News Update

IAS Association condemns attack on Delhi Chief Secretary; demands immediate actionICAI removes name of O P Tulsyan from register of Members for five years in compliance with Allahabad HC orderST - Supreme Court agrees with Larger Bench CESTAT decision in Bhayana Builders - Revenue appeals dismissedCabinet clears bills on illicit deposit & chit funds regulations (See 'TIOLCorplaws')Cabinet nod for Tribunal on river disputeCabinet nod for bus bay near Indian Defence UniversityCabinet nod for coal mining methodologyCabinet okays Indo-Moroccan railway pactFive IRS officers appointed as CESTAT Members - Sanjiv Srivastava (Mumbai) + P Anjani Kr (Mumbai) + P Venkata Subba Rao (Hyderabad) + Bijay Kr (Delhi) + C L Mahar (Delhi)CBDT issues transfer order of four CITsI-T - Incriminating evidences obtained prior to date of search, cannot be roped in to make additions in case of unabated assessments: ITATPNB scam should pave road for financial transparencyBurdensome registration requirement under GST law be done away withST – World Bank and International Finance Corporation are part of United Nations, therefore, there is no need to resort to definition of International Organization for extending benefit of notification 16/2002-ST: CESTATAnti Profiteering Application - An analysisCX - Merely on basis of statement given by one employee to police that raw materials worth Rs.2 crore were destroyed in fire, same cannot be taken as gospel truth: CESTATGovt keen to make agri schemes 'income-centric' rather than 'production-centric': MinisterKolkata DRI seizes 12.4 kg elephant tusk being smuggled from Assam to NepalDigital India successing becoz of people's pull: PMFish eats plastic & humans eat fish - serious health hazard: MinisterI-T - When assessee was only a licensee, not having exclusive rights over a property, vide unregistered document, it cannot claim to be owner of property for purpose of Sec 22: HCRailways relaxes upper age limit for Group C postsNo GST is leviable on goods sold/transferred while remaining in Customs bonded warehouseLeviability of IGST and as well as Compensation cess under Customs ActAG expresses concern over CBEC cases being dismissed by SC on ground of delayTime to shift focus from acronyms to gaps in performanceGST - Industry reports cumbersome procedures & high cost of compliance
 
Service Tax - mandatory e-payment of Service Tax for major assessees - Board keeps it a top secret

TIOL-DDT 431
21 08 2006
Monday

It was just a month ago that DDT reported about EASIEST-Electronic Accounting System in Central Excise & Service Tax  (TIOL-DDT 415 27 07 2006), CBEC’s new initiative of allowing the assessees to pay Service Tax and excise duty electronically. The Board had clarified that

E-payment of Central Excise and Service Tax is an additional mode of payment in addition to the conventional methods offered by the banks to their customers.

It is essentially an arrangement between the customers [service tax payers] and the bank.

But now the DGST has issued a D.O letter that the Board has decided that with effect from 1st October, 2006, payment of service tax electronically shall be mandatory for those persons who are required to pay services tax and paid more than Rs.50 lakhs in the preceding Financial year or paid more than Rs.50 lakhs during the current financial year.

If the e payment is essentially an arrangement between the assessee and the bank, how can DGST make it mandatory? And can mandate be made by a DO letter from the DGST?

As per Rule 6(2), of the Service Tax Rules,

The assessee shall deposit the service tax liable to be paid by him with the bank designated by the Central Board of Excise and Customs for this purpose in Form TR-6 or in any other manner prescribed by the Central Board of Excise and Customs.

So the manner of payment of tax has to be prescribed by the Board and not communicated by the DGST in private letters.

The DG’s letter further wants the Chief Commissioners to inform the officers and the assessees of this mandatory requirement.

If an assessee asks the Chief Commissioner as where the mandate is, what would be the reply? The DGST’s DO letter?

If the Board wants to make e-payment mandatory, why can’t it issue a notification publicly instead of making the DGST write DO letters? Or is the DGST an independent authority that it decides for the Board?

There are certain problems associated with e-payment. Service Tax is to be paid by 5th of the month. Now what will happen if the assessee’s computer/net or the Bank’s system is down on that day? They have to pay interest for delayed payment. Now a cheque can be presented to the bank on 5th and this cheque comes for collection after two days. So the assessee gets a grace period of two days, but by e-payment, he should have the requisite balance in the account in that particular bank on the date of payment. This is certainly not a facility as the DGST calls it.

The DGST’s letter reads as;

D.O.F.NO: V/DGST/30-Misc-27/e-payment/2006

Dated: 6th/7 July 2006

S.S.RENJHEN

DIRECTOR GENERAL

Subject: Mandatory payment of service tax electronically for major assessees – Reg.

My dear

Considering that the payment and collection of taxes electronically is admittedly an efficient and cost effective way of collection of taxes, the Board has decided that with effect from 1st October, 2006, payment of service tax electronically shall be mandatory for those persons who are required to pay services tax and paid more than Rs.50 lakhs in the preceding Financial year or paid more than Rs.50 lakhs during the current financial year.

2. At present 23 nominated banks are providing the facility of a payment of taxes and 5 more banks have already committed to extend this facility shortly.

3. The officers of the field formations and assessees under your charge may be suitably informed of this mandatory requirement. Please ensure that the proposed facility is implemented smoothy. The Commissioners may also be advised to encourage other assessee, who do not fall within this category, to pay the service tax electronically.

4. The Principal Chief Controller of Accounts has been requested by the Board to coordinate with the field formations and sort out any specific local issues arising due to the implementation of the said proposal.

5. If there are any suggestions or any action needs to be taken at the Board’s level, the same may please be communicated to this Directorate within 15 days.

With regards,
Yours sincerely,
(G.S.RENJHEN)

 Broad Criteria for Selection of cases for scrutiny

The CBDT has announced that Cases are selected for scrutiny based on risk-analysis conducted through computer- assisted programme and also manually with reference to broad parameters decided every year for the entire tax-payer population, inter-alia, considering factors like gross income, deductions and exemptions claimed, legal issues involved in litigation, quantum and nature of specific transactions, status of assessees, etc.

TENDER FOR APPOINTMENT OF A SYSTEMS INTEGRATOR in Income tax opens today.

The Income tax department has invited tenders for Appointment of a Systems Integrator for providing a turnkey solution towards Supply, Installation, Integration, Commissioning, Management & Maintenance of Servers, Storage, Security and other components and Facilities Management Services for the Department. Obviously this is a huge contract. The security deposit is Rs. Three Crores and the Benchmark Suite and Data Set is a whopping non refundable Rs. 2 lakhs. The application form costs Rs. 5000/-

The  Schedule of Date and Time

i) Sale of tender document, Release of Benchmark Suite and Data Set

21.08.06 to 31.08.06

ii) Last date for submission of written queries for clarifications on Tender Document

06.09.06

iii) Pre-Bid Conference

12.09.06

iv) Last time and date for submission of bids

on or before 1300 Hrs on 16.10.06

v) Time and Date of opening of letters of Pre-qualification and Technical Bids

1500 Hrs on 16.10.06

If you are interested, please contact, Directorate of Income Tax (Systems), CIT(Systems)–IV, ARA Centre, E-2, Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi –110055

“There’s no special red-carpet tax loophole for the stars, whether you’re popping the popcorn, sitting in the audience or starring on the big screen, you need to respect the law and pay your taxes.” - IRS (the US version of our Income Tax) Commissioner Mark Everson

Until tomorrow with more DDT

Have a nice day.

Mail your comments to vijaywrite@taxindiaonline.com


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Khuda jab Hushna Deta hai

Earlier Mr. Singh was issuing letters creating problems, impacts of which SCNs are still received by many assessees, evan after a year, like after shokes.

Now Mr. G.S.RENJHEN, has issued a letter for mandatory.

Dear Sir, it seems that neither Mr. Singh had any problem, nor Mr. Renjhen has any problem. But problem is lying in the post of DGST. In other words, somebody has said truely that, KHUDA JAB HUSHNA DETA HAI TO NAZAKAT AA HI JATI HAI.

just on lighter side..

Chauhan Anand

Posted by Anand Chauhan