Taxindiaonline.com
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com TIOL Tube Taxindiainternational.com
 
LOGIN
Forgot Password |  Register  
Saturday , July 30, 2016 | Updated : Jul 30, 20:59 IST
Income Tax    Customs    Excise    Service Tax    FEMA    DGFT    SEZ    Misc    Pitara    Budget   
About Us Contact Us Advertise
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com
 
 
NEWS FLASH
 
Income Tax - Protest by IRS officers - Association meets Finance Minister; Issues to be 'suitably addressed', says Jaitley (See 'Breaking News') Sovereign Gold Bond Scheme - Govt mops up Rs 919 Crore in 4th tranche (See 'Breaking News') Delhi DRI seizes foreign brand cigarettes worth Rs 54 lakh from containers of HDPE granules bags worth Rs 7.5 Cr at ICD Tughlakabad Hundreds of Indians become jobless in Jeddah; VK Singh flying off to iron out issues Amritsar Airport Customs seizes Venezuelan Currency worth Rs 33 lakhs from pax coming from Dubai China flays stiff anti-dumping duty by EU Watch TIOL TUBE's latest episode of The Week That Was for odyssey of 25 years of economic reforms since 1991 ... Govt okays commissioning of Hotline between India & China Military Hqs (See 'Mixed Buzz') Is BLOOD a drug? - YES, says Minister (See 'Mixed Buzz') Settlement Commission - Explanation to Sec 32(O)(1) of CE Act cannot be applied retrospectively - Settlement Commission has erred in rejecting application u/s 32(O)(1) - Matter remanded: HC (See 'Breaking News') Railway Board Chairman A K Mital retired yesterday; Govt extends his services for two years CBDT extends Income Tax Return Filing dates on all India basis to Aug 5, 2016 and for J&K taxpayers upto Aug 31, 2016 (See 'Order' in 'What's New') Procedure for exports through FPO, Delhi/Mumbai/Chennai using ecommerce platform under MEIS Scheme (See 'Cir 36' in What's New) Implementation of revised pay - Allowances to continue until decision taken; zero DA from Jan 1, 2016 (See 'Pay Commission' in Pitara) Indian diplomatic missions in China caution traders about China's impex fraud Nitish govt to make prohibition law more stringent No law to scrap 15-yr-old diesel vehicles: Govt tells NGT No one will be denied of benefits for want of Aadhaar: Venkaiah Naidu Petro Investment Regions to create 34 lakhs jobs: Minister (See 'Mixed Buzz') Ease of doing business - Removal of mandatory warehousing requirements for EOUs, STPIs, EHTPs etc. w.e.f 13.08.2016 - Amendment to Notification 52/2003- Customs dated 31.03.2003 (See 'Not 44 & Cir 35' in What's New) CBEC increases Tariff Value of Gold, Silver, All Oils & Brass Scrap (See 'NT-104' in What's New) CX - Legislature can enact laws to operate retrospectively and enforce an earlier invalid legislation - Rule 57F(4A) of CER, 1944 providing lapsing of credit was limb of rationalization & is not irrational: High Court (See 'Breaking News') Income Tax return-filing - Special arrangements for Saturday & Sunday (See 'Instructions' in Income Tax') CBDT issues Addl charge order for four CCITs (See 'Service News' in Pitara) CAG's Objections on CENVAT Credit (See 'DDT' Column) IRS Revolt - Jaitley Not Amused (See 'DDT') I-T - Whether payment of interest to FIs by way of debentures amounts to 'actual payment' for purpose of deduction u/s 43B - NO: HC (See 'Breaking News') ACC appoints B V Sudhakar as New Secretary, Department of Posts PM wants Niti Aayog to put on hat of innovative experiments in India ACC okays several key appointments; B P Sharma is new DoP&T Secretary (See 'Mixed Buzz') Cabinet okays abolition of Guidelines for JV by Defence PSUs (See 'Mixed Buzz') Resolution passed by Mumbai Income Tax officers against DoR - FM says it is insubordination; Action to be taken under Conduct Rules 291 babus on foreign postings; 5 overstayed tenure: Jitendra Singh Strategic Forces Command out of RTI ambit: DoPT
 
Bookmark and Share
Condonation of delay - At toss to meet end of justice!

By Neha Pandit, Advocate

'INTEREST Republicae up sit finis litum' is the basis of the provisions of limitation in any law, but to uphold the "Principles of Natural Justice" and to reach the end of justice, the clause of "CONDONATION OF DELAY" (COD) has been incorporated in it.

The Authorities of justice can condone the delay to advance substantial justice. Therefore, delay can be condoned if sufficient cause is shown for not presenting appeal in time. Though delay up to last day of filing an appeal need not be explained, but, delay thereafter has to be explained.

Power of Commissioner (Appeals) to condone delay

Delay may be due to genuine reasons. Hence, Commissioner Appeals can condone delay up to 30 days. As per the provisions of law, Commissioner of Appeals has no powers to condone delay beyond 30 days.

Whether Tribunal can go beyond the law and condone such delay and remand the matter back to the Commissioner Appeals? To meet the end of justice, whether strict adherence of law in such matters is justifiable?

Initially, in Rayman Shoe Co. V. CCE, it was held that Commissioner cannot condone delay (beyond 30 days) and Tribunal cannot order Commissioner to condone delay and hear the case on merits or condone delay itself. Tribunal can't go into the merits of the case.

