Taxindiaonline.com
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com TIOL Tube Taxindiainternational.com
 
LOGIN
Forgot Password |  Register  
Sunday , February 14, 2016 | Updated : Feb 14, 10:58 IST
Income Tax    Customs    Excise    Service Tax    FEMA    DGFT    SEZ    Misc    Pitara    Budget   
About Us Contact Us Advertise
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com
 
 
NEWS FLASH
 
Cus - Apprehension that subsequent proceedings may be initiated cannot be a ground for seeking condonation of delay - Application dismissed: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Whether service provider not availing CENVAT can file revise returns under rule 9 of CCR, 2004 - clarification needed (See 'BUDGET RUN-UP') Give power of ROM to lower authority & introduce VCES, 2016 (See 'BUDGET RUN-UP') Govt to introduce new IPR policy & Patent regime soon: PM Make in India Event - PM reiterates no retro tax to be resorted to; promises transparent, stable and predictable tax regime VAT - deferment scheme - repayment of exempted sum for unexpired period within 5 to 13 years from start of deferment - Not open to beneficiary to claim that 13 yrs to start from expiration of eligibility period as per old policy - YES: SC (See 'Breaking News') Govt clears Rs 28000 cr road projects Art is ageless, religionless and timeless: PM Make service tax laws more democratic (See 'BUDGET RUN-UP') Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Whether jurisdiction of Intellectual Appellate Board is conditional upon civil court's determination of prima facie tenability of invalidity plea - NO: HC (See 'Breaking News') MP gets first Food Park; to benefit 30,000 farmers (See 'Mixed Buzz') CX - When demand itself was set aside in 2012, Revenue appeal filed in 2007 for imposition of penalty does not survive - Appeal dismissed as infructuous: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') MPs praise Ministry & NIFT for sustaining world-class quality (See 'Mixed Buzz') Applications invited for post of Counsellor at PMI, WTO (See 'Deputation Post' in Pitara) Lucknow DRI seizes 297 kg of cannabis coming from Guwahati Govt grants Sec 11C benefits to Di-Calcium Phosphate (animal feed grade) for six years period (See NT 4 in 'What's New') Industrial production growth goes down by 1.3% in December, 2015 CBDT issues transfer order of five CCITs; Aditya Vikram is new DG(Inv), Delhi + P C Mody gets Mumbai Investigation + Akhilesh Ranjan is now CCIT(5) in Delhi with addl charge of Pr CCIT(IT&TP) (See 'Transfer' in 'Pitara') JNPT extends Direct Port Delivery facility to all ACP clients (See 'Mixed Buzz') Customs Exchange Rate for Japanese Yen amended (See 'Notification 24' in 'What's New') ACC appoints Malay Kumar Sinha, Special Director, IB, as Secretary (Security) in Cabinet Secretariat (See 'Mixed Buzz') Make in India Week - Maharashtra expects huge investment in manufacturing Hopeful of passing bills on realty regulator, GST in Budget session: Venkaiah Naidu Indian exporters got tariff relief worth USD 4.4 bn through GSP in 2014: US Ambassador (See 'Mixed Buzz') SC refuses to restrain states from banning mobile internet, saying that such steps are necessary to maintain law and order Thailand accepts protocol amending TRIPS Agreement (See 'Mixed Buzz') Service tax evasion case booked by DGCEI - Makemytrip deposits Rs 42 Crore (See 'Mixed Buzz') Cus - Refusal by Appellate Commissioner to grant refund on ground that department's appeals are pending before HC would tantamount to ensuring stay against CESTAT order & is patently illegal - HC (See 'Breaking News') Customs - Board revamps SVB + Revamped Special Valuation Branch guidelines.. Better late than never!!! (See 'DDT') ST - No liability arises on appellant prior to 16.06.2005 on repairs of transformers received from various SEBs as tender process through which appellant got contract is only a 'work order' and contract for repair: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') FTP - Procedure for export of sesame seeds to the European Union countries - Deferment of implementation (See 'DDT') VAT - Whether consequential order passed by Appellate Authority in Stay Petition is non-est in eye of law, when Appellate Authority holds that there is no jurisdiction to adjudicate issues raised? - Yes, rules HC (See 'Breaking News') Focus on CENVAT scheme and procedural simplification (See 'Budget Run-up') I-T - Whether assessee can be treated as assessee in default, for