News Update

Elected Women of PRIs to Participate in CPD57 in New YorkIndia, New Zealand to have deeper collaboration in Pharma, Agriculture and Food ProcessingIndia’s manufacturing PMI marginally slides to 58.8 in April monthDefence Secretary & Secretary General of MoD, Indonesia to co-chair 7th Joint Committee meetingAbove 7000 Yoga enthusiasts practised Common Yoga Protocol in SuratManeka Gandhi declares assets worth Rs 97 Cr and files nomination papers from SultanpurGlobal Debt & Fiscal Silhouette rising! Do Elections contribute to fiscal slippages?ISRO study reveals possibility of water ice in polar cratersGST - Statutory requirement to carry the necessary documents should not be made redundant - Mistake committed by appellant is not extending e-way bill after the expiry, despite such liberty being granted under the Rules attracts penalty: HCBiden says migration has been good for US economyGST - Tax paid under wrong head of IGST instead of CGST/SGST - 'Relevant Date' for refund would be the date when tax is paid under the correct head: HCUS says NO to Rafah operation unless humanitarian plan is in place + Colombia snaps off ties with IsraelGST - Petitioner was given no opportunity to object to retrospective cancellation of registration - Order is also bereft of any details: HCMay Day protests in Paris & Istanbul; hundreds arrestedGST - Proper officer should have at least considered the reply on merits before forming an opinion - Ex facie, proper officer has not applied his mind: HCSaudi fitness instructor jailed for social media post - Amnesty International seeks releaseGST - A Rs.17.90 crores demand confirmed on Kendriya Bhandar by observing that reply is insufficient - Non-application of mind is clearly written all over the order: HCDelhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraftGST - Neither the SCN nor the order spell the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, they are set aside: HCIndia successfully tests SMART anti-submarine missile-assisted torpedo systemKiller heatwave kills hundreds of thousands of fish in Southern VietnamHong Kong struck by close to 1000 lightningColumbia Univ campus turns into ‘American Gaza’ - Pro-Palestinian students & counter-protesters clashMissile-Assisted Release of Torpedo system successfully flight-tested by DRDO
 
I-T - If consideration of slump sale is to be paid in parts in different AYs, capital gains are to be taxed in the year in which agreement is executed: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, AUG 07, 2018: THE ISSUE IS - Whether if sale consideration of slum sale is to be received in two or more parts in different AYs, the capital gains should be computed on entire sale consideration in the relevant year in which agreement is executed. YES IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case

The assessee company engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling home appliances, had through a slump sale agreement with M/s. Preethi Kitchen Appliances Pvt. Ltd, transferred its division at Thazhambur Road, Navalur Village & Post, Kancheepuram along with plant & machinery, furniture & fixtures, computers, inventories etc. Though the total consideration agreed was Rs 18,31,00,000/-, what was received during the relevant year was only Rs 16,02,00,000/- and the balance sum of Rs. 2,29,00,000/- was received in subsequent FY. Further, assessee had computed capital gains on the sum of Rs.16,02,00,000/- in relevant year and the balance sum of Rs 2,29,00,000/- was offered in the subsequent AY. During assessment, the AO held the date of actual receipt of consideration was irrelevant since the slump sale agreement was entered in relevant year so the capital gains should be computed on one go on entire sale consideration in relevant year only. On appeal, CIT(A) upheld the order of AO.

On appeal, Tribunal held that,

++ what is chargeable to tax is profits or gains arising from the slump sale. Profits or gains arising from a slump sale can be correctly computed only if the total consideration arising to an assessee on account of sale is reckoned. There is no provision which allows the assessee to segregate the consideration as per slump sale agreement in accordance with the year of receipt. Amount of sale consideration was transferred in escrow account. Release of the amount lying in the escrow account is subject to issue of a letter from seller and purchaser to the escrow agent. No doubt, release of the escrow amount, is dependent on satisfaction of various responsibilities undertaken by the assessee in relation to the slump sale. This by itself would not be a reason to hold that consideration for the slump sale was not Rs.18,31,00,000/-. Consideration is clearly mentioned in the slump sale agreement as Rs.18,31,00,000/-. Segregating such consideration to two parts, for computing capital gains in not correct. The ground raised by assessee stands dismissed.

(See 2018-TIOL-1226-ITAT-MAD)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.