News Update

Maneka Gandhi declares assets worth Rs 97 Cr and files nomination papers from SultanpurGlobal Debt & Fiscal Silhouette rising! Do Elections contribute to fiscal slippages?ISRO study reveals possibility of water ice in polar cratersGST - Statutory requirement to carry the necessary documents should not be made redundant - Mistake committed by appellant is not extending e-way bill after the expiry, despite such liberty being granted under the Rules attracts penalty: HCBiden says migration has been good for US economyGST - Tax paid under wrong head of IGST instead of CGST/SGST - 'Relevant Date' for refund would be the date when tax is paid under the correct head: HCUS says NO to Rafah operation unless humanitarian plan is in place + Colombia snaps off ties with IsraelGST - Petitioner was given no opportunity to object to retrospective cancellation of registration - Order is also bereft of any details: HCMay Day protests in Paris & Istanbul; hundreds arrestedGST - Proper officer should have at least considered the reply on merits before forming an opinion - Ex facie, proper officer has not applied his mind: HCSaudi fitness instructor jailed for social media post - Amnesty International seeks releaseGST - A Rs.17.90 crores demand confirmed on Kendriya Bhandar by observing that reply is insufficient - Non-application of mind is clearly written all over the order: HCDelhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraftGST - Neither the SCN nor the order spell the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, they are set aside: HCIndia successfully tests SMART anti-submarine missile-assisted torpedo systemST - Appellant was performing statutory functions as mandated by EPF & MP Act, and the Constitution of India, as per Board's Circular 96/7/2007-ST , services provided under Statutory obligations are not taxable: CESTATKiller heatwave kills hundreds of thousands of fish in Southern VietnamI-T - Scrutiny assessment order cannot be assailed where assessee confuses it with order passed pursuant to invocation of revisionary power u/s 263: HCHong Kong struck by close to 1000 lightningI-T - Assessment order invalidated where passed in rushed manner to avoid being hit by impending end of limitation period: HCColumbia Univ campus turns into ‘American Gaza’ - Pro-Palestinian students & counter-protesters clashI-T - Additions framed on account of bogus purchases merits being restricted to profit element embedded therein, where AO has not doubted sales made out of such purchases: HCIndia to host prestigious 46th Antarctic Treaty Consultative MeetingI-T - Miscellaneous Application before ITAT delayed by 1279 days without any just causes or bona fide; no relief for assessee: HCAdani Port & SEZ secures AAA RatingI-T - Assessee is eligible for deduction u/s 54EC on account of investment made in REC Bonds, provided both investments were made within period of six months as prescribed u/s 54EC: ITATNominations for Padma Awards 2025 beginsI-T - PCIT cannot invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 when there is no case of lack of enquiry or adequate enquiry on part of AO: ITATMissile-Assisted Release of Torpedo system successfully flight-tested by DRDOI-T - If purchases & corresponding sales were duly matched, it cannot be said that same were made out of disclosed sources of income: ITATViksit Bharat @2047: Taxes form the BedrockI-T - Reopening of assessment is invalid as while recording reasons for reopening of assessment, AO has not thoroughly examined materials available in his own record : ITAT
 
I-T - Technical issues faced in filing TDS return online are bona fide reason for delayed filing of TDS returns - penalty not warranted: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JUNE 21, 2018: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE BENCH IS - Whether when assessee deduct the tax at source and pays the same with Revenue within prescribed time but delayed the filing of TDS returns due to genuine technical problem faced while filing return on line then for such a delay penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) can be imposed. NO IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case:

The assessee had filed statement of tax deducted at source in form no. 26Q for FY 2009-10 late beyond the time prescribed in Rule 31A of Income-tax Rules. The AO invoked penal provisions u/s 272A(2)(k) of the Act, as there was a delay in filing of the statement of TDS. The assessee contended before the AO that there was not a single instance of delayed payment of tax after the same was deducted at source at the time of payment to the respective parties. The default in respect of the filing of TDS returns happened because assessee was not fully conversant with E-filing of TDS returns. It was prayed that this difficulties should be considered to be genuine. The AO rejected the contentions of the assessee and observed that assessee had not shown reasonable cause as stipulated u/s. 273B and levied penalty. On appeal, CIT(A) upheld the order of AO.

Tribunal held that,

++ the revenue was initially accepting the TDS return in paper forms which was later on converted into filing in an electronic mode. In this switch over face there were technological glitches as well difficulties which were faced by the taxpayers in filing returns with Revenue. The assessee also claimed to have faced problem in E-filing of TDS returns although it is claimed that taxes were paid in time. The Revenue cannot rebut the same that it got the payment of taxes deducted at source in time. The assessee has also claimed that in subsequent years most of the TDS returns have been E-filed in time. The conduct of the assessee appears to be bona-fide as the assessee was paying taxes in time for the impugned year under consideration while statement of tax deducted at source were filed late as well it has been explained that the taxes have been paid for subsequent years also in time as well TDS returns were also filed in time in majority of the quarters. The assessee has shown bona-fide cause and in the circumstances penalty is not exigible on the assessee. Order was passed for the deletion of the penalty. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.

(See 2018-TIOL-902-ITAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS