News Update

RBI alerts against misuse of banking channels for facilitating illegal forex tradingEC censures Jagan Reddy & Chandrababu Naidu for MCC violationsFrance tells Xi Jinping EU needs protection from China’s cheap importsUK military personnel’s data hackedOxygen valve malfunction delays launch of Boeing’s first crewed spacecraftPulitzer prize goes to Reuters & NYTDutch, Belgian students join Gaza sit-ins by US Univ studentsIndia-Ghana Joint Trade Committee meeting held in AccraGhana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsGST - Record does not reflect that any opportunity was given to petitioner to clarify its reply or furnish further documents/details - In such scenario, proper officer could not have formed an opinion - Matter remitted: HCED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in HaryanaGST - Mapping of PAN number with GST number - No fault of petitioner - Respondent authorities directed to activate GST number within two weeks: HCGST - Circular 183/2022 - Petitioner to prove his case that he had received the supply and paid the tax to the supplier/dealer - Matter remitted: HCGST -Petitioner to produce all documents as required under summons -Petitioner to be heard by respondent and a decision to be taken, first on the preliminary issue raised with regard to applicability of CGST/SGST: HCGST - s.73 - Extension of time limit for issuance of order - Notifications 13/2022-CT and 09/2023-CT are not ultra vires s.168A of the Act, 2017: HCRequisite Checks for Appeals - RespondentInheritance Tax row - A golden opportunity to end 32-years long Policy Paralysis on DTCThe Heat is on: Preserving Earth's Climate in the Face of Global WarmingVAT - Timeline for frefund must be followed mandatorily while recovering dues under Delhi VAT Act: SCIndia, Australia to work closely for collaborative projects
 
I-T - No taxpayer can be prevented from netting off interest received on income tax refund, against interest payable on delayed deposit of tax, same being tax neutral exercise: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JULY 19, 2018: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL IS - Whether a taxpayer cannot be prevented from netting off interest received on income tax refund against interest payable on delayed deposit of tax, as the same does not result in any loss to I-T Department. YES IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case:

The assessee company, engaged in the business of manufacturing & sale of pharmaceutical products, had e-filed its return declaring total income of Rs.252,00,29,460/- as per the normal provisions and a 'book profit' of Rs.305,22,12,660/- as per the provisions of Sec.115JB. The case of assessee was then taken up for scrutiny, wherein the AO noticed that assessee company was in receipt of interest on income tax refunds amounting to Rs.2,64,12,688/- for various assessment years, and it had claimed set off of the same against the interest of Rs.3,67,73,753/- that was paid to the Income tax Department for late payment of tax for various years. However, the claim for set off was declined by AO for the reason that interest paid did not have a nexus with the interest received by assessee. On appeal, the assessee's claim for setting off of interest income was allowed.

Tribunal held that,

++ it is found that the issue that an assessee is well within his right to set off the interest received on the income tax refund against the interest paid on the taxes to the income tax department, is squarely covered by the judgment of the High Court of Bombay in the case of DIT Vs. Bank of America NT & SA [ITA No. 177 of 2012, dated July 03, 2014], wherein it was observed that: "....The Tribunal found that the assessee Bank received interest on refund of taxes paid. It also paid interest on the taxes which were payable. The Assessee sought to set off the interest paid against the interest received and offered the net interest received to tax. Now, the Tribunal has opined that when the exercise carried out by assessee does not result in loss of revenue, there could not be any prohibition for the same...." Therefore, being of the considered view that as the issue involved in the appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of Bombay High Court, and therefore, respectfully following the same, the AO is directed to allow the claim of assessee for setting off the interest on income tax refund of Rs. 2,64,12,688/- against the interest of Rs. 3,67,73,753/- paid to the income tax department on late payment of tax for various years.

(See 2018-TIOL-1095-ITAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.