Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com HRindiaonline.com
 
LOGIN
Forgot Password |  Register
Sunday , May 31, 2015 | Updated : May 30, 23:40 IST
Income Tax    Customs    Excise    Service Tax    FEMA    DGFT    SEZ    Misc    Pitara    Budget   
About Us Contact Us Advertise
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com
NEWS FLASH
 
Swamy again reiterates not enough being done by Modi Govt to bring back black money from overseas banks Cabinet okays re-promulgation of land bill with amendment for better compensation Cabinet approves MOU on prevention of human trafficking with Bangladesh (See 'Mixed Buzz') FTP 2015 - 2020 - A simplified and streamlined scheme (See 'Guest' Column) CCEA okays project for Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor (See 'Mixed Buzz') Digital India Initiative - One lakh mark surpassed in 100 days (See 'Breaking News') Ahmedabad & Pune join 'X' Class for HRA benefits (See 'Mixed buzz') Whether Revenue should not assess tax based on purchase value, when assessee has sales turnover of less than Rs. 50 lac (See '2015-TIOL-1365-HC') Indian Railways sets up 'Technology Mission' for applied research (See 'Mixed Buzz') I-T- Whether access chargers paid by assessee to its parent company for allowing use of network to provide internet connectivity is laible for TDS (See '2015-TIOL-594-ITAT') India, Saudi Arabia resolve to explore investment options (See 'Mixed Buzz') CESTAT about to get SIX New Technical Members - Ashok Kumar Arya + P M Saleem + K M Ravichandran + C J Mathew + Raju + R K Singla Services Sector logs over 10% growth in last fiscal; Financial, professional & real estate services record 11.5% growth (See 'Breaking News') G S Reddy appointed as Scientific Advisor to Defence Minister for two years LexisNexis India acquires Universal Law Publishing Titles Delhi HC declines to stay levy of service tax on jobwork for alcohol production Tariff value of gold and silver reduced but hiked for RBD Palmolein (See 'NT 49' in What's New) CBEC looking for deputationists in Board (See 'Deputation Posts' in Pitara) FM favours powers to consumers to file class action suits FM to inaugurate New Bank Note Paper Mill at Hoshangabad tomorrow; With one more JV at Mysore Govt to save forex worth Rs 1500 Cr annually With 7.5% growth in Q4 Indian economy ends last fiscal with 7.3% growth rate Pradeep Kumar Sinha, IAS (UP:77) appointed as next Cabinet Secretary Dr S Christopher appointed as Secretary & Development-cum-Director General, DRDO Media always wins, says Big B PM reviews preparations for International Yoga Day Import of Rolls Royce Ghost - If Govt in its wisdom introduces a scheme under FTDR Act, benefit of such legislation is to be made available by Customs - MoC is responsible for FTP and has final say: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Service Tax - Audit of the Audit (See 'DDT' Column) ST - Coaching - curriculum imparts skills to students in accounting, which enables them to get employment - Factual matrix recorded by Commissioner(A) not contested by Revenue hence are to be held as correct - Benefit of notification 24/2004 available: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') New Service tax rate of 14% -Issues galore! (See 'ST se GST tak) Income tax - Whether any sum transferred to reserve fund is to be treated as business expenditure either under Ss 28 or 37 - NO: HC (See 'Breaking News') Service Tax - No Scrutiny of Assessment + ITAT Imposes Costs on CA (See 'DDT') Cus - CESTAT dismissing appeal for not complying with order of Pre-deposit of 50% - Sec 35F amendment cannot be restricted only for appeals filed after 06.08.2014 - Appellant directed to deposit 10% of duty confirmed: HC (See 'Breaking News') FEMA - Foreign Exchange Facility (See 'DDT')
 
Bookmark and Share
Condonation of delay - At toss to meet end of justice!

By Neha Pandit, Advocate

'INTEREST Republicae up sit finis litum' is the basis of the provisions of limitation in any law, but to uphold the "Principles of Natural Justice" and to reach the end of justice, the clause of "CONDONATION OF DELAY" (COD) has been incorporated in it.

The Authorities of justice can condone the delay to advance substantial justice. Therefore, delay can be condoned if sufficient cause is shown for not presenting appeal in time. Though delay up to last day of filing an appeal need not be explained, but, delay thereafter has to be explained.

Power of Commissioner (Appeals) to condone delay

Delay may be due to genuine reasons. Hence, Commissioner Appeals can condone delay up to 30 days. As per the provisions of law, Commissioner of Appeals has no powers to condone delay beyond 30 days.

Whether Tribunal can go beyond the law and condone such delay and remand the matter back to the Commissioner Appeals? To meet the end of justice, whether strict adherence of law in such matters is justifiable?

Initially, in Rayman Shoe Co. V. CCE, it was held that Commissioner cannot condone delay (beyond 30 days) and Tribunal cannot order Commissioner to condone delay and hear the case on merits or condone delay itself. Tribunal can't go into the merits of the case.