not deducting TDS on 'likely to be paid interest', which was ultimately reversed in books - NO: HC (See 'Breaking News') Are two registrations required under CE Law for a dealer? (See 'Budget Run-up') Cus - Apprehension that subsequent proceedings may be initiated cannot be a ground for seeking condonation of delay - Application dismissed: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Whether service provider not availing CENVAT can file revise returns under rule 9 of CCR, 2004 - clarification needed (See 'BUDGET RUN-UP') Give power of ROM to lower authority & introduce VCES, 2016 (See 'BUDGET RUN-UP') Govt to introduce new IPR policy & Patent regime soon: PM Make in India Event - PM reiterates no retro tax to be resorted to; promises transparent, stable and predictable tax regime VAT - deferment scheme - repayment of exempted sum for unexpired period within 5 to 13 years from start of deferment - Not open to beneficiary to claim that 13 yrs to start from expiration of eligibility period as per old policy - YES: SC (See 'Breaking News') Govt clears Rs 28000 cr road projects Art is ageless, religionless and timeless: PM Make service tax laws more democratic (See 'BUDGET RUN-UP') Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Whether jurisdiction of Intellectual Appellate Board is conditional upon civil court's determination of prima facie tenability of invalidity plea - NO: HC (See 'Breaking News') MP gets first Food Park; to benefit 30,000 farmers (See 'Mixed Buzz') CX - When demand itself was set aside in 2012, Revenue appeal filed in 2007 for imposition of penalty does not survive - Appeal dismissed as infructuous: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') MPs praise Ministry & NIFT for sustaining world-class quality (See 'Mixed Buzz') Applications invited for post of Counsellor at PMI, WTO (See 'Deputation Post' in Pitara) Lucknow DRI seizes 297 kg of cannabis coming from Guwahati Govt grants Sec 11C benefits to Di-Calcium Phosphate (animal feed grade) for six years period (See NT 4 in 'What's New') Industrial production growth goes down by 1.3% in December, 2015 CBDT issues transfer order of five CCITs; Aditya Vikram is new DG(Inv), Delhi + P C Mody gets Mumbai Investigation + Akhilesh Ranjan is now CCIT(5) in Delhi with addl charge of Pr CCIT(IT&TP) (See 'Transfer' in 'Pitara') JNPT extends Direct Port Delivery facility to all ACP clients (See 'Mixed Buzz') Customs Exchange Rate for Japanese Yen amended (See 'Notification 24' in 'What's New') ACC appoints Malay Kumar Sinha, Special Director, IB, as Secretary (Security) in Cabinet Secretariat (See 'Mixed Buzz') Make in India Week - Maharashtra expects huge investment in manufacturing Hopeful of passing bills on realty regulator, GST in Budget session: Venkaiah Naidu Indian exporters got tariff relief worth USD 4.4 bn through GSP in 2014: US Ambassador (See 'Mixed Buzz') SC refuses to restrain states from banning mobile internet, saying that such steps are necessary to maintain law and order Thailand accepts protocol amending TRIPS Agreement (See 'Mixed Buzz') Service tax evasion case booked by DGCEI - Makemytrip deposits Rs 42 Crore (See 'Mixed Buzz') Cus - Refusal by Appellate Commissioner to grant refund on ground that department's appeals are pending before HC would tantamount to ensuring stay against CESTAT order & is patently illegal - HC (See 'Breaking News') Customs - Board revamps SVB + Revamped Special Valuation Branch guidelines.. Better late than never!!! (See 'DDT') ST - No liability arises on appellant prior to 16.06.2005 on repairs of transformers received from various SEBs as tender process through which appellant got contract is only a 'work order' and contract for repair: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') FTP - Procedure for export of sesame seeds to the European Union countries - Deferment of implementation (See 'DDT') VAT - Whether consequential order passed by Appellate Authority in Stay Petition is non-est in eye of law, when Appellate Authority holds that there is no jurisdiction to adjudicate issues raised? - Yes, rules HC (See 'Breaking News') Focus on CENVAT scheme and procedural simplification (See 'Budget Run-up') I-T - Whether assessee can be treated as assessee in default, for not deducting TDS on 'likely to be paid interest', which was ultimately reversed in books - NO: HC (See 'Breaking News') Are two registrations required under CE Law for a dealer? (See 'Budget Run-up')
 
