News Update

Cus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveysST - Since Department itself admits that service carried out by appellant is that of 'Mining Services' w.e.f. 01.06.2007, thus demand for earlier period has been made only to fasten excess Service Tax demand on appellant which cannot sustain: CESTATICG rescues fisherman with head injury onboard IFB St. Francis off the Gujarat coastCX - When physical stock verification carried out by Officers was not fool proof and there were anomalies, benefit of doubt should be extended to assessee, duty demand confirmed on alleged clandestine removal is not sustainable: CESTAT
 
I-T - Approval from STPI without having same ratified by Board of approval is sufficient to claim deduction u/s 10B : ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

AHMEDABAD, OCT 30, 2018: THE ISSUE IS - Whether the approval from STPI without having the same ratified by the Board of approval is sufficient to claim the deduction u/s 10B of the Act - YES IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case

The assessee, a partnership firm and 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) registered under Software Technology Parks of India (STPI), had filed return for relevant AY, claiming deduction u/s 10B of the Act. During the assessment proceedings, AO observed that the STPI unit of the assessee was not approved by the Board of Approvals as required u/s 10B of the Act. Accordingly, the AO sought an explanation from the assessee. The assessee submitted reply with which AO was not satisfied and disallowed the exemption claimed by it u/s 10B of the Act. On appeal, CIT(A) allowed exemption u/s 10B of the Act.

Tribunal held that,

++ ITAT, Pune Bench in the case of Cat Lab Pvt. Ltd in the identical facts and circumstance held that there is no need to take separate approval from the BOA for claiming the deduction u/s 10B of the Act. The ITAT Ahmedabad Bench has also decided the similar issue in favour of the assessee in the case of Quality BPO Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT for AY 2008-09 after considering the judgment of Delhi High Court in the case of Regency Creation Ltd. It was noted that the CIT(A) in the own case of the assessee for the AY 2009-10 allowed the exemption u/s 10B of the Act after due verification. Against the order of CIT(A) for Asst. Year 2009-10, the Revenue has not preferred any appeal which implies that the order of the CIT(A) has reached to its finality. After having regard to the facts in totality, it was held that the assessee is eligible for exemption u/s 10B of the Act as the same was allowed by the AO in other years as well as by the CIT(A). In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed.

(See 2018-TIOL-1975-ITAT-AHM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.