News Update

India-Ghana Joint Trade Committee meeting held in AccraGhana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsGST - Record does not reflect that any opportunity was given to petitioner to clarify its reply or furnish further documents/details - In such scenario, proper officer could not have formed an opinion - Matter remitted: HCED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in HaryanaGST - Mapping of PAN number with GST number - No fault of petitioner - Respondent authorities directed to activate GST number within two weeks: HCGST - Circular 183/2022 - Petitioner to prove his case that he had received the supply and paid the tax to the supplier/dealer - Matter remitted: HCGST -Petitioner to produce all documents as required under summons -Petitioner to be heard by respondent and a decision to be taken, first on the preliminary issue raised with regard to applicability of CGST/SGST: HCGST - s.73 - Extension of time limit for issuance of order - Notifications 13/2022-CT and 09/2023-CT are not ultra vires s.168A of the Act, 2017: HCSun releases two solar storms - Earth has come in its wayRequisite Checks for Appeals - RespondentInheritance Tax row - A golden opportunity to end 32-years long Policy Paralysis on DTCThe Heat is on: Preserving Earth's Climate in the Face of Global WarmingVAT - Timeline for frefund must be followed mandatorily while recovering dues under Delhi VAT Act: SCIndia, Australia to work closely for collaborative projectsCX - All the information was available to department in 2003 itself, therefore, SCN issued four years after gathering information is not sustainable and is highly barred by limitation: HCPowerful voices of amazing women leaders resonated at UN Hqs75 International visitors from 23 countries arrive to watch world's largest elections unfoldCentre asks States to improve organ donation frequencyCus - Revenue involved in the appeal filed by Commissioner is far below the threshold monetary limit fixed by the CBEC, therefore, department cannot proceed with this appeal - Appeal stands disposed of: HCAdani Port to develop port in PhilippinesUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awarded
 
CX - Rule 6 of CCR cannot be invoked to demand CENVAT in respect of motors, generator, engine, remnant oil arising during breaking up of ship by alleging that sale of the same is trading activity: CESTAT

 

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, AUG 25, 2018: IN this appeal, the facts are that the respondents (ship breaking company) were availing credit of tax paid on input services and the same was utilised for discharge of CE duty on dutiable goods manufactured.

Revenue alleged that the sale of motors, generator, engine, remnant oil etc. amounted to trading activity and, therefore, the respondent ought to have reversed CENVAT credit in terms of rule 6 of the CCR

The respondents argued that the items viz. motors, generator, engine, remnant oil etc. are not purchased by them but recovered during the breaking up of the ship and, therefore, it cannot be said that they are engaged in trading activity.

The Commissioner(A) accepted their contention and aggrieved Revenue took their case to the CESTAT.

The Bench considered the submissions and observed -

"3. It is seen that what the appellants are purchasing is a ship for the purpose of breaking. The appellants are breaking the ship and as a result certain items are recovered. The scrap so generated is sold by appellants on payment of central excise duty. Other items generated are sold by them as it is. The items in respect of which demands for revenue under Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules have been made are not purchased by appellants but are part of the ship when it is imported. In this regard, the activity of the appellants cannot be considered as trading activity."

The Single Member Bench, therefore, held that the notice could not be sustained.

Nonetheless, while concluding the order, the Bench remarked that the "appeal was allowed".

We had while reporting the order - 2017-TIOL-3608-CESTAT-MUM pointed out that this was not what it ought to be.

Thankfully, the error has been rectified by issuance of a corrigendum which reads - in Para 4, the words:

"In view of the above, notice cannot be sustained and the appeal is consequently allowed."

be read as

"In view of the above, notice cannot be sustained and the appeal is consequently dismissed".

In passing:

All good things must come to an end - an old Proverb.

(See 2018-TIOL-2614-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.