Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com HRindiaonline.com
 
LOGIN
Forgot Password |  Register
Tuesday , September 16, 2014 | Updated : Sep 16, 20:30 IST
Income Tax    Customs    Excise    Service Tax    FEMA    DGFT    SEZ    Misc    Pitara    Budget   
About Us Contact Us Advertise
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com
NEWS FLASH
 
CBEC notifies New Jurisdictions as per Cadre Review; 15 Notifications issued - 9 in Customs + 3 in CX + 3 in ST; to be effective from October 15, 2014 CBI nabs Administrative Officer of Dehradun Income Tax accepting bribe ACC appoints Aruna Sundararajan as Administrator of USOF in DoT + Amarjeet Sinha as Addl Secy in Department of Higher Education Neemuch CBN seizes heroin; arrests two persons Return-filing by Companies: CBDT extends due date to Nov 30 for J & K (See 'Instruction' in Income Tax) Amendment in Appeal provisions made by Finance Act, 2014: CBEC issues detailed clarifications (See Cir 984 in 'What's New') CBDT issues local transfer order of 8 CITs (See 'Transfer' in Pitara) SEZ Rules - Telangana inserted in place of AP (See 'SEZ Notifications') ST - Appellant entered into contracts with Taj TV Ltd., Dubai/Mauritius etc. to produce AV coverage of cricket match - activities undertaken by the non-resident service providers falls within the definition of "programme" and they are 'programme producers' – appellant liable to pay ST u/s 66A of FA, 1994: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') India inks loan deal with ADB for USD 63 mn for improving urban services CCEA approves Scheme to augment competitiveness in Indian Capital Goods Sector (See 'Breaking News') North East Exemption - The 1999 notification and 2003 Retro Amendment - Issue with Commissioner (A) via Supreme Court (See 'DDT') India, Vietnam join hands for Mutual Assistance in Customs matters (See 'Mixed Buzz') ST - Construction of Mall & renting of Shops - CENVAT of ST paid on input services used in construction of immovable property would be available if such property is used for rendering other taxable services - Stay granted: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Kolkata Customs seizes gold bars and bangles worth Rs 1.75 Crore (See 'Mixed Buzz') I-T - Whether when assessee makes investments to pick up controlling stake in company after FIPB approval, entire expenditure related to such investment is to be attributed to earning of dividend, and warrants disallowance u/s 14A - NO: HC (See 'Breaking News') Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules - Amended (See 'TIOL Library') CX - Aluminium dross and skimmings which arise as by-product in process of manufacture of aluminium products are 'manufactured' goods and hence excisable w.e.f. 10/05/2008 in view of Explanation added to Section 2(d): CESTAT Larger Bench (See 'Breaking News') Even if an order is in your favour, please read it carefully - otherwise you may lose what you have won (See 'DDT') PM takes stock of GST preparations; MoF to prepare CST compensation package for revenue loss to States CBI arrests Commandant of Railway Protection Force on bribery charges CBDT issues transfer order of 32 CITs in addition to 6 on Court’s direction (See 'Transfer' in Pitara) CBEC reduces tariff value of many goods across board (See NT 76 in 'What's New) Jaipur DRI seizes 3 kg gold from pax coming from Singapore CBEC Cadre Review: Board is fully geared to notify new jurisdictions of all Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax Commissionerates Chandrababu becomes first CM to hold paperless e-Cabinet meeting with iPads UP Govt exempts from VAT cycles costing less than Rs 3500 India signs seven agreements with Vietnam, including one in Oil Sector Service Tax Refund to buyers of individual flats - CESTAT Orders Refund (See 'Breaking News') ST Refund to buyers of individual flats (See 'DDT' Column) Battle against counterfeiting - how countries across globe tackle it? (See 'Guest' Column) Serious problems due to indifferent and uncooperative attitude of Chairperson CBEC (See 'DDT')
 
Bookmark and Share
Condonation of delay - At toss to meet end of justice!

By Neha Pandit, Advocate

'INTEREST Republicae up sit finis litum' is the basis of the provisions of limitation in any law, but to uphold the "Principles of Natural Justice" and to reach the end of justice, the clause of "CONDONATION OF DELAY" (COD) has been incorporated in it.

The Authorities of justice can condone the delay to advance substantial justice. Therefore, delay can be condoned if sufficient cause is shown for not presenting appeal in time. Though delay up to last day of filing an appeal need not be explained, but, delay thereafter has to be explained.

Power of Commissioner (Appeals) to condone delay

Delay may be due to genuine reasons. Hence, Commissioner Appeals can condone delay up to 30 days. As per the provisions of law, Commissioner of Appeals has no powers to condone delay beyond 30 days.

Whether Tribunal can go beyond the law and condone such delay and remand the matter back to the Commissioner Appeals? To meet the end of justice, whether strict adherence of law in such matters is justifiable?

Initially, in Rayman Shoe Co. V. CCE, it was held that Commissioner cannot condone delay (beyond 30 days) and Tribunal cannot order Commissioner to condone delay and hear the case on merits or condone delay itself. Tribunal can't go into the merits of the case.