Bookmark and Share
Service Tax - Chit Funds not taxable under 'Banking and other financial services' - Board Circular quashed: AP High Court

By TIOL News Service

HYDERABAD, OCT 14, 2008 : IN the writ petitions, the petitioners sought for a mandamus and assailing the correctness of CBEC circular No. 96/7/2007-ST (Reference Code. 034-04) dated 23.8.2007 and proceedings No. HAST 141/2007 dated 18.12.2007 issued by the Commissioner as being violative of Article 14, 19 (1) (g) and 265 of the Constitution of India and Section 65 (12) read with section 65 (105) (zm) of the Finance Act, 1994 and to set aside the same.   The case of the petitioners is that they are doing business in chit funds, the transactions of which are clearly covered by the provisions of the A.P. Chit Funds Act, 1971 and the Rules made thereunder.  According to them, very nature of transaction stands quite apart.

The Board Circular may be seen for a clear understanding:

Services are provided in relation to chit funds. Chit Funds are of two types, namely :-

(a) Simple Chit Funds: In this case, members agree to contribute to the fund a certain amount at regular interval. Lots are drawn periodically and the member, whose name appears, gets the periodical collection. No separate amount is charged from the members.

(b) Business Chit Funds: In this case, there is a promoter known as foreman who draws up the terms and conditions of the scheme and enrolls subscribers. Every subscriber has to pay his subscription in regular installments. The foreman charges a separate amount for the services provided. Some States prescribe a ceiling limit for the amount to be charged by such promoter for the services provided. Commission amount is retained by the promoter as consideration for providing the services in relation to chit fund.

Whether services provided in relation to chit fund is leviable to service tax under “banking and other financial services” or not?

The Board’s clarification reads as,

Reserve Bank of India has clarified that the business of a chit fund is to mobilize cash from the subscribers and effectively cause movement of such cash to keep it working and, therefore, the activity of chit funds is in the nature of cash management.

(a) In the case of Simple Chit Funds, no consideration is paid or received for the services provided and, therefore, the question of levy of service tax does not arise.

(b) In the case of Business Chit Funds, cash management service is provided for a consideration and, therefore, leviable to service tax under “banking and other financial services”.

The petitioners made it clear to the Department that the very assumption by the respondents to treat the chit fund business to fall within the ambit of asset management is not correct nor valid in law and further pointed out that there is subtle difference between the banking and financial services as defined under the Act with that of the Chit transactions, therefore, no liability can be fastened on them.

Further it is pointed out that the Department cannot levy a tax for the first time on a totally new arena by issuance of a circular.  As long as the Finance Act is not properly modified or amended to bring within its fold the chit transactions, the demand made by the Department is totally unsustainable. 

It was further pointed out that even when the Budget proposals were made for 2007-08, the Hon’ble Finance Minister did not give any indication that the cash management would include the chit fund business and therefore it is neither the policy decision nor the law as enunciated at the relevant point of time to bring the chit fund business within the ambit of the asset management and thus the entire levy and demand is totally illegal, unconstitutional and as such liable to be set aside. 

