News Update

Tax Refund Conundrum - Odyssey of Legal MisstepsI-T- AO not barred from issuing more than one SCN; Fresh SCN seeking information is not without jurisdiction, more so where HC itself directed re-doing of assessment: HCMurthy launches Capacity Building on Design and Entrepreneurship programCash, liquor & drugs worth Rs 110 Cr seized from Jharkhand ahead of pollsI-T- Appeal before CIT(A) (NFAC) is rightly dismissed where it has been delayed by over one year without just & reasonable cause: ITATPoll-induced stress: 2 Bihar officials die of heart attack at polling boothsSixth Edition of Commandants' Conclave held in PuneSome Gujarat villages keep away from polls over unfulfilled demands from governmentI-T- Re-assessment unsustainable, where based on third party statements & not corroborated by incriminating evidence: ITATRoof-hugging inflation nudges Argentina to print first lot of 10,000 notes of pesoI-T- Re-assessment invalidated where triggerred by change of opinion, on account of being based on material already available during original assessment: ITATInvestigation finds presence of ‘boys club’ strands of culture at American bank regulatorST - Civil work for construction of tower in port area, is exempt from tax as per Notfn No 25/2007-ST; constructing draining pipes for municipal corporation is not commercial activity & so no Service Tax is payable thereon: CESTATUS alleges Russia shipping oil to North Korea more than UN-fixed quotaCus - That appellants were aware of dutiable nature of Gold found from baggage & of procedure for declaration at Customs, reveals intent to smuggle said Gold without payment of tax - conditions for valid import of Gold not satisfied either; absolute confiscation upheld: CESTATUS cancels licence to some firms found exporting materials to HuaweiCX - Excise duty is determines based on how goods are cleared - What happens to goods post their removal, is not manufacturer's lookout, unless manufacturer is involved in fraud or wilful mis-declaration: CESTATRenewables accounted for 30% of global power supply in 2023: StudyCX - Manufacturer of Single Sugar Phosphate (SSP) meant for agricultural use, cannot be held liable for use of SSP for industrial purposes, by a tertiary purchaser of SSP: CESTATCLAT 2024 exams to be held on Dec 1ST - Since the demand itself is not sustainable, question of demanding interest and imposing penalty does not arise: CESTAT
 
I-T - Exemption u/s 10(23C)(iv) can be claimed only to the extent of actual income and not for accumulated income: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

CHANDIGARH, AUG 18, 2018: THE ISSUE IS - Whether charitable trust can claim exemption u/s 10(23C)(iv) only to the extent of actual income and not for accumulation of income exceeding the actual amount. YES IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case

The assessee charitable trust, deriving income from printing and publication of newspaper, had filed return for the relevant AY, claiming exemption u/s 10(23C (iv) of the Act and further declaring loss of Rs. 9,70,90,059/-. During assessment proceedings, the AO found that the assessee trust had actually shown surplus income of Rs. 24,40,19,449/- but had still claimed loss to be carried forward by claiming exemption of higher amount as against the total income. The AO held that the exemption u/s 10(23C)(iv) of the Act could not be more than the income earned by the assessee and, therefore, restricted the same to the surplus earned by the assessee as per its income & expenditure account amounting to Rs. 24,40,19,449/- and denied the loss claimed by the assessee of Rs. 9,70,90,059/-. But on appeal, CIT(A) passed order in favour of assessee holding that the assessee was eligible for carry forward of losses.

Tribunal held that,

++ the loss claimed to be carried forward by the assessee, amounting to Rs. 9.7 crores, has arisen on account of the claim of assessee towards accumulation of income in excess of that actually earned by it. It was noted that Revenue is correct in holding that the section allows exemption of the entire income even if the same remains unutilized or is accumulated, to the extent of 15% of the income of the assessee. The section is clear, simple and unambiguous leaving no scope for any other interpretation. Thus it is the actual accumulation made by the assessee which to be seen while determining its eligibility for claiming exemption and there is no provision for allowing deduction on account of accumulation exceeding the actual accumulation made by the assessee;

++ since as per the facts of the present case the assessee has claimed deduction of accumulation in excess of the actual amount,the same was held as not allowable to the assessee. The loss claimed to be carried forward by the assessee on account of the same is therefore also disallowed. Thus it was held that the assessee is not entitled to claim carry forward of loss to the extent of Rs.9,70,90,059/- and set aside the order of the CIT(A). In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed.

(See 2018-TIOL-1308-ITAT-CHD)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.