News Update

Requisite Checks for Appeals - Court FeeI-T - Members of Settlement Commission appointed amongst persons of integrity & outstanding ability & having special knowledge in/experience of direct taxes; unfortunate that SETCOM's orders are challenged without establishing them to be contrary to law or lacking in jurisdiction: HCThe 'taxing' story of Malabar Parota, calories notwithstanding!I-T - Unless a case of bias, fraud or malice is alleged, then Department cannot assail SETCOM's order: HCCentre allows export of 99,150 MT onion to Bangladesh, UAE, Bhutan, Bahrain, Mauritius & LankaI-T- Re-assessment vide Faceless Assessment u/s 144 of I-T Act, is barred by Section 31 of IBC 2016, which is binding upon all creditors of corporate debtor: HCPension Portals of all Pension Disbursing Banks to be integratedI-T- Resolution Plan under IBC, once approved, nullifies any claims pertaining to a period prior to approval of said Plan: HC‘Flash Mob’ drive in London seeks support for PM ModiI-T - Once assessee has produced all supporting documents which includes profit & loss account, balance sheet and copy of ITR of creditors, then identity & creditworthiness is established: ITATTo deliver political message, Pak Sessions judge abducted and then released: KPKI-T - Assessee shall provide monthly figures to arrive at year-end average of deposits received from members, interest paid thereon & investments made in FDs from external funds, for calculating Sec 80P deduction: ITATMaersk to invest USD 600 mn in Nigerian seaport infraI-T - It shall not be necessary to issue authorization u/s 132 separately in name of each person where authorization has been issued mentioning thereon more than one person: ITATChile announces 3-day national mourning after three police officers killedI-T- Since facts have not yet been verified by AO, issue of CSR expenditure can be remanded back for reconsideration: ITATIndian Coast Guard intercepts Pakistani boat with 86 kg drugs worth Rs 600 CroreI-T - Failure to substantiate cash deposits by employer during festival will not automatically lead to additions u/s 68, in absence of any opportunity of hearing: ITATGold watch of richest Titanic pax auctioned for USD 1.46 millionGST - There is no material on record to show as to why the registration is sought to be cancelled retrospectively - Order cannot be sustained: HCIraq is latest to criminalise same-sex marriage with max 15 yrs of jail-termGST - SCN does not put the petitioner to notice that the registration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively, therefore, petitioner did not have any opportunity to object to the same - Order modified: HCUndersea quake of 6.5 magnitude strikes Java; No tsunami alert issuedGST - A taxpayer's registration can be cancelled with retrospective effect only where such consequences are intended and are warranted: HCZelensky says Russia shelling oil facilities to choke supply to EuropeGST - Rule 86A - Single Judge was correct in relegating appellant to his alternate remedy of replying to SCNs and getting matter adjudicated by adjudicating authority: HC20 army men killed in blasts at army base in CambodiaST -Simultaneous filing of refund applications by service provider/KSFE and the service recipients/petitioners for same amount - Applications ought not to be rejected on technical issue when applications filed in time: HC3 Indian women from Gujarat died in mega SUV accident in USST - Court cannot examine the issue, which is only a question of fact and evidence and not of the law - Petition dismissed: HCJNU switches to NET in place of entrance test for PhD admissionsCX - Department ought not to have waited for rebate proceedings to get finalized and ought to have issued SCN within normal period: CESTATGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand noticeCus - As Section 149 prior to its amendment, does not prescribe any time limit, the Board vide Circular 36/2010 cannot impose a time limit so as to decline the request for amendment of shipping bill: CESTAT
 
IT - Revenue can either accept surrender and admission of assessee or estimate income by rejecting books of accounts but cannot choose both: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, JULY 04, 2018: THE ISSUE IS - Whether Revenue can opt only one of the method for computing taxable income, either accepts the surrender and admission of the assessee or estimate the income by rejecting books of accounts but can not opt for both simultaneously. YES IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case

The assessee company, engaged in the business of manufacturing had filed return for relevant AY. A survey u/s 133A was conducted on the assessee. On the basis of survey, it came to knowledge of AO that assessee was indulged in bogus transactions. The assessee admitted the same and surrendered the amount. The assessee also made surrender of Rs. 2.05 crores u/s 41(1) of the Act on account of liabilities that are no longer required to be paid under the Head "Remission of Liabilities" in the case of assessee and group concerns. Further, the assessee during the course of survey made surrender of various other amounts u/s 41(1) of Act. The AO, considered the case on the basis of the seized material. The assessee in order to avoid litigation, agreed for estimating net profit @ 8% of the turnover. The AO noted that assessee did not produced books of account and the vouchers and seized material were not been reconciled. The AO in absence of any satisfactory explanation by assessee, rejected the books of account u/s 145(3) of the Act. The AO made the addition of Rs.4.52 crores to the returned income which was inclusive of the surrender made by the assessee during the course of assessment proceedings. The AO also noted that there was a difference of Rs.1,08,003/- pertaining to the confirmation called for in the case of Graphite India Ltd., which had not been explained. Therefore, further addition of Rs.1,08,003/- was made. On appeal, CIT(A) upheld the order of AO.

Tribunal held that,

++ the AO held that since books of account have not been produced by assessee, therefore, he is not satisfied about correctness and completeness of the accounts of the assessee, therefore, same were rejected. The AO instead of rejecting the books of account of assessee should have computed the income of the assessee based upon the books of account which were produced before him as per explanation of assessee. However, he has not taken any figure from the books of account and accepted the admission of the surrender of Rs.4.52 crores for the purpose of making the addition. The Assessee, therefore, rightly contended that AO cannot go with both the methods for the purpose of making the addition against the assessee. Either the AO should go with the surrender and admission of the assessee or may go to estimate the income of the assessee by referring to the books of account and other material on record. The surrender was on account of unexplained investment in purchase of land and machinery which is different from estimation of profit by rejecting the books of account. The AO did not accept surrender of assessee at the assessment stage and rejected books of account of assessee under section 145(3) of the Act, but, later on, AO did not estimate the income of assessee based on books of account, but accepted the surrender of Rs.4.52 crores so surrendered during the course of survey. The assessee on the other hand, has pleaded that books of account have been produced before AO. Therefore, there is contradiction in the statement of assessee and findings of the AO. The AO also noted in the assessment order that at the time of reconciliation books of account of the assessee may not be ready by that time. These facts, therefore, clearly show that the matter requires reconsideration at the level of the AO because if the AO wanted to rely upon the seized material, he has to compute the income based on the seized material. However, nothing has been done in the matter. Accordingly, it was decided to set aside the orders of the authorities below on the issue of addition of Rs.4.52 crores and restore to AO for fresh determination. The AO shall pass the order afresh in accordance with law by considering the entire evidence on record, books of account to be produced by the assessee along with other details. The AO shall give reasonable, sufficient opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

(See 2018-TIOL-1006-ITAT-DEL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.