News Update

I-T - Failure to explain scientific method in determining the amount of performance bonus payable to employees can lead to its disallowance : ITATST - Demand of differential amount of service tax alleging that entire amount collected by PCO operator is subject to levy of service tax cannot sustain for period prior to 01.03.2011: CESTATIndia almost ready with Rs 600 Crore Chandrayaan-2Govt launches Study in India Portal for foreign studentsAfter issuance of SCN, write to noticees about availing window of Settlement Commission for early settlement of disputes - CBIC instructs fieldCBDT Diktat on Misconduct - But, Mr Prime Minister, Actual High-handedness lies in Revenue Target Fixation!Government imposes definitive anti-dumping duty on Glassware imported from PR China and IndonesiaPunjab Govt invites nomination for post of Special Secretary, GSTInsolvency and Bankruptcy Code - On failure to deposit installments as directed in court order, by JAL Court can attach personal properties of its directors - SC (See 'Legal Desk' in 'CorpLaws.com')Competition Act - Company is duty bound to notify bulk deal of acquisition of shares to commission in accordance to section 6(2) of the Act when Press Release indicates that acquisition is not merely an investment but is part of long term deal - SC (See 'Legal Desk' in 'Corplaws.com')Competition Act - Penalty for not furnishing information u/s 43A is imposable where information is not disclosed with mala fide intention: SC (See 'Legal Desk' in 'Corplaws.com')I-T - Non-obstante provisions of Ss 153A & 153C do not override mandatory provisions of Sections 142(2) & (143(2): HCI-T - Profit yielded by power companies should not be refused for deductions u/s 80IB, just because power generated by company is captively consumed: ITATI-T - Appeal filed before Aaykar Seva Kendra and later transferred to CIT(A) would not be barred by limitation: HCST - Appellant is entitled to CENVAT credit on input services used for construction of immovable property which is ultimately rented out: CESTATCX - Disallowance of CENVAT credit availed on services in proportion to value of clearance of inputs as such does not have backing of law : CESTATCBDT warns of action as plaints of misconduct pour inGovt plans to accelerate growth of districts by 3 per centPM addresses Indian Community in StockholmLaw Commission favours application of RTI Act provisions to BCCIRefund of GST on account of inverted duty structure - formula in rule 89 of CGST Rules corrected to also incorporate reference to turnover and tax payable on account of servicesCGST Rule 89 amended, rule 97 substituted1.3 crore e-Way Bills generated till yesterday; Six more States going for intra-state optionNorth Block says printing of Rs 500 currency notes to be enhanced by five timesIllegal constructions in Kasauli come under SC radar; Demolition orderedST - Standard Chartered Bank undertook collection of export proceeds through their office in UK who retained a part of amount towards collection charges No ST liability on appellant under reverse charge: CESTATApplicability of GST on high sea saleElectoral bonds have built-in security features: GovtAdvance Ruling - The New Goose ( See 'JEST GST on GST Home Page')
Untitled Document

THE CONSTITUTION (TWENTY-NINTH AMENDMENT) ACT, 1972

Statement of Objects and Reasons appended to the Constitution (Thirty-second Amendment) Bill, 1972 which was enacted as the Constitution (Twenty-ninth Amendment) Act, 1972

STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND REASONS

The Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (Act 1 of 1964), in the principal land reform law in the State of Kerala and was included in the Ninth Schedule to the Constitution. In the course of implementation, the State Government faced serious practical difficulties and to overcome them, that Act was extensively amended by the Kerala Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1969 (Act 35 of 1969) and by the Kerala and Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1971 (Act 25 of 1971). Certain crucial provisions of the principal Act as amended were challenged in the High Court of Kerala and in the Supreme Court, creating a climate of uncertainty in the effective implementation of land reforms. Although the High Court of Kerala has generally upheld the scheme of land reforms envisaged in the principal Act as amended, a few vital provisions have been struck down by the High Court. Even in regard to the provisions upheld by the High Court, the affected parties had moved the Supreme Court in appeal. Some persons also moved the Supreme Court in original petitions challenging certain provisions of the Act. The Supreme Court in its judgments delivered on 26th and 28th April, 1972, have generally uphold the scheme of land reforms as envisaged in the principal Act as amended but agreed with the High Court invalidating certain crucial provisions. It is feared that this will have far-reaching adverse affects on the implementation of the programme of land reforms in the State and thousands of tenants will be adversely affected by some of the provisions which have been either struck down or rendered ineffective. It is also apprehended that certain observations of the Supreme Court in the judgments might open the flood-gates of litigation much to the detriment of thousands of Kudikidappukars in the State who will not be able to defend themselves in protracted legal proceedings. Further, appeals have been preferred against the judgment of the Kerala High Court invalidating certain important provisions of the principal Act as amended [e.g. sections 4A (1)(a) and (b), 7, 7D(1) and 103] and they are pending in the Supreme Court.

2. It is, therefore, proposed to include the Kerala Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1969 and the Kerala Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1971 in the Ninth Schedule to the Constitution so that they may have the protection under article 31B and any uncertainty or doubt that may arise in regard to the validity of those Acts is removed. The Bill seeks to achieve this object.

(H R Gokhale)

Dated: May 24, 1972

THE CONSTITUTION (TWENTY-NINTH AMENDMENT) ACT, 1972

Dated: June 09, 1972

An Act further to amend the Constitution of India.

BE it enacted by Parliament in the Twenty-third Year of the Republic of India as follows:-

1. Short title:-

This Act may be called the Constitution (Twenty-ninth Amendment) Act, 1972.

2. Amendment of Ninth Schedule:-

In the Ninth Schedule to the Constitution, after entry 64 and before the Explanation the following entries shall be inserted, namely:-

"65. The Kerala Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1969 (Kerala Act 35 of 1969).

66. The Kerala Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1971 (Kerala Act 25 of 1971.".