The High Court observed,

It is not disputed that the taxing statute needs to be interpreted strictly.  It must be very specific about its levy rather than to import deeming interpretation.  The petitioners specifically raised a plea in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition that at the time of introduction of the service tax before 1994 or later when the Finance Act has undergone amendment and during the discussions of the Budget proposals, no indication was given by the Finance Minister to extend the provisions of service tax to the chit funds business.  There is no denial on this aspect nor there is any explanation.  Therefore, be it an asset management or cash management, both expressions strictly speaking did not find place in the definition clauses under any of the Finance Acts.  It does not include or exclude the chit transaction or business specifically.  There cannot be any dispute that the very nature of business and transaction under the chits as can be culled out from the provisions of the Chit Fund Act and it stands on its own as a class.  It does not have any parlance or similarity to that of normal transactions as one understood under the law or commercially.   Admittedly, there is no provision whatsoever by including specifically the chits within the meaning of either ‘cash management’ or ‘asset management’.  Therefore, irrespective of such amendment either by earlier inclusion or later exclusion of those expressions, it will not have bearing on the chit transaction.

The HC recalled the basic principles of taxation:

  • No tax can be imposed on the subject without words in the Act clearly showing an intention to lay a burden upon him.
  • The subject cannot be taxed unless he comes within the letter of the law; the argument that he falls within the spirit of the law cannot avail the Department.

  • Tax and equity are strangers and an equitable construction cannot be put upon the words of a taxing statute.
     
  • In a taxing Act one has to look merely at what is clearly said.  There is no room for any intendment.  There is no equity about a tax.  There is no presumption as to a tax.  Nothing is to be read in, nothing is to be implied.  One can only look fairly at the language used

Therefore in the absence of a specific statutory definition of ‘cash management’ or even ‘asset management’, the question of its wider interpretation either by seeking to include or exclude any other transactions or business does not arise and is not permissible and any such act on the part of the executive would certainly be in the teeth of Article 265 of the Constitution of India.  

The entire action on the part of the respondents in trying to extend the levy of the tax for the first time by way of a circular is merely an executive fiat, which is not permissible under the law.  

The impugned circular dated 23.8.2007 and consequential proceedings dated 18.12.2007 are set aside and accordingly the writ petitions are allowed.

(See 2008-TIOL-502-HC-AP-ST in 'Service Tax' + 2008-TIOL-502-HC-AP-ST in 'Legal Corner')


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
 
 
Download TIOL App
TIOL SEARCH
 
TIOL Subscriptions
 All-In-One Package
 Indirect Tax Package
 Income Tax Package
<< More Packages>>
 
   
HOME    BACK TO TOP   
             
Income Tax Customs Excise Service Tax FEMA DGFT SEZ Misc Pitara Budget
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Instructions
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • ITAT Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Other Cases
  • Directorate of Income Tax (Systems)
  • Tariff Notfn
  • CVD
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • Anti-dumping Notfn
  • Safeguard Duty Notfn
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Drawback Cases
  • MISC Circulars
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Clean Energy Cess Notfn
  • Excise Amendment
  • MISC Circulars
  • 37B Order
  • Commr.(A) Order
  • Settlement
  • Tribunal
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • FAQ
  • Finance Act, 1994
  • Commr. (A) Orders
  • 37B Order
  • Removal of Difficulty
  • VCES
  • Accounting Head
  • Miscellaneous
  • Exchange Manual
  • Fema Notifications
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • RBI Notifications
  • RBI Circulars
  • Act
  • Rules
  • Regulations
  • Master Circulars
  • PMLA Notifications
  • Depository Scheme
  • Press Note
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Public Notices
  • Trade Notice
  • FTDR Amendment 2010
  • Notifications
  • Instructions
  • Act 2005
  • Rules 2006
  • DGEP
  • State Acts
  • State Policy
  • MISC
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • VAT Cases
  • Service News
  • Promotion
  • Transfer
  • Deputation Posts
  • Cadre Review
  • Transfer Policy
  • Training Circulars
  • Recruitment Rules
  • Pay Commission
  • Service Cases
  • The Insider
  • MISC
  • Budget Speeches
  • Union Budgets
  • Economic Surveys
  • TRU - D. O. Letter
  • Finance Acts
  • Finance Bill
  • Budget Circular
  • A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2015 Taxindiaonline.com Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved. | Powered by 4th Dimension