Bangalore Bench, in a number of cases, specially, in Shri Vishnu Process v. CCE, Bangalore (2005-TIOL-1506-CESTAT-BANG) held that Tribunal cannot exercise any power where statute has fixed the period for COD in a case where statute has not given any power to the Authority to condone the delay beyond the statutory period on sufficient cause being shown.

Similar view has been taken in Abhishek Auto Industries v. CC, Mumbai wherein it was held that Commissioner Appeals is not competent to entertain an appeal beyond the period on 90 days in view of specific provision contained in section 128 (1) of Customs Act, 1962.

Therefore, lawfully, if the statute provides for a period of limitation and further maximum period of limitation for which delay can be condoned, the Authority cannot extend the same.

If the legislature in its wisdom has fixed a maximum period for doing a particular thing, the Authority is not competent to prescribe the period beyond it.

Conflicting Decisions

Recently, a conflicting view has been taken by the Tribunal, Chennai, while deciding Raj and Co. v. CC, Chennai (2006-TIOL-1607-CESTAT-MAD) wherein the Tribunal condoned the delay of 256 days in filing Appeal before Commissioner Appeals and directed Ld. Commissioner Appeals to dispose off the Appeal too.

"In nutshell, Tribunal surpassed the provisions of law to meet the end of justice ".

Liberal views of COD while dealing with the Govt

Another irony could be viewed in similar matters, wherein the delay of the Government is condoned, and their cases are remanded back to the Commissioner Appeals for the adjudication.

In the case of Asst. Collector of CCE, Nagapattinam v. Marimuthu, the High Court of Madras, condoned delay of 131 days for a Govt Department on the ground that records were messed up with other papers in the office and the case was remanded.

The law of limitation, no doubt, is the same for a Private Citizen as for Governmental authorities. Government, like any other litigant must take responsibility for the Acts or omission of its officers. The provisions of law applicable to the government and private person are same and hence the expression sufficient cause cannot be construed too liberally because party in default is Government.

CONCLUSION

Rules of limitation are not meant to destroy the rights of parties. They are meant to see that parties do not resort to dilatory tactics, but see their remedy promptly.

"The technicalities of law cannot prevent court for doing substantial justice". Despite that, sometimes, the adoption of strict standard of proof (regarding reasons for the delay in filing appeal) tends to grave miscarriage of public justice.

Now the question, whether adherence to strict standards of law, that goes against justice should be followed?

(The author is a Bangalore-based Advocate)


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: delay condonation by commissioner Appeals

In the case of Delta Impex 2004/173/ELT/449 The Hon'ble High Court Delhi held that when maximum time limit is specified or a condonable period is prescribed delay within the condonable period alone can be condoned.similarly in the case of M.R. Tobacco the Hon'ble High Court Delhi once agian emphasised that Commissioner Appeals cannot condone delay beyond 30 days and this view was upheld by the Apex Court in 2007/213/ELT/A115. The decision of the Chennai Bench refered in the article was not for condonation of 256 days of delay but to ascertain the correct date of receipt of the order and then the Bench observed that there was no delay if the date of receipt was taken correctly.
SDR CHENNAI

Posted by Joint Chief Departmental Representative
 
 
 
Download TIOL App
TIOL SEARCH
 
TIOL Subscriptions
 All-In-One Package
 Indirect Tax Package
 Income Tax Package
<< More Packages>>
 
   
             
Income Tax Customs Excise Service Tax FEMA DGFT SEZ Misc Pitara Budget
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • ITAT Cases
  • Instructions
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Other Case
  • Directorate of Income Tax (Systems)
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Safeguard Duty Notfn
  • Anti-dumping Notfn
  • Drawback Cases
  • MISC Circulars
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Excise Amendment
  • Clean Energy Cess Notfn
  • MISC Circulars
  • 37B Order
  • Commr.(A) Order
  • CESTAT
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Miscellaneous
  • Advance Ruling
  • FAQ
  • Finance Act, 1994
  • Commr. (A) Orders
  • 37B Order
  • Removal of Difficulty
  • VCES
  • Accounting Head
  • Exchange Manual
  • Fema Notifications
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • RBI Notifications
  • Act
  • Rules
  • Regulations
  • Master Circulars
  • RBI Circulars
  • PMLA Notifications
  • Depository Scheme
  • Press Note
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Public Notices
  • Trade Notice
  • FTDR Amendment 2010
  • MISC
  • State Acts
  • Notifications
  • Instructions
  • Act 2005
  • Rules 2006
  • DGEP
  • State Policy
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • VAT Cases
  • Deputation Posts
  • Service News
  • The Insider
  • Transfer
  • Promotion
  • Recruitment Rules
  • Transfer Policy
  • Training Circulars
  • Service Cases
  • MISC
  • Pay Commission
  • Cadre Review
  • Budget Circular
  • Union Budgets
  • Economic Surveys
  • Budget Speeches
  • Finance Acts
  • Finance Bill
  • TRU - D. O. Letter
  • A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2015 Taxindiaonline.com Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved. | Powered by 4th Dimension