SIGN IN SUBSCRIBE

News Update

Bengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearElected Women of PRIs to Participate in CPD57 in New YorkIndia, New Zealand to have deeper collaboration in Pharma, Agriculture and Food ProcessingIndia’s manufacturing PMI marginally slides to 58.8 in April monthDefence Secretary & Secretary General of MoD, Indonesia to co-chair 7th Joint Committee meetingAbove 7000 Yoga enthusiasts practised Common Yoga Protocol in SuratManeka Gandhi declares assets worth Rs 97 Cr and files nomination papers from SultanpurGlobal Debt & Fiscal Silhouette rising! Do Elections contribute to fiscal slippages?ISRO study reveals possibility of water ice in polar cratersBiden says migration has been good for US economyGST - Tax paid under wrong head of IGST instead of CGST/SGST - 'Relevant Date' for refund would be the date when tax is paid under the correct head: HCUS says NO to Rafah operation unless humanitarian plan is in place + Colombia snaps off ties with IsraelGST - Petitioner was given no opportunity to object to retrospective cancellation of registration - Order is also bereft of any details: HCMay Day protests in Paris & Istanbul; hundreds arrestedGST - A Rs.17.90 crores demand confirmed on Kendriya Bhandar by observing that reply is insufficient - Non-application of mind is clearly written all over the order: HCDelhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraft
 
I-T - When company with poor financial performance is able to issues shares at premium and AO does not investigate nature and justification of premium then it is a valid case to pass order u/s 263: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JULY 27, 2018: THE ISSUE IS - Whether when company with nil EPS issues shares at premium and AO does not investigate nature and justification of the premium then it is a valid case to pass order u/s 263 of Act. YES IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case

The assessee company had filed return for relevant AY. The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) of Act. During relevant year assessee company raised funds through issue of shares at premium. The Percentage of share holding by each shareholder prior to issue of share premium on the one hand and subsequent to the event on the other hand had remained unchanged. The CIT noted that issue of share capital was analyzed by AO, investigated the source of the amount received but not at all dwelve into the nature of the receipts. Thereafter, the CIT passed order u/s 263 of the Act, thereby holding that the order passed by the AO was erroneous and was prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. The premium amount received having no justification should have been charged to tax as income of assessee or should have been treated unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Act. The assessment order was set aside with the direction to the AO to frame the assessment afresh. Aggrieved assessee filed appeal before the Tribunal.

Tribunal held that,

++ the records revealed that during the course of original assessment, AO had looked into the source of share capital but did not at all analyze the fact of 'Premium' and the 'Nature of that premium'. The book value of assessee company was negative, therefore prima facie there was no rationale for receipts of premium on issue of fresh shares. Therefore a show cause notice u/s 263 of the I.T. Act was issued proposing to revise the assessment;

++ the assessee had issued share capital at a premium of Rs. 170 per share and had thus obtained 90 lakh as aggregate amount of premium and in this respect, the issue of share capital was analyzed by the AO while passing the original order of assessment, but the AO had admittedly failed to realize that share premium falls into an altogether different territories. The AO had analyzed the issue of share in terms of Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, but he had totally ignored to look at the entire issue from the angle of 'justification of the premium.'The AO had totally missed the fact that section 68 required 'nature' also to be looked into for establishing genuineness of the transaction. The "nature" of receipt therefore could not have been ignored by AO and on the perusal of records, it reveals that while the AO investigated the source of the amount, thus received and he did not at all dwelve into the nature of the receipts of premium as envisaged in section 68 of I.T. Act. It was also pointed out by CIT that there was no rationale for receipts of huge premium when the EPS of assessee is 'Nil'. Therefore, it was held by CIT that the order of assessment under consideration was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. The CIT had correctly exercised the power u/s 263 of the Act. Resultantly, these ground raised by the assessee stands dismissed.

(See 2018-TIOL-1151-ITAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

TIOL Tube
Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.

TOP NEWS

AR not Afar by SK Rahman

VISION 360



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.

TII LATEST

TIOLCORPLAWS LATEST