News Update

GST - CBIC invites taxpayers to join fight against profiteeringNaidu dismisses impeachment notice against CJICX - Rebate which is sanctioned to appellant cannot be appropriated by invoking provisions of s.11, more specifically when dues are due from totally different entity: CESTATExport in new tax regime - Dichotomies & glitches in procedureOnce service tax has been discharged by M/s RMIL on fees collected from investors before remitting 95% amount to Appellant, demand of tax on this sum from Appellant would be double taxation: CESTATUniversalisation of the OECD transfer pricing guidelines (See 'TII Edit')CX - Employee is earning not for himself but also for family members - ST on insurance premium paid by company on group policy for employees as well as their family members is allowable as CENVAT credit: CESTATNDA Govt plays politically safe; shuns major fiscal reformsST - VCES, 2013 - Sec 110 is standalone section & makes no reference to Sec 107(4) of FA, 2013 - applicability of s. 110 is required to be examined independently: CESTATOrdinance promulgated to attach properties of Fugitive Economic OffendersTrade liberalisation increases GDP & private consumption: OECDI-T - Temporary suspension of business should not be construed as permanent closure, and hence will not debar owner from claiming routine commercial expenses: ITATGovt promulgates Ordinances to amend IPC to punish child rapist + take action against fugitive economic offenders15 Maoists killed in major operation by Maharashtra PolicePM to visit China for two-day summit starting on April 27When on date of DPC there was no criminal proceeding pending against officer, promotion cannot be denied merely on ground that CBI had recommended major penalty in a DA case: HCGST team of CGST & SGST officials bag PM's Award on Civil Services DayOnline Dispute Resolution mechanism launched
Untitled Document

THE CONSTITUTION (TWENTIETH AMENDMENT) ACT, 1966

Statement of Objects and Reasons appended to the Constitution (Twenty-third Amendment) Bill, 1966 which was enacted as the THE CONSTITUTION (Twentieth Amendment) Act, 1966

STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND REASONS

Appointment of district judges in Uttar Pradesh and a few other States have been rendered invalid and illegal by a recent judgment of the Supreme Court on the ground that such appointments were not made in accordance with the provisions of article 233 of the Constitution. In another judgment, the Supreme Court had held that the power of posting of a district judge under article 233 does not include the power of transfer of such judge from one station to another and that the power of transfer of a district judge is vested in the High Court under article 235 of the Constitution. As a result of these judgments, a serious situation has arisen because doubt has been thrown on the validity of the judgments, decrees, orders and sentences passed or made by these district judges and a number of writ petitions and other cases have already been filed challenging their validity. The functioning of the district courts in Uttar Pradesh has practically come to a standstill. It is, therefore, urgently necessary to validate the judgments, decrees, orders and sentences passed or made heretofore by all such district judges in those States and also to validate the appointment, posting, promotion and transfer of such district judges barring those few who were not eligible for appointment under article 233.

2. The Bill seeks to give effect to the above proposals.

(Y B Chavan)

Dated: November 20, 1966

THE CONSTITUTION (TWENTIETH AMENDMENT) ACT, 1966

Dated: December 22, 1966

An Act further to amend the Constitution of India.

BE it enacted by Parliament in the Seventeenth Year of the Republic of India as follows:-

1. Short title:- This Act may be called the Constitution (Twentieth Amendment) Act, 1966.

2. Insertion of new article 233A:- After article 233 of the Constitution, the following article shall be inserted, namely:-

"233A. Validation of appointments of and judments, etc., delivered by, certain district judes:-Notwithstanding any judgment, decree or order of any court,-

(a) (i) no appointment of any person already in the judicial service of a State or of any person who has been for not less than seven years an advocate or a pleader, to be a district judge in that State, and

(ii) no posting, promotion or transfer of any such person as a district judge, made at any time before the commencement of the Constitution (Twentieth Amendment) Act, 1966, otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of article 233 or article 235 shall be deemed to be illegal or void or ever to have become illegal or void by reason only of the fact that such appointment, posting, promotion or transfer was not made in accordance with the said provisions;

(b) no jurisdiction exercised, no judgment, decree, sentence or order passed or made, and no other act or proceeding done or taken, before the commencement of THE CONSTITUTION (Twentieth Amendment) Act, 1966 by, or before, any person appointed, posted, promoted or transferred as a district judge in any State otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of article 223 or article 235 shall be deemed to be illegal or invalid or ever to have become illegal or invalid by reason only of the fact that such appointment, posting promotion or transfer was not made in accordance with the said provisions.".