Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com HRindiaonline.com
 
LOGIN
Forgot Password |  Register
Monday , October 20, 2014 | Updated : Oct 20, 23:10 IST
Income Tax    Customs    Excise    Service Tax    FEMA    DGFT    SEZ    Misc    Pitara    Budget   
About Us Contact Us Advertise
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com
NEWS FLASH
 
Mangalore Airport Customs seizes gold concealed in toy jeep & dog from pax coming from Dubai Govt sets up Committee to study Corporate Bankruptcy Legal Framework by February; Former Lok Sabha Secretary General T K Vishwanathan is appointed Chairman IIMC to be upgraded to Communication University, says Minister (See 'Mixed Buzz') I-T - Whether every disclosure of an item of income over and above what is mentioned in return can by itself be treated as an act of concealment attracting action u/s 271: HC (See '2014-TIOL-1836') CBEC clarifies on determination of Place of Removal (See Cir 988 in 'What's New') Guwahati & Shillong Customs seizes opium and arrest 3 persons in joint operation Cadre Review: CBEC wraps up DPC for promotion of Group B to Group A; Order being finalised India needs to step R&D in medical field, says PM Long Term Bonds - Concessional TDS - CBDT Conditions (See 'DDT' Column) ST - CENVAT Credit on inputs with respect to services used in construction of immovable property which is subject to service tax under renting of immovable property eligible: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Trade-Based Money Laundering - An Impediment to Trade Facilitation (See 'Guest' Column) Income tax - Whether if assessee faces financial hardships and gets no support from its CA and has no staff, it constitutes reasonable cause for purpose of penalty u/s 272A(2) - YES: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') Charge-sheet Against CE Commissioner - CAT Declines to interfere (See 'DDT') CX - Supplier delaying payment of duty on capital goods - interest u/s 11AB for period from date of availment of credit to date of payment of duty is on supplier manufacturer and not on respondent: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Cabinet okays India's participation in development of Chahbahar Port in Iran (See 'Mixed Buzz') In-house weekly Training for Babus (See 'DDT') I-T - Whether once a party has challenged order of Tribunal on an application for rectification, appeal u/s 260A is not maintainable: HC (See '2014-TIOL-1829') FDI having good impact on women empowerment but gender inequality is a concern: UNCTAD Study (See 'Mixed Buzz') BJP falls short of majority in Maharashtra + bags clean majority in Haryana Coal Scam: CBI registers fresh case against Jindal Steel; conducts searches Cabinet okays framework for relaxations & extensions of PSC regime for early monetization of hydrocarbon discoveries (See 'Breaking News') CCEA okays financial support to MTNL to pay MAT demand (See 'Mixed Buzz') CCEA approves New Domestic Gas Pricing Policy (See 'Breaking News') I-T - Whether when consideration received is from sale of property under a solitary transaction, such consideration is liable to be treated as in nature of adventure or trade: HC (See '2014-TIOL-1824') Ahmedabad Metro Rail Project gets Cabinet nod (See 'Mixed Buzz') Cus - High Protein Poultry Mash is preparation used in animal feeding and is rightly classifiable under Ch. 2302 of CETA or Ch. 2309 of CTA & not under 23.01 of CETA, 1985 - Appeals rejected: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Modi(fied) direct benefit transfer scheme for LPG to be relaunched (See 'Mixed Buzz') CCEA grants ex post facto approval to fertiliser subsidy for last fiscal (See 'Mixed Buzz') Diwali surge in gold smuggling; Customs steps up vigil on airports and land customs stations Kolkata Airport Customs seizes gold worth Rs 16 lakhs from three pax Modi Sarkar finally deregulates diesel price fixation; Diesel rate to be down by more than Rs 3 per litre from midnight; Rangarajan Report on gas price rejected Union Cabinet decides to transfer LPG subsidy directly to bank accounts Black Money issue - Govt's approach is not adventurist, says FM Country-Wide Passport Seva Camp to be launched today (See 'Mixed Buzz') Swiss Revenue agrees to share information on names figuring in HSBC stolen data; Centre moves SC on confidentiality of tax treaty data (See 'Breaking News') Transportation of Postal mail in Public Transport buses - ST liability? (See 'ST se GST tak' Column) Cus - In spite of appellant being registered STPI unit, SVB examined relationship - principal supplier has not sold goods to any third party but supplied to affiliated companies only, loading of nominal profit of 1% would suffice: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') ED looking for Special Director on deputation basis (See 'Pitara')
 
Bookmark and Share
Condonation of delay - At toss to meet end of justice!

By Neha Pandit, Advocate

'INTEREST Republicae up sit finis litum' is the basis of the provisions of limitation in any law, but to uphold the "Principles of Natural Justice" and to reach the end of justice, the clause of "CONDONATION OF DELAY" (COD) has been incorporated in it.

The Authorities of justice can condone the delay to advance substantial justice. Therefore, delay can be condoned if sufficient cause is shown for not presenting appeal in time. Though delay up to last day of filing an appeal need not be explained, but, delay thereafter has to be explained.

Power of Commissioner (Appeals) to condone delay

Delay may be due to genuine reasons. Hence, Commissioner Appeals can condone delay up to 30 days. As per the provisions of law, Commissioner of Appeals has no powers to condone delay beyond 30 days.

