News Update

Apple China tosses out WhatsApp & Threads from App store after being orderedChina announces launch of new military cyber corpsRailways operates record number of additional Trains in Summer Season 2024GST - Assessing officer took into account the evidence placed on record and drew conclusions - Bench is, therefore, of the view that petitioner should present a statutory appeal: HC1st phase polling - Close to 60% voter turnout recordedGST - Tax liability was imposed because petitioner replied without annexing documents - It is just and appropriate that an opportunity be provided to contest tax demand on merits, albeit by putting petitioner on terms: HCMinistry of Law to organise Conference on Criminal Justice System tomorrowGST - To effectively contest the demand and provide an opportunity to petitioner to place all relevant documents, matter remanded but by protecting revenue interest: HCGovt appoints New Directors for 6 IITsGST - Petitioner has failed to avail opportunities granted repeatedly - Court cannot entertain request for remand as there has been no procedural impropriety and infraction of any provision by assessing authority: HCNexus between Election Manifesto and Budget 2024 in July!GST - Classification - Matter which had stood examined by Principal Commissioner is being treated differently by Additional Commissioner - Prima facie , approach appears to be perverse: HCI-T- Denial of deduction u/s 80IC can create perception of genuine hardship, where claimant paid tax in excess of what was due; order denying deduction merits re-consideration: HCIsrael launches missile attack on IranEC holds Video-Conference with over 250 Observers of Phase 2 pollsGermany disfavours Brazil’s proposal to tax super-richI-T- If material found during search are not incriminating in nature AO can not made any addition u/s 153A in respect of unabated assessment: ITATGovt appoints Dinesh Tripathi as New Navy ChiefAFMS, IIT Kanpur to develop tech to address health problems of soldiersFBI sirens against Chinese hackers eyeing US infrastructureKenya’s top military commanders perish in copter crashCBIC notifies Customs exchange rates w.e.f. April 19, 2024Meta shares ‘Most Intelligent’ AI assistant built on Llama modelDengue cases soaring in US - Close to ‘Emergency situation’: UN Agency
Untitled Document

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
NEW DELHI

NOTIFICATION

Dated: May 29, 2017

S.O. 1702(E).–Whereas, the Finance Act, 2017 (7 of 2017) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) received the assent of the President on 31st March, 2017;

And whereas, second proviso to sub-section (1) of section 184 of the said Act provides that the age of the Chairperson, Chairman or President shall not exceed seventy years and the age of the Vice-Chairperson, Vice-Chairman, Vice-President, Presiding Officer or any other Member shall not exceed sixty- seven years;

And whereas, such provision of the said Act had come into force on the 26th day of May, 2017;

And whereas, no person is qualified to be appointed as the Presiding Officer-

(a) of the Securities Appellate Tribunal established under the Securities Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992), unless he is, or has been, a judge of Supreme Court or Chief Justice of High Court or a Judge of High Court for at least seven years;

(b) of the Industrial Tribunal constituted by the Central Government under the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) unless he is, has been, or is qualified to be, a Judge of High Court; and

(c) of the Debts Recovery Tribunal established under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (51 of 1993) unless he is a Judge of District Court;

And whereas, a difficulty has arisen in giving effect to the aforesaid provisions of the said Act as a Judge of the Supreme Court or the Chief Justice of a High Court or a Judge of a High Court, after appointment as the Presiding Officer of Securities Appellate Tribunal may not be retired at the age of Sixty-five and his age of retirement be increase to the Seventy years as in case of the Chairperson or Chairman or President of Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, or as the case may be, Authority;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 189 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby makes the following Order, namely: -

1. Short title and commencement. - (1) This Order may be called the Finance (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2017.

(2) It shall come into force on the date of its publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Finance Act, 2017 (7 of 2017), in section 184, in sub-section (1), in the second proviso, -

(i) in clause (a), for the words “or President”, the words “President or the Presiding Officer of the Securities Appellate Tribunal” shall be substituted;

(ii) in clause (b), after the words “Presiding Officer”, the words “of the Industrial Tribunal constituted by the Central Government and the Debts Recovery Tribunal” shall be inserted.

[F. No. A.50050/9/2016-Ad1C (CESTAT) Pt. I]

Udai Singh Kumawat,
Jt. Secy.

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.




Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.