News Update

Israel shuts down Al Jazeera; seizes broadcast equipmentIndia to wait for Canadian Police inputs on arrest of men accused of killing Sikh separatist: JaishankarLabour Party candidate Sadiq Khan wins record third term as London MayorArmy convoy ambushed in Poonch sectorDeadly floods evict 70K Brazilians out of homes; 57 killed so farGovt scraps ban on export of onionFormer Delhi Congress chief Arvinder Singh Lovely joins BJP with three moreUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha Elections7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implication
 
I-T - One time licence fee paid for setting up of retail outlet, before commencement of business, is to be capitalized; it is not revenue expenditure: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

VIZAG, OCT 26, 2018: THE Issue is - Whether one time licence fees paid for setting up of a retail outlet, and that too before commencement of business, is to be capitalized and cannot be claimed as revenue expenditure. YES IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case:

The assessee is an individual, owning a rice mill and also carrying on the business of retail outlet of petrol bunk. During the year under consideration, the assessee claimed a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- towards licence fee which was disallowed by AO by holding the same as capital expenditure. It is observed by the AO from the details that the assessee had got a letter of intent for Retail outlet of Reliance petrol which was agreed, accepted and signed by the assessee and paid the sum of Rs.3,00,000/- towards signing fee. Since this amount was paid in the financial year 2004-05 but not during the current financial year of 2005-06, the AO held that the expenditure was neither incurred nor accrued in the concerned assessment year, and hence the same was not allowable as revenue expenditure in the year under consideration. The AO also observed that the expenditure was incurred for the purpose of setting up of Retail outlet, therefore, the expenditure was capital in nature. On appeal, the CIT(A) confirmed the order of AO.

Tribunal held that,

++ the assessee is following the mercantile system of accounting and the assessee has paid the sum of Rs.3 lakhs as a signing fee for the training of the dealers and its staff and supervision and coordination of the construction of the retail outlet. The payment was made to the Reliance Industries in A.Y 2005-06 and the expenditure is related to the setting up of the retail outlet incurred before commencement of the business. When queried, the assessee's counsel submitted that the retail outlet of the Reliance unit was commissioned from Oct 01, 2005, whereas the expenditure was incurred on Aug 07, 2004 and the relevant assessment year was 2005-06, but not the year under consideration. Since the unit was commissioned on Oct 01, 2005 and the expenditure was incurred during the construction period before commencement of the business, the said expenditure cannot be related to the expenditure of the relevant assessment year;

++ the assessee's counsel did not provide details with regard to the dates of training given by the Reliance Industries to dealers and the staff. Similarly, no break up of the expenses incurred for the training & construction related activities were submitted. The signing fee was one time payment which was related to the setting up of construction of Reliance petrol pump unit and the expenditure was incurred prior to the commencement of the business, therefore, the contention of assessee that the expenditure be treated as revenue expenditure for the year under consideration, cannot be accepted. Since the expenditure was incurred before the commencement of business, the expenditure required to be capitalized or the same should be amortized as per section 35D.

(See 2018-TIOL-1931-ITAT-VIZAG)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.