SIGN IN SUBSCRIBE

News Update

US Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha ElectionsGST - Once Appellate Authority comes to the conclusion that SCN was issued by an officer who was not competent; reply was also considered by an incompetent authority and the Competent Authority had not applied its independent mind, Appellate Authority could not have assumed original jurisdiction and proceeded further with the matter: HC7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farI-T - Initial burden of proof rested on assessee to substantiate his claim of having incurred expenditure on improvement of property: ITATTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresI-T - Agricultural income can be treated by ITO as undisclosed income in absence of any substantial / corroborative material to prove same: ITATCanada arrests three persons in alleged killing of Sikh separatistI-T - Income from sale of property has to be classified & characterised only in manner of computation as per section 45(2): ITATCus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political events
 
I-T - Assumption of jurisdiction u/s 147 is void ab-initio if there is non-application of mind in recording reasons & there is lack of link between formation of belief by AO and tangible materials : ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, NOV 28, 2018: THE ISSUE IS - Whether assumption of jurisdiction u/s 147 is void ab-initio if there is non-application of mind by the AO in recording reasons and there is lack of link between formation of belief by the AO and the tangible materials - YES IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case

The assessee company engaged in the business of trading of diamond jewellery, had filed its return of income for relevant AY. Subsequently, on the basis of information received from the Investigation Wind of the Income Tax Department that the assessee had received share application money/share premium amounting to Rs.6,00,00,000/- from different entry providing companies in financial year 2010-11, the AO reopened the assessment by issue of notice u/s 148 of the Act. During the assessment proceedings, the AO observed that 15 companies had invested in the share capital/share premium of assessee company. He noted that all the 15 companies were paper companies who had no business activities and were engaged in providing accommodation entry. The AO asked the assessee to explain that why the share capital and share premium received to the tune of Rs.6,00,00,000/- be not treated as unexplained cash credit within the meaning of section 68 of the Act. The assessee, submitted reply. However, the AO was not satisfied with the explanation given by the assessee and made addition of Rs. 6,00,00,000/- u/s 68 of the Act. On appeal, CIT(A) upheld the order of AO.

Tribunal held that,

++ Delhi High Court in the case of RMG Polyvinyl (I) Ltd following the above decision has held that where information was received from Investigation Wind that assessee was beneficiary of accommodation entries but not further enquiry was undertaken by the Assessing Officer, said information could not be said to be tangible material per se and, thus, reassessment on said basis was not justified;

++ since in the instant case none of the companies from whom the assessee company has received share capital/share premium are mentioned in the statement of Shri Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal, therefore, it is a clear case of no independent application of mind by the AO to the tangible material and the reasons failed to demonstrate live link between tangible material and formation of reasons to believe that income has escaped assessment. The satisfaction recorded by the AO is at best a reproduction of the conclusion of the investigation wing report and is a borrowed satisfaction. Since the reasons do not demonstrate the live link between the tangible material and formation of reasons to believe that income has escaped assessment, therefore, it was hold that the initiation of re-assessment proceedings by the Assessing Officer merely on the basis of information received from the Investigation Wing and without any independent application of mind is void ab-initio. Therefore, it was decided to set-aside the order of the CIT(A) and the grounds challenging the validity of the re-assessment proceedings were allowed. Since the assessee succeeds on the legal ground, the other grounds are not being adjudicated being academic in nature. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.

(See 2018-TIOL-2260-ITAT-DEL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

TIOL Tube
Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.

TOP NEWS

AR not Afar by SK Rahman

VISION 360



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.

TII LATEST

TIOLCORPLAWS LATEST