News Update

DRI nabs Dubai-bound pax with FC worth Rs 1.93 croresCX - Too late for Revenue to complain that there is non-compliance by Settlement Commission with mandatory provisions of law: High CourtI-T - Tax Recovery Officer cannot summarily assume powers under Indian Contract Act, 1872, to suo motu declare a transaction of sale to be void & without approaching civil court: HCI-T - Expenses incurred for purely business purposes not being incurred on employees, would not attract Fringe Benefit Tax: HCCX - General practice amongst masses to not consider trading as an 'exempted service' till amendment was made in CCR - assessee had no malafide intention to avail undue benefit: CESTATCJI impeachment - Opposition Parties finally do it; hands over Notice to Vice PresidentBRICS discusses constitution of Working Group on illicit financial flowsCBDT shifts DGHRD office to Jawaharlal Nehru StadiumCBIC clarifies that remnant fuels (HSD/LDO) (after ship breaking) are classifiable under Chapter 27 and free from import policy restrictionsI-T - Mere projection of profit statement found in loose sheets from taxpayer's premises, is no basis for levying penalty in his hands: ITATGoM on Transport recommends uniform road tax structureCX - Assessee taking credit on rejected goods, recyling same and paying duty on clearance alleging that credit has been availed irregularly is unsubstantiated no question of double duty : CESTATGovt seeks feedback to Draft Coastal Regulation ZoneI-T - Payments made to founder or relative of trust, if credited to trust's account immediately without taking any undue benefit from it, will not upset exemption benefit u/s 11: ITATFC to individually assess needs of each State: NK SinghCX Mere reiteration of order of penalty imposed by original authority, who had jurisdiction, by first appellate authority, who lacked jurisdiction, does not cause grievance to appellant at that stage: CESTATGoM on Transport recommends uniform road tax and national permits for buses and taxisJustice Loya death case - SC dismisses pleasChennai Customs nabs pax coming from Dubai with gold worth Rs 2.5 Cr + also seizes 7.5 kg of seahorses during vehicle checkGovt to give new award to certain ranks of Civil servantsVAT - Reimbursement received by dealer for supply of spare parts to its customers under warranty period, are not liable to VAT under Maharashtra VAT Act: HCIT - Where Revenue detects massive tax evasion through bogus bills, it cannot wash hands of it through mere additions: ITATIT - Failure to explain scientific method in determining the amount of performance bonus payable to employees can lead to its disallowance : ITATST - Demand of differential amount of service tax alleging that entire amount collected by PCO operator is subject to levy of service tax cannot sustain for period prior to 01.03.2011: CESTATIndia almost ready with Rs 600 Crore Chandrayaan-2Govt launches Study in India Portal for foreign studentsAfter issuance of SCN, write to noticees about availing window of Settlement Commission for early settlement of disputes - CBIC instructs fieldCBDT Diktat on Misconduct - But, Mr Prime Minister, Actual High-handedness lies in Revenue Target Fixation!
Untitled Document



09/2018-Customs, Dated: April 19, 2018


All Principal Chief Commissioners /Chief Commissioners of Customs/Customs (Preventive)
All Principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners of Customs and GST
All Principal Commissioners /Commissioners of Customs/Customs (Preventive)

Subject: Classification of remnant fuel & oils -reg.

Kind attention is invited to the Board circular No. 37/96-customs dated 3.7.1996 on the above subject. In the said circular, Board had inter-alia clarified that in the case of a vessel brought for ship breaking, the remnant fuel and oil (other than fuel and oil contained in the vessels machinery and engines), ships stores etc. are classifiable separately in their appropriate headings and not in CTH 8908.

2. References have been received in the Board from field formations that Bills of entries related to ship breaking are being provisionally assessed in view of the dismissal of the departmental Civil Appeal against the CESTAT order dated 08.07.14 by Supreme Court in D.No.41289 of 2014 dated 31.07.2015. in the said order, CESTAT held that classification of the ships/vessels brought in for breaking up along with surplus fuel, will have to be considered classifiable under CTH 89.08 of the import policy as an integral part of the vessel/ships and as the imports under CTH 89.08 are free without any restriction, therefore, such MGO/HSD contained in vessels brought in for breaking up, cannot be held as liable for confiscation and no penalties imposable under section 112 (a) of the Customs Act, 1962. As mentioned above, Hon'ble SC vide order dated 31.07.2015 upheld the order of the CESTAT.

