News Update

Sales Tax - 'sale price' apart from including consideration for sale, also includes value of any discount or rebate offered, which is to be deducted from sale price: SCGST - GoM on IT to review progress made by GSTN so far on SaturdayRailways inducts two digitally enabled LocomotivesADB loans USD 84 mn for improving water supply in Bhagalpur & GayaIAS Association delegation meets Dr Jitendra SinghFodder scam - Laloo pleads for bail; Jharkhand HC says NOIES officers to get new houses soonIndia successfully testifires N-capable ballistic missile ‘Dhanush’ from Naval Ship off Orissa coastIndian, Canadian PMs resolve to expedite BIPA & CEPA pactsCBDT notifies India-Kenya DTAA (See 'http://www.taxindiainternational.com/')GST on 'Commission' Received in Convertible Foreign Exchange – Part-I (See 'TOG Insight' in Taxongo.com)Electoral Bond Scheme to open on Mar 1 for 10 daysNDMA organises workshop on action plan to deal with heat waveRailways organises suppliers' Samvad; Digital Challan launchedChanges in the business connection provision (See 'Edit' in 'taxindiainternational.com')I-T - Department has no right to re-examine entire issue from a different angle, if returned income of assessee is accepted barring minor adjustment of expenditure claim: HCGST Council meeting - pointers from Industry for considerationCus - CBLR, 2013 - Prohibition - Even orders passed under Regulation 23 are appealable u/s 129A of CA, 1962: HCCertain grey areas in Taxability of 'Bill to - Ship to' TransactionsST - Refund - Banking services and technical inspection & certification services are co-related with export; are Input services: HCGovt notifies Electoral Bonds; Political parties can encash bonds only through bankBig relief for Indian students joining MBBS abroad; Govt grants them exemption from qualifying NEETFinance Commission invites inputs for widening of tax baseCanada to aid India in research effortsCivil Services Day - Four priority programmes listed for PM's AwardsI-T - When assessee diverted sum received for procuring import licences for purchase of shares, such advance is to be construed as deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e): HCI-T - If Revenue initiates penalty proceedings after six months of receipt of adjudicatory order, such proceeding is beyond period of limitation imposed u/s 275: HCGST Council to meet on March 10 through video conferencing; likely to approve new GSTR design and many amendment in GST lawsPNB fraud - ED & Income Tax continue to seize luxury vehicles & assets of Nirav Modi & ChoksiBank Frauds - Taxpayers tired to pay for 'New Civilisation'!I-T - It is clear case of barking up wrong tree if Revenue records show no tax arrears against assessee: HCIntermediary services to foreign parties-inter-state or intra-state supply?
 
ABC of Rule 6 - What is P??

MARCH 3, 2008

By R Raghavendra Rao

THE obligation of the manufacturer of dutiable and exempted goods under Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules has always been a matter of dispute. Where the assessees do not maintain separate accounts for the inputs used in exempted goods and dutiable goods, the demands made at the rate 10% on the value of the exempted goods did not stand the judicial scrutiny in cases where the proportionate credit was reversed instead of paying 10%, following the ratio of Supreme Court ruling in Chandrapur Magnet Wires (P) Ltd (2002-TIOL-41-SC-CX). The latest amendment made to Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules appears to be aimed at giving effect to the Chandrapur Magnet ratio by providing an option to the manufacturers /service providers to reverse the proportionate credit or to pay 10% or 8% on the value of the exempted goods/services, as the case may be. The rule contains several formulae represented by letters of the English alphabet from A to P. For easy understanding,  the letters and what they represent are tabulated as under:

Letter

What it means

A

CENVAT credit attributable to inputs used in or in relation to manufacture of exempted goods in a month

B

Total value of exempted services provided during the preceding financial year.

C

total value of dutiable goods manufactured and removed plus the total value of taxable services provided plus the total value of exempted services provided, during the preceding financial year

D

total CENVAT credit taken on inputs during the month minus A.

E

total value of exempted services provided plus the total value of exempted goods manufactured and removed during the preceding
financial year

F

total value of taxable and exempted services provided and total value of dutiable and exempted goods manufactured and removed, during the preceding financial year

G

total CENVAT credit taken on input services during the month

H

the amount of CENVAT credit attributable to inputs used in or in relation to manufacture of exempted goods in the current financial year.

I

Missing…..????? unintentional???

J

the total value of exempted services provided during the current financial year

K

the total value of dutiable goods manufactured and removed plus the total value of taxable services provided plus the total value of exempted services provided, during the current financial year

L

total CENVAT credit taken on inputs during the current financial year minus H

M

total value of taxable and exempted services provided, and total value of dutiable and exempted goods manufactured and removed, during the current financial year

N

total CENVAT credit taken on input services during the current financial year

O

Missing…..not used

P

Used in the Rule, but not explained what is P….

Upto L, the rule is clear and understandable, but when it comes to M, N and P, there is a mix up in drafting. M,N and P are parallel annual figures for E,F and G which are used for provisionally determining the monthly credit payable on the input services used in exempted goods and services.  Therefore the correct position should be:

M

total value of exempted services provided plus the total value of exempted goods manufactured and removed during the current
financial year

N

total value of taxable and exempted services provided, and total value of dutiable and exempted goods manufactured and removed, during the current financial year

P

Total credit availed on the input services during the current financial year.

The relevant sub-rule 3A(c) reads now as under:

(iii) the amount attributable to input services used in or in relation to manufacture of exempted goods or provision of exempted services = (M/N) multiplied by P, where L denotes total value of exempted services provided plus the total value of exempted goods manufactured and removed during the financial year, M denotes total value of taxable and exempted services provided, and total value of dutiable and exempted goods manufactured and removed, during the financial year, and N denotes total CENVAT credit taken on input services during the financial year;

This should read as:

(iii) the amount attributable to input services used in or in relation to manufacture of exempted goods or provision of exempted services = (M/N) multiplied by P, where M denotes total value of exempted services provided plus the total exempted goods manufactured and removed during the financial year, N denotes total value of taxable and exempted services provided, and total value of dutiable and exempted goods manufactured and removed, during the financial year, and P denotes total CENVAT credit taken on input services during the financial year;

Therefore an immediate amendment is required in the above rule.

Further, there is also a need to have a re-look at D which has been defined as the credit taken on the inputs during the month minus A (credit attributable to the inputs used in the manufacture of exempted goods during the month). Since the inputs on which credit is taken during the month are not used completely in the same month, it may be appropriate to define D as total credit attributable to the inputs used in the manufacture of final products during the month minus the credit attributable to the inputs used in the manufacture of exempted goods.

The provisional monthly amount payable has to be worked out as under :

1. Inputs used in exempted goods

A

2. Inputs used in exempted services

(B/C)XD

3. Input services used in exempted  goods/services

(E/F)XG

In respect of amount payable on the input services, in case 3 above, G has been defined as the total cenvat credit taken on the input services during the month. In effect, the amount to be reversed will be based on the ratio of the value of the exempted services /goods to the total value of the goods/services. However, sub-rule 5 of Rule 6 provides that full credit is allowed on certain common services used notwithstanding the sub-rules 1,2 and 3. Now, these amounts will also have to be included for arriving at G above, which means that the full credit allowed under sub-rule 5 on common services will also be divided now in the ratio of E/F. Therefore the formula in third case is in direct conflict with sub-rule 5 and G may have to be redefined.

(All See related analysis - Rule 6 Calculus)

(The views expressed by the author are personal)


POST YOUR COMMENTS