Whether Tribunal can go beyond the law and condone such delay and remand the matter back to the Commissioner Appeals? To meet the end of justice, whether strict adherence of law in such matters is justifiable?

Initially, in Rayman Shoe Co. V. CCE, it was held that Commissioner cannot condone delay (beyond 30 days) and Tribunal cannot order Commissioner to condone delay and hear the case on merits or condone delay itself. Tribunal can't go into the merits of the case.

Bangalore Bench, in a number of cases, specially, in Shri Vishnu Process v. CCE, Bangalore (2005-TIOL-1506-CESTAT-BANG) held that Tribunal cannot exercise any power where statute has fixed the period for COD in a case where statute has not given any power to the Authority to condone the delay beyond the statutory period on sufficient cause being shown.

Similar view has been taken in Abhishek Auto Industries v. CC, Mumbai wherein it was held that Commissioner Appeals is not competent to entertain an appeal beyond the period on 90 days in view of specific provision contained in section 128 (1) of Customs Act, 1962.

Therefore, lawfully, if the statute provides for a period of limitation and further maximum period of limitation for which delay can be condoned, the Authority cannot extend the same.

If the legislature in its wisdom has fixed a maximum period for doing a particular thing, the Authority is not competent to prescribe the period beyond it.

Conflicting Decisions

Recently, a conflicting view has been taken by the Tribunal, Chennai, while deciding Raj and Co. v. CC, Chennai (2006-TIOL-1607-CESTAT-MAD) wherein the Tribunal condoned the delay of 256 days in filing Appeal before Commissioner Appeals and directed Ld. Commissioner Appeals to dispose off the Appeal too.

"In nutshell, Tribunal surpassed the provisions of law to meet the end of justice ".

Liberal views of COD while dealing with the Govt

Another irony could be viewed in similar matters, wherein the delay of the Government is condoned, and their cases are remanded back to the Commissioner Appeals for the adjudication.

In the case of Asst. Collector of CCE, Nagapattinam v. Marimuthu, the High Court of Madras, condoned delay of 131 days for a Govt Department on the ground that records were messed up with other papers in the office and the case was remanded.

The law of limitation, no doubt, is the same for a Private Citizen as for Governmental authorities. Government, like any other litigant must take responsibility for the Acts or omission of its officers. The provisions of law applicable to the government and private person are same and hence the expression sufficient cause cannot be construed too liberally because party in default is Government.

CONCLUSION

Rules of limitation are not meant to destroy the rights of parties. They are meant to see that parties do not resort to dilatory tactics, but see their remedy promptly.

"The technicalities of law cannot prevent court for doing substantial justice". Despite that, sometimes, the adoption of strict standard of proof (regarding reasons for the delay in filing appeal) tends to grave miscarriage of public justice.

Now the question, whether adherence to strict standards of law, that goes against justice should be followed?

(The author is a Bangalore-based Advocate)


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: delay condonation by commissioner Appeals

In the case of Delta Impex 2004/173/ELT/449 The Hon'ble High Court Delhi held that when maximum time limit is specified or a condonable period is prescribed delay within the condonable period alone can be condoned.similarly in the case of M.R. Tobacco the Hon'ble High Court Delhi once agian emphasised that Commissioner Appeals cannot condone delay beyond 30 days and this view was upheld by the Apex Court in 2007/213/ELT/A115. The decision of the Chennai Bench refered in the article was not for condonation of 256 days of delay but to ascertain the correct date of receipt of the order and then the Bench observed that there was no delay if the date of receipt was taken correctly.
SDR CHENNAI

Posted by Joint Chief Departmental Representative
 
 
 
TIOL Mobile App
TIOL SEARCH
 
TIOL Subscriptions
 All-In-One Package
 Indirect Tax Package
 Income Tax Package
<< More Packages>>
 
   
             
Income Tax Customs Excise Service Tax FEMA DGFT SEZ Misc Pitara Budget
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • ITAT Cases
  • Instructions
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Other Case
  • Directorate of Income Tax (Systems)
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Safeguard Duty Notfn
  • Anti-dumping Notfn
  • Drawback Cases
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Excise Amendment
  • Clean Energy Cess Notfn
  • MISC Circulars
  • 37B Order
  • Commr.(A) Order
  • CESTAT
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Miscellaneous
  • Advance Ruling
  • FAQ
  • Finance Act, 1994
  • Commr. (A) Orders
  • 37B Order
  • Removal of Difficulty
  • VCES
  • Accounting Head
  • Exchange Manual
  • Fema Notifications
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • RBI Notifications
  • Act
  • Rules
  • Regulations
  • Master Circulars
  • RBI Circulars
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Public Notices
  • Trade Notice
  • FTDR Amendment 2010
  • MISC
  • State Acts
  • Notifications
  • Instructions
  • Act 2005
  • Rules 2006
  • DGEP
  • State Policy
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • VAT Cases
  • Deputation Posts
  • Service News
  • The Insider
  • Transfer
  • Promotion
  • Recruitment Rules
  • Transfer Policy
  • Training Circulars
  • Service Cases
  • MISC
  • Pay Commission
  • Cadre Review
  • Budget Circular 2013-14
  • Union Budgets
  • Economic Surveys
  • Budget Speeches
  • Finance Acts
  • Finance Bill
  • TRU - D. O. Letter
  • A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2014 Taxindiaonline.com Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved. | Powered by 4th Dimension