News Update

Indian Coast Guard intercepts Pakistani boat with 86 kg drugs worth Rs 600 CroreGold watch of richest Titanic pax auctioned for USD 1.46 millionIraq is latest to criminalise same-sex marriage with max 15 yrs of jail-termUndersea quake of 6.5 magnitude strikes Java; No tsunami alert issuedZelensky says Russia shelling oil facilities to choke supply to Europe20 army men killed in blasts at army base in Cambodia3 Indian women from Gujarat died in mega SUV accident in USJNU switches to NET in place of entrance test for PhD admissionsGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand noticeI-T - Bonafide claim of deduction by assessee which was accepted in first round of proceedings does not tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars, simply because it was disallowed later: ITATIndia-bound oil tanker struck by Houthiā€™s missiles in Red SeaSCO Defence Ministers' Meeting endorses 'One Earth, One Family, One Future'RBI issues draft rules on digital lendingI-T - In order to invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263, twin conditions of error in order and also prejudice to interest of Revenue must be established independently: ITATCRPF senior official served notice of dismissal on charges of sexual harassmentIndian Air Force ushers in Digital Transformation with DigiLocker IntegrationColumbia faculty blames leadership for police action against protestersCX - When process undertaken by assessee does not amount to manufacture, even then CENVAT credit is admissible if such inputs are cleared on payment of duty which would amount to reversal of credit availed: CESTATGoogle to inject USD 3 bn investment in data centre in IndianaCus - The equipments are teaching accessories which enable students in a class to respond to queries and these equipments are used along with ADP machine, same merits classification under CTH 8471 60 29: CESTATUN says clearing Gaza mounds of rubble to take 14 yrsST - When issue is of interpretation, appellant should not be fastened with demand for extended period, the demand confirmed for extended period is set aside: CESTAT
 
I-T - Claim of wrong presumption regarding status of payee will not earn reprieve for payer for default committed in withholding tax liability: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI , MAR 20, 2018: THE issue is - Whether mere presumption regarding status of Noida Authority as "Local Authority" will absolve payer from his negligence in not withholding TDS on payment of lease rent to Noida Authority. NO IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case:

The Assessee i.e., NOIDA SEZ Authority, had made payment of lease rent to Noida Authority during the relevant year, on which no TDS was deducted u/s 194-I. The AO therefore passed orders u/s 201(1) / 201(1A) for non-deduction of tax and also initiated the penalty proceedings. The assessee submitted before A.O. the details with explanatory note that TDS deduction was not applicable in the case of Noida Authority. The AO was however of the view that "Noida Authority was not exempt u/s 10(20) as it was not Local Authority." The AO therefore, held that assessee had no reasonable cause for non-deduction of TDS on the payments of lease rent paid to Noida Authority. He also levied penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for all A.Ys vide separate orders.

On appeal, the FAA noted that there was no dispute regarding not deduction of tax on the amounts paid as lease rent to Noida Authority. In response, the assessee submitted that this lapse happened because of the claim of Noida Authority that it was not liable for deduction of tax at source. The FAA did not accept this contention because the deductee could not influence the deductor in not following the law.

Tribunal held that,

++ the provision of Section 273B provides that penalty need not be imposed on the person or the assessee as the case may be for failure to deduct TDS, if the assessee proves that there was a reasonable cause for the said failure. The AO in the order u/s 201(1) / 201(1A), specifically noted the explanation of assessee in which it was submitted by assessee that assessee requested the Noida Authority to clarify their position whether their income is exempt, but, no reply have been received from them. Prior to it, the Writ Petition of Noida Authority was dismissed by Allahabad High Court. The AO therefore rejected the contention of assessee and passed the order for recovery of the short deduction with interest. The assessee in the penalty proceedings claimed that income of the Noida Authority exempt u/s 10(20), which fact was also not proved by the assessee because it was incorrect. Therefore, the assessee had been negligent in not deducting TDS on lease rent paid to Noida Authority without any justification. Since assessee failed to prove its bonafide through any relevant and cogent evidence, therefore, assessee cannot take benefit of Section 273B.

(See 2018-TIOL-402-ITAT-DEL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.