPT-4o for freeI-T- Statement taken from deponent pursuant to Search & Seizure operations, cannot be deemed to be legally enforceable, where it does not contain signature of persons named therein : ITAT5 Iraqi soldiers die in terror attackIndia Port Global Ltd signs contract with Ports and Maritime Organization of IranUS to buy back land adjoining missile silos from China-linked firmsI-T - Assessee is entitled to deduction u/s 57(iii) of any other expenditure which is not in nature of capital expenditure which is laid out or expended wholly & exclusively for purpose of earning such income: ITATUS bans import of Russian uraniumSecretary Ex-servicemen Welfare visits border areas of SikkimMelinda Gates quits Gates Foundation; walks away with USD 12.5 bn for her charity activitiesCus - Rejection of refund application post finalisation of provisional Bills of Entry, on grounds of limitation, is unsustainable, where Revenue is unable to establish the dates on which O-i-O was conveyed to Assessee & that Assessee's refund application was barred by limitation: CESTATIndia inks deal with Iran to operate Chabahar portOptimise GST Administration Through Call Book SystemNepal Dy PM Upendra Yadav quits; his party exits coalition govtST - Appellant's claim of payment of Service Tax has not been taken into account while reconciling net Service Tax payable by them, Accordingly, matter remanded to verify the claim of appellant and arrive at actual Service Tax payable by appellant, if any: CESTAT

MESSAGE BOARD

   

CX - Notif. 21/2014-CX(NT) prohibiting manufacturer from taking CENVAT credit after six months from date of issue of invoice does not apply to invoices issued prior to date of notification: CESTAT


Time limit to take cenvat credit

the subject time restriction to take credit is imposed w.e.f 1.9.2014 vide Notfn No. 21/2014-NT dated 11.07.2017 which is prospective in nature as it is applicable in respect of credits taken on or after 1.9.2014. Judgement says that time restriction is applicable only for the invoices issued on or after 11.7.2014 and credit can be taken on the invoices issued prior to 11.7.2014 can be taken without any time limit may not be the intention of the provision. In fact it appears that time gap given from the date of notification (11.7.2014) to effective date (1.9.2014) is to provide opportunity to the trade to avail credit on any missed invoices. Further, not having such condition at the time of issue of invoices is no way deprive of any action on the part of the credit taker. Another reason given for allowing credit is that it is suffice if the credit is taken in the books of records even though the same is not reflected in the Cenvat Credit Register. Unless it is shown in the Cenvat Credit Register and also declared in the periodical returns how it was considered as shown in the books of records. If such an analogy is drawn how to recon the relevant date to issue SCN based on the date of receipt of input/input service shown in any book of record or on the date of taking credit in Cenvat Credit Register/ month of credit shown in the periodical returns.

mallikarjun reddy c 27/03/2018

 

Back

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.