News Update

Call drops - Problem is mostly indoors, says DoTACES fails again; CBEC feels compelled to extend ST Return filing date to April 30PM reviews performance of key infrastructure sectorsCX/CUS/ST - To prefer an appeal before Tribunal, appellant needs to deposit 10% of amount of duty/penalty irrespective of amounts equivalent to 7.5% deposited by them before Commr.(A): LBFM clarifies Union Govt has no plan to levy income tax on agri incomeST - If contention of department is accepted that appellant cannot be treated as service provider then payment made should not be treated as that of service tax but as reversal of CENVAT credit availed - Appeals allowed: CESTATSwachh Bharat Bug Finally Catches Up With CBDTCBDT clarifies rent from letting out of space with amenities in SEZ to be treated as business incomeGujarat goes for massive bureaucratic reshuffle - 45 IAS officers transferredHigh Seas Sales in GST RegimeExpenditure tax - Composite charges collected by hotel can be quantified only upon conclusion of stay of guests: HCCus Appellants were bonafide transferee of DEPB scrip with no involvement in the forgery or fraud before DGFT no penalty imposable ROM allowed: CESTATST Maintenance of software cannot be taxed under 'Management, maintenance or repair service' prior to 01.06.2007: CESTATPension Regulator makes it online for retirement advisersCBI nabs several Plant Quarantine officials + CHAs & Shipping Agents in corruption casee-PRAN card launched for Atal Pension YojanaSitharaman to inaugurate Spices Farmers Producer CompaniesCyber Crime - INTERPOL detects 9000 C2 servers; websites infected with malware codeRental income from space equipped with ameniteis in SEZ to be treated as business incomeCBDT prescribes method for valuation of FMV of assets owned by Trusts / InstitutionsGovt eases PF rules to allow withdrawal for house purchaseIf Govt grants waiver of loan to farmers, it may cost 2% of GDP: Arvind SubramanianCX - Exemption - Sec 11C Notification - Court cannot direct Government to grant exemption - No violation of Article 14: SCGST Network to provide standard software for small tradersClearance of Gift and Personal Use parcels imported through Courier modeST - Tribunal ordering appellant to pay further sum is bereft of any rationale as substantial part of demand stood deposited: HCI-T - Special limitation imposed on EOU for claiming deductions, by way of insertion of Sec 80A(5) and Fourth proviso to Sec 10B(1), is not violative of Constitution of India: HCCX - Activity of assembling various computer components into working system not manufacture: CESTATMinto Road Govt Press to be 'reborn' at cost of Rs 339 Crore
Untitled Document

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS
NEW DELHI

CIRCULAR NO

15/2017-Customs, Dated: April 19, 2017

To

All Principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners of Customs/ Customs (Preventive)
All Principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners of Customs & Central Excise
All Principal Commissioners/Commissioners of Customs/Customs (Preventive)
All Principal Commissioners/Commissioners of Customs & Central Excise

Subject: Rescinding Board Circular F. No. 528/213/87-Customs (TU) - reg.

Attention is invited to Board Circular F. No. 528/213/87-Cus. (T.U.) ICD dated 08.08.1987. In the said circular, Board had stipulated that once a contract is registered either for initial setting up or for substantial expansion of an existing plant etc, the imports made become classifiable under the heading 9801 of the customs tariff liable to duty at the project rate. Such goods forming part of the contract and assessed under CTH 9801 lose their identity and cannot be classifiable on merits under any other heading of the Customs Tariff. Hence any differential rate of duty prescribed by exemption notification on individual goods (other those for goods specifically covered under CTH 9801) will not come into play for the assessment of project goods. However, Supreme Court has not accepted this view and has allowed benefit of individual notifications even for imports assessed under CTH 9801.

In view of the above position, Board has decided to rescind the said circular. Therefore, Circular F. No. 528/213/87-Cus. (T.U.) ICD dated 08.08.1987 is rescinded.

F.No.450/10/2017-Cus-IV

(Zubair Riaz)
Director (Customs)