SIGN IN SUBSCRIBE

News Update

Cus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
I-T - If royalty and sponsorship fee received, are incidental income earned out of non-business activity and is used for charitable purpose, is not taxable income : ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, JAN 07, 2019: THE ISSUE IS - Whether since royalty and sponsorship fee received, are incidental income raised from organizing the sports activity, which is not a regular business activity and is used for charitable purpose, is not taxable income of registered society. YES IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case

The assessee society, registered u/s 12A of the Act filed return for relevant AY, claiming exemption u/s 11 of Act. During assessment, the AO observed that the assessee had shown royalty income of Rs 2,45,000/- and sponsorship fee of Rs. 12,75,000/-. He also observed that these amounts were not been received from the members; therefore, it was in the nature of business receipts. The AO observed that the end use of business profit for charitable purpose was of no relevance due to amendment in Section 2(15) and the payer had also deducted TDS, since the main activity of the assessee falls under the category of general public utility, therefore, the first proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act was invoked and receipt on account of royalty and sponsorship fee was stated as business income of the assessee within the meaning of first proviso to Section 2 (15) of the Act. The addition was made accordingly. The CIT(A) allowed the appeal of the assessee. The revenue filed appeal before the Tribunal.

Tribunal held that,

++ the CIT (A) has done good reasoned order which needs no interference. The findings reached by the CIT(A) were that "It is evident that the assessee is not involved in any business activity as there is no apparent motive to earn profit. The royalty and sponsorship fees which are received are incidental for the fulfillment of the objectives of the assessee. The receipts are not being used as business receipts in order to be utilised as profit to any person but instead is used to promote the sport of wrestling. Though the assessee has objectives of general public utility, considering the activities and the objects of the federation as also going by the case laws quoted above, the proviso to Section 2(15) shall not apply to the assessee. The addition made on account of royalty and sponsorship fees may therefore be deleted.";

++ assessee has received royalty and sponsorship fee towards organizing of the sports activity it is not a regular business activity of the society which has been spent for the object of the Society. The CIT(A) has given cogent reasoning for holding that provision to section 2(15) would not apply in the facts of the present case, against which there is nothing on record from the side of the Revenue. In respect of the other issue the assessee has complied the procedures laid down by the Government of India for organizing the sports aboard. Accordingly, the appeal of the Revenue deserves to fail.

(See 2019-TIOL-50-ITAT-DEL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

TIOL Tube
Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.

TOP NEWS

AR not Afar by SK Rahman

VISION 360



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.

TII LATEST

TIOLCORPLAWS LATEST