News Update

20 army men killed in blasts at army base in Cambodia3 Indian women from Gujarat died in mega SUV accident in USJNU switches to NET in place of entrance test for PhD admissionsGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand noticeI-T - Bonafide claim of deduction by assessee which was accepted in first round of proceedings does not tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars, simply because it was disallowed later: ITATIndia-bound oil tanker struck by Houthiā€™s missiles in Red SeaSCO Defence Ministers' Meeting endorses 'One Earth, One Family, One Future'RBI issues draft rules on digital lendingI-T - In order to invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263, twin conditions of error in order and also prejudice to interest of Revenue must be established independently: ITATCRPF senior official served notice of dismissal on charges of sexual harassmentIndian Air Force ushers in Digital Transformation with DigiLocker IntegrationColumbia faculty blames leadership for police action against protestersCX - When process undertaken by assessee does not amount to manufacture, even then CENVAT credit is admissible if such inputs are cleared on payment of duty which would amount to reversal of credit availed: CESTATGoogle to inject USD 3 bn investment in data centre in IndianaCus - The equipments are teaching accessories which enable students in a class to respond to queries and these equipments are used along with ADP machine, same merits classification under CTH 8471 60 29: CESTATUN says clearing Gaza mounds of rubble to take 14 yrsST - When issue is of interpretation, appellant should not be fastened with demand for extended period, the demand confirmed for extended period is set aside: CESTATBlinken says China trying to interfere US Presidential pollsWorld Energy Congress 2024: IREDA CMD highlights need for Innovative Financing Solutions
 
I-T - Appeal filed before Aaykar Seva Kendra and later transferred to CIT(A) would not be barred by limitation: HC

 

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, APRIL 19, 2018: THE ISSUE at hand before the Bench was whether an appeal against an assessment order filed before the Aaykar Seva Kendra and later transferred to the CIT(A), would be barred by limitation. NO IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case

The assessee, a trust, was assessed for two AYs, upon which duty demands were raised. The assessee claimed that the assessee appealed to the CIT(A) for both AYs. It further stated that while a stay petition was pending in respect of one AY, the appeal for the other AY was yet to be taken on file. Hence the present writ.

On hearing the matter, the High Court held that,

++ the Standing Counsel for the Revenue reports that the appeal for the AY 2015-16 was not filed before the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-19, Chennai on 15.02.2017, but, before the Ayakar Savakendra (ASK), which has been assigned as ASK No. 011150217021010 and therefore, it is not an appeal in the strict sense and the Department had forwarded the papers to the Departmental representative as there was one set of papers filed. Subsequently, it appears, necessary instructions have been given to the officials and the entire set of papers, which were filed before the ASK, has now been forwarded to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Coimbatore. A fresh problem has now arisen, i.e., if the appeal petition filed by the assessee is to be taken on file by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Coimbatore, would be barred by limitation. In fact, when the assessee has filed the stay petition before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on 14.03.2018, the same has been returned, since no appeal is pending in respect of the AY 2015-16.

++ in the light of the factual situation, this court is of the view that the assessee's right conferred under the provisions of the Act to file an appeal should not be foreclosed on technicalities. To avoid all technical objections being raised and to secure the interest of Revenue, this court is inclined to issue the appropriate directions. Thus, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the assessee to file a proper appeal petition before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in respect of the assessment for the year 2015-16, within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The assessee is also entitled to file a stay petition in the said appeal.

(See 2018-TIOL-728-HC-MAD-IT


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.