Bangalore Bench, in a number of cases, specially, in Shri Vishnu Process v. CCE, Bangalore (2005-TIOL-1506-CESTAT-BANG) held that Tribunal cannot exercise any power where statute has fixed the period for COD in a case where statute has not given any power to the Authority to condone the delay beyond the statutory period on sufficient cause being shown.

Similar view has been taken in Abhishek Auto Industries v. CC, Mumbai wherein it was held that Commissioner Appeals is not competent to entertain an appeal beyond the period on 90 days in view of specific provision contained in section 128 (1) of Customs Act, 1962.

Therefore, lawfully, if the statute provides for a period of limitation and further maximum period of limitation for which delay can be condoned, the Authority cannot extend the same.

If the legislature in its wisdom has fixed a maximum period for doing a particular thing, the Authority is not competent to prescribe the period beyond it.

Conflicting Decisions

Recently, a conflicting view has been taken by the Tribunal, Chennai, while deciding Raj and Co. v. CC, Chennai (2006-TIOL-1607-CESTAT-MAD) wherein the Tribunal condoned the delay of 256 days in filing Appeal before Commissioner Appeals and directed Ld. Commissioner Appeals to dispose off the Appeal too.

"In nutshell, Tribunal surpassed the provisions of law to meet the end of justice ".

Liberal views of COD while dealing with the Govt

Another irony could be viewed in similar matters, wherein the delay of the Government is condoned, and their cases are remanded back to the Commissioner Appeals for the adjudication.

In the case of Asst. Collector of CCE, Nagapattinam v. Marimuthu, the High Court of Madras, condoned delay of 131 days for a Govt Department on the ground that records were messed up with other papers in the office and the case was remanded.

The law of limitation, no doubt, is the same for a Private Citizen as for Governmental authorities. Government, like any other litigant must take responsibility for the Acts or omission of its officers. The provisions of law applicable to the government and private person are same and hence the expression sufficient cause cannot be construed too liberally because party in default is Government.

CONCLUSION

Rules of limitation are not meant to destroy the rights of parties. They are meant to see that parties do not resort to dilatory tactics, but see their remedy promptly.

"The technicalities of law cannot prevent court for doing substantial justice". Despite that, sometimes, the adoption of strict standard of proof (regarding reasons for the delay in filing appeal) tends to grave miscarriage of public justice.

Now the question, whether adherence to strict standards of law, that goes against justice should be followed?

(The author is a Bangalore-based Advocate)


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: delay condonation by commissioner Appeals

In the case of Delta Impex 2004/173/ELT/449 The Hon'ble High Court Delhi held that when maximum time limit is specified or a condonable period is prescribed delay within the condonable period alone can be condoned.similarly in the case of M.R. Tobacco the Hon'ble High Court Delhi once agian emphasised that Commissioner Appeals cannot condone delay beyond 30 days and this view was upheld by the Apex Court in 2007/213/ELT/A115. The decision of the Chennai Bench refered in the article was not for condonation of 256 days of delay but to ascertain the correct date of receipt of the order and then the Bench observed that there was no delay if the date of receipt was taken correctly.
SDR CHENNAI

Posted by Joint Chief Departmental Representative
 
 
 
Download on the App Store
Get it on Google play
TIOL SEARCH
 
Visit TIOLCorplaws.com
TIOL Subscriptions
 All-In-One Package
 Indirect Tax Package
 Income Tax Package
<< More Packages>>
 
   
HOME    BACK TO TOP   
             
Income Tax Customs Excise Service Tax FEMA DGFT SEZ Misc Pitara Budget
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Instructions
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • ITAT Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Other Cases
  • Directorate of Income Tax (Systems)
  • Customs Rules
  • Tariff Notfn
  • CVD
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • Anti-dumping Notfn
  • Safeguard Duty Notfn
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Drawback Cases
  • MISC Circulars
  • CCRs - 2004
  • Central Excise Rules
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Cesses Notfications
  • Excise Amendment
  • MISC Circulars
  • 37B Order
  • Settlement
  • Commr.(A) Order
  • Tribunal
  • Service Tax Rules
  • 37B Order
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • FAQ
  • Finance Act, 1994
  • Commr. (A) Orders
  • Removal of Difficulty
  • VCES
  • Accounting Head
  • Miscellaneous
  • DIPP Notification
  • Exchange Manual
  • Fema Notifications
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • RBI Notifications
  • RBI Circulars
  • Act
  • Rules
  • Regulations
  • Master Circulars
  • PMLA Notifications
  • Depository Scheme
  • Press Note
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Public Notices
  • Trade Notice
  • FTDR Amendment 2010
  • Notifications
  • Instructions
  • Act 2005
  • Rules 2006
  • DGEP
  • State Acts
  • State Policy
  • MISC
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • VAT Cases
  • Service News
  • Promotion
  • Transfer
  • Deputation Posts
  • Cadre Review
  • Transfer Policy
  • Training Circulars
  • Recruitment Rules
  • Pay Commission
  • Service Cases
  • The Insider
  • MISC
  • Budget Speeches
  • Union Budgets
  • Economic Surveys
  • TRU - D. O. Letter
  • Finance Acts
  • Finance Bill
  • Budget Circular
  • A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2016 Taxindiaonline.com Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved. | Powered by 4th Dimension