News Update

US Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha ElectionsGST - Once Appellate Authority comes to the conclusion that SCN was issued by an officer who was not competent; reply was also considered by an incompetent authority and the Competent Authority had not applied its independent mind, Appellate Authority could not have assumed original jurisdiction and proceeded further with the matter: HC7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farI-T - Initial burden of proof rested on assessee to substantiate his claim of having incurred expenditure on improvement of property: ITATTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresI-T - Agricultural income can be treated by ITO as undisclosed income in absence of any substantial / corroborative material to prove same: ITATCanada arrests three persons in alleged killing of Sikh separatistI-T - Income from sale of property has to be classified & characterised only in manner of computation as per section 45(2): ITATCus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political events
 
I-T - A company having both domestic as well as export businesses, is entitled to claim benefit u/s 80HHC: HC

 

By TIOL News Service

ERNAKULAM, MAY 03, 2018: THE ISSUE IS - Whether a company having both domestic as well as export businesses is entitled to claim benefit u/s 80HHC. AND THE VERDICT IS YES.

Facts of the case:

The assessees were cashew exporters, engaged in both export and domestic business. The assessee had returned income by claiming deduction u/s 80HHC. During the assessment proceedings, the AO noted that the assessee had effected high sea sales and earned substantial profit from such sale on import. Further, the AO found that the same was not includable in the business profits for permitting the assessee's claim. Further, to find that the eligibility was only "to the extent of profits derived by the assessee from the export of such goods or merchandise", the AO referred to the provision of Sec. 80HHC(1). Subsequently, the entire deduction claimed by the independent assessees were disallowed.

On appeal, both the FAA as well as the Tribunal directed the profit from high sea sales to be included to the total business profits and the turnover of high sea sales to the total turnover.

the High Court held that,

++ merely because the assessee is engaged in both export and domestic businesses and suffers a loss in export business, it cannot be said that the earnings by foreign exchange was inconsequential. The benefit of earnings in foreign exchange in the national perspective, occurs, irrespective of whether the exporter derived a profit from his export business or not. There cannot be any dispute that the export business, brings in foreign exchange into the Country; which is sought to be given an incentive. An assessee having both domestic and export business is also entitled to the benefit u/s 80HHC. This is precisely why the provision under sub-section (3) provides for the computation of the benefit at a proportion of the total profits from business, equivalent to the proportion the export turnover bears to the total turnover. The judgment in case of Parry Agro Industries Ltd. states that the profits of export business, separately maintained of an assessee having domestic business also, cannot be separately taken for computation u/s 80HHC;

++ reading the provision under sub-section (1), it is noticed that the incentive, is insofar as a deduction, while computing the total income of the assessee, to the extent of profits, referred to in sub-section (1B), derived by the assessee from the export of such goods or merchandise. As has been held in Parry Agro Industries Ltd., in computing the profit so derived from export, available for deduction, one has to take recourse to Sec. 80HHC(3). The computation of profits derived from export, for an assessee doing both export and domestic business, has to be made by resorting to the formula as available under sub-section (3C) of Section 80HHC. The proportion, which the export turnover bears to the total turnover, has to be applied to the business profits to elicit the exact amount eligible for exemption u/s 80HHC, as profits derived from export. As rightly held by the FAA, the business profits include those derived in the domestic market; that of high sea sales of imported goods, the turnover of which has to be included in the total turnover. This is the incentive permitted by the legislature, for earnings in foreign exchange, whether the export business generated profit or not. Therefore, it is held that in computing the deduction u/s 80HHC, the loss incurred in the export business would be of no consequence.

(See 2018-TIOL-817-HC-KERALA-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.