News Update

3 Indian women from Gujarat died in mega SUV accident in USJNU switches to NET in place of entrance test for PhD admissionsGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand noticeI-T - Bonafide claim of deduction by assessee which was accepted in first round of proceedings does not tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars, simply because it was disallowed later: ITATIndia-bound oil tanker struck by Houthiā€™s missiles in Red SeaSCO Defence Ministers' Meeting endorses 'One Earth, One Family, One Future'RBI issues draft rules on digital lendingI-T - In order to invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263, twin conditions of error in order and also prejudice to interest of Revenue must be established independently: ITATCRPF senior official served notice of dismissal on charges of sexual harassmentIndian Air Force ushers in Digital Transformation with DigiLocker IntegrationColumbia faculty blames leadership for police action against protestersCX - When process undertaken by assessee does not amount to manufacture, even then CENVAT credit is admissible if such inputs are cleared on payment of duty which would amount to reversal of credit availed: CESTATGoogle to inject USD 3 bn investment in data centre in IndianaCus - The equipments are teaching accessories which enable students in a class to respond to queries and these equipments are used along with ADP machine, same merits classification under CTH 8471 60 29: CESTATUN says clearing Gaza mounds of rubble to take 14 yrsST - When issue is of interpretation, appellant should not be fastened with demand for extended period, the demand confirmed for extended period is set aside: CESTATBlinken says China trying to interfere US Presidential pollsWorld Energy Congress 2024: IREDA CMD highlights need for Innovative Financing Solutions
 
I-T - For claiming deduction u/s 80IA(4), infrastructure development agreement executed by nodal agency of State Govt should be treated to have been entered by State itself: HC

By TIOL News Service

AHMEDABAD, MAY 08, 2018: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE COURT IS - Whether infrastructure development projects undertaken by assessee with nodal agency incorporated by the State Government is entitled for deduction 80IA(4) of the Act. YES IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case:

The assessee company, engaged in implementing infrastructure development projects, had filed return for relevant AY. The assessee had claimed deduction 80IA(4) of the Act. During assessment AO noted that assessee had undertaken road development project, in pursuance of an agreement with Gujarat State Road Development Corporation ('GSRDC'). The Assessee contended that the GSRDC was performing all the functions of the State Government and therefore the concession agreement executed by GSRDC should be treated to have been entered into by the State Government. The AO however did not accept such contention and rejected the assessee's claim of deduction u/s 80IA(4) of the Act. On appeal, CIT(A) granted deduction to assessee. On further appeal, Tribunal upheld the order of CIT(A).

High Court held that,

++ GSRDC was a nodal agency constituted by the State Government for the purpose of executing road development projects through private participation and was a Government agency. The road widening project was cleared by the Government, land for such purpose was allotted by the Government. The concession agreement which GSRDC executed was approved by the Government. It was under the Government Resolution that the assessee would collect toll upon completion of such project. Upon the completion of the project period, the entire infrastructure so developed would vest in the Government. Signatory to the applicant may be GSRDC for all practical purposes and in essence, it was the agreement between the assessee and the State Government. Condition (b) of subsection (4) of section 80IA requires the assessee to have entered into agreement with the Central Government or a State Government or a local authority or any other statutory authority. However, rigid interpretation of this provision as canvassed by the Revenue would only result into the assessees involved in genuine infrastructure development projects for and on behalf of the Government or local authorities would be denied the deduction merely on the ground that the State Government had created a nodal agency for working out the finer details and nittygritty of such infrastructure development. The purpose of creating such nodal agencies as well as the legislative intent of granting deduction to the assessee engaged in developing, maintaining or operating any infrastructure projects for Central or State Government or local or statutory authorities would frustrate.

(See 2018-TIOL-851-HC-AHM-IT)


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: 80 IA 4 to road developer

what will happen to explanation now of contractor vs developer now can it be said that all road contractors are developers?

Posted by PM Maharishi
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.