News Update

Cus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
ST - Revenue is not permitted to take a new stand for deciding appeal in its favour: CESTAT

 

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JAN 14, 2019: THIS is a Revenue appeal against the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Service Tax-I, Mumbai.

The facts are that the respondent is registered with Service Tax Department for providing taxable service under the category of "Port Services".

During CERA audit, it was observed that the respondent had entered into agreement with M/s. ONGC, permitting it to lay pipelines for carrying within the Port Trust limit on land and sea. The pipelines are buried under the land and concealed within the Port Trust limits. In consideration for allowing ONGC to lay sub-marine pipelines through the Port Trust limits, the respondent was paid compensation.

Contending that the compensation received by the respondent from ONGC is taxable under the category of Port Services, demand notice was issued.

However, the proceedings were dropped by the adjudicating authority.

Revenue has assailed this order on the ground that the services should appropriately be classifiable under the taxable category of "Renting of Immovable Property" service.

The Bench considered the submissions and observed -

+ Show cause notice was issued to the respondent, seeking for confirmation of the service tax demand under Port Services.

+ For the first time, Revenue through this present appeal has raised a new ground regarding classification of service under the taxable entry of Renting of Immovable Property Service.

+ Since classification under such service was never the subject matter of dispute before the lower authority and no specific show cause notice was issued to the respondent, alleging classification under such service, the Revenue is not permitted to take such new stand for deciding the appeal in its favour.

Concluding that there is no merit in the appeal filed by the Revenue, the same was dismissed.

(See 2019-TIOL-146-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.