3. Field formations have stated that in view of the dismissal of the departmental appeal, clarification is required on the classification of remnant fuel and oil other than that contained in vessel's machinery etc. Industry Associations have also requested to revisit the said circular and to classify remaining fuel and oil alongwith other items like stores and Spares etc. as integral part of the vessel under 8908 in view of Hon'ble SC order dated 31.07.2015.

4. The matter has been examined in detail. This issue was also deliberated at length in the Annual Tariff Conference of Chief Commissioners/ Directors Generals held in Delhi on 4/5th March 2018.

5. The background of the case is that CESTAT decided a bunch of appeals wherein the appellants were challenging levy of redemption fine on remnant fuel and imposition of penalty on the importers who had filed bills of entry for ship breaking. The importers had classified the remnant fuel under tariff heading of chapter 27 in accordance with the Board Circular 37/96-Cus dated 03.07.96 and paid the duties accordingly. However, adjudicating authority/ appellate authority took a view that since items under Chapter 27 were canalized, therefore, the said goods (remnant fuels) were duly confiscated, redemption fine levied and penalties imposed. The matter was challenged before CESTAT which agreed with the view of DGFT that so far as classification of the ships/ vessels brought in for breaking up along with remnant fuel, will have to be considered classifiable under heading 89.08 of the import policy as an integral part of the vessel/ ship. Department's appeal against the said CESTAT order was dismissed by the Supreme Court. The issue has attained finality as the SC's order accepted by the Department.

6. However, in a subsequent change of stand, DGFT changed its stand vide notification No.07/2015-2020 dated 20th May, 2015 and reverted to the earlier view that remnantfuels (HSD/LDO) would be classified under Chapter 27. It also freed these items from policy restrictions when imported, brought on board in old ships / vessels meant for breaking (copy attached).

7. In view of the above, import of remnant fuels referred to in para 2(d) of Board circular 37/96-customs would not be subject to any policy condition under chapter 27 prior to 20th May 2015. As on 20th May 2015, DGFT has made special dispensation with regard to remnant fuels classifiable under heading 2710 and freed them from policy restriction vide notification No. 07/2015-2020.

8. Pending provisional assessments may be finalized accordingly.

9. Difficulties in this regard, if any, may be brought to the knowledge of Board.

F. No, 528/74/2012-STO (TU)

OSD (Tariff Unit)




07/2015-2020, Dated: May 20, 2015

Subject: Amendment in import policy of fuels, incidental to the import of ship for ship breaking, under Chapter 27 of ITC (HS), 2012 - Schedule - 1 (Import Policy).

In exercise of powers conferred by Section 3 of FT (D&R) Act, 1992, read with paragraph 1.02 and 2.01 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-2020, the Central Government hereby amends the Import Policy of fuels, incidental to the import of ship for ship breaking, under ITC (HS) code 2710 1930 and 2710 1940 of Chapter 27 of ITC (HS), 2012 - Schedule - 1 (Import Policy) as under:

ITC (HS) Code
Existing Policy
Existing Policy Condition
Revised Policy Condition
2710 1930 High speed diesel (HSD) State Trading Enterprise Import as per Policy Condition (5) below. Import as per Policy Condition (5) below. However, import of HSD, brought on board in old ships / vessels which are meant for breaking, whether within vessel's machinery/engine or outside (as remnant fuel) and is incidental to such ships / vessels, is "free".
2710 1940 Light diesel oil (LDO) State Trading Enterprise Import allowed through IOC subject to para 2.11 of Foreign Trade Policy. Import allowed through IOC subject to para 2.20 of Foreign Trade Policy (2015-20). However, import of LDO, brought on board in old ships / vessels which are meant for breaking, whether within vessel's machinery/engine or outside (as remnant fuel) and is incidental to such ships / vessels, is "free" .

2. Effect of this Notification: Import of High Speed Diesel (HSD) and Light diesel oil (LDO), brought on board in the old ships / vessels for purpose of breaking, and which are incidental to such ships / vessels, is "free" .

[Issued from File No.IPC/4/5/ (684)/97-02/PC-2 (A)]

(Pravir Kumar)
Director General of Foreign Trade