Bangalore Bench, in a number of cases, specially, in Shri Vishnu Process v. CCE, Bangalore (2005-TIOL-1506-CESTAT-BANG) held that Tribunal cannot exercise any power where statute has fixed the period for COD in a case where statute has not given any power to the Authority to condone the delay beyond the statutory period on sufficient cause being shown.

Similar view has been taken in Abhishek Auto Industries v. CC, Mumbai wherein it was held that Commissioner Appeals is not competent to entertain an appeal beyond the period on 90 days in view of specific provision contained in section 128 (1) of Customs Act, 1962.

Therefore, lawfully, if the statute provides for a period of limitation and further maximum period of limitation for which delay can be condoned, the Authority cannot extend the same.

If the legislature in its wisdom has fixed a maximum period for doing a particular thing, the Authority is not competent to prescribe the period beyond it.

Conflicting Decisions

Recently, a conflicting view has been taken by the Tribunal, Chennai, while deciding Raj and Co. v. CC, Chennai (2006-TIOL-1607-CESTAT-MAD) wherein the Tribunal condoned the delay of 256 days in filing Appeal before Commissioner Appeals and directed Ld. Commissioner Appeals to dispose off the Appeal too.

"In nutshell, Tribunal surpassed the provisions of law to meet the end of justice ".

Liberal views of COD while dealing with the Govt

Another irony could be viewed in similar matters, wherein the delay of the Government is condoned, and their cases are remanded back to the Commissioner Appeals for the adjudication.

In the case of Asst. Collector of CCE, Nagapattinam v. Marimuthu, the High Court of Madras, condoned delay of 131 days for a Govt Department on the ground that records were messed up with other papers in the office and the case was remanded.

The law of limitation, no doubt, is the same for a Private Citizen as for Governmental authorities. Government, like any other litigant must take responsibility for the Acts or omission of its officers. The provisions of law applicable to the government and private person are same and hence the expression sufficient cause cannot be construed too liberally because party in default is Government.

CONCLUSION

Rules of limitation are not meant to destroy the rights of parties. They are meant to see that parties do not resort to dilatory tactics, but see their remedy promptly.

"The technicalities of law cannot prevent court for doing substantial justice". Despite that, sometimes, the adoption of strict standard of proof (regarding reasons for the delay in filing appeal) tends to grave miscarriage of public justice.

Now the question, whether adherence to strict standards of law, that goes against justice should be followed?

(The author is a Bangalore-based Advocate)


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: delay condonation by commissioner Appeals

In the case of Delta Impex 2004/173/ELT/449 The Hon'ble High Court Delhi held that when maximum time limit is specified or a condonable period is prescribed delay within the condonable period alone can be condoned.similarly in the case of M.R. Tobacco the Hon'ble High Court Delhi once agian emphasised that Commissioner Appeals cannot condone delay beyond 30 days and this view was upheld by the Apex Court in 2007/213/ELT/A115. The decision of the Chennai Bench refered in the article was not for condonation of 256 days of delay but to ascertain the correct date of receipt of the order and then the Bench observed that there was no delay if the date of receipt was taken correctly.
SDR CHENNAI

Posted by Joint Chief Departmental Representative
 
 
 
TIOL SEARCH
 
TIOL Mobile App
TIOL Subscriptions
 All-In-One Package
 Indirect Tax Package
 Income Tax Package
<< More Packages>>
 
   
             
Income Tax Customs Excise Service Tax FEMA DGFT SEZ Misc Pitara Budget
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • ITAT Cases
  • Instructions
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Other Case
  • Directorate of Income Tax (Systems)
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Safeguard Duty Notfn
  • Anti-dumping Notfn
  • Drawback Cases
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Excise Amendment
  • Clean Energy Cess Notfn
  • MISC Circulars
  • 37B Order
  • Commr.(A) Order
  • CESTAT
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Miscellaneous
  • Advance Ruling
  • FAQ
  • Finance Act, 1994
  • Commr. (A) Orders
  • 37B Order
  • Removal of Difficulty
  • VCES
  • Accounting Head
  • Exchange Manual
  • Fema Notifications
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • RBI Notifications
  • Act
  • Rules
  • Regulations
  • Master Circulars
  • RBI Circulars
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Public Notices
  • Trade Notice
  • FTDR Amendment 2010
  • MISC
  • State Acts
  • Notifications
  • Instructions
  • Act 2005
  • Rules 2006
  • DGEP
  • State Policy
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • VAT Cases
  • Deputation Posts
  • Service News
  • The Insider
  • Transfer
  • Promotion
  • Recruitment Rules
  • Transfer Policy
  • Training Circulars
  • Service Cases
  • MISC
  • Pay Commission
  • Cadre Review
  • Budget Circular 2013-14
  • Union Budgets
  • Economic Surveys
  • Budget Speeches
  • Finance Acts
  • Finance Bill
  • TRU - D. O. Letter
  • A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2014 Taxindiaonline.com Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved. | Powered by 4th Dimension