News Update

IAS Association condemns attack on Delhi Chief Secretary; demands immediate actionICAI removes name of O P Tulsyan from register of Members for five years in compliance with Allahabad HC orderST - Supreme Court agrees with Larger Bench CESTAT decision in Bhayana Builders - Revenue appeals dismissedCabinet clears bills on illicit deposit & chit funds regulations (See 'TIOLCorplaws')Cabinet nod for Tribunal on river disputeCabinet nod for bus bay near Indian Defence UniversityCabinet nod for coal mining methodologyCabinet okays Indo-Moroccan railway pactFive IRS officers appointed as CESTAT Members - Sanjiv Srivastava (Mumbai) + P Anjani Kr (Mumbai) + P Venkata Subba Rao (Hyderabad) + Bijay Kr (Delhi) + C L Mahar (Delhi)CBDT issues transfer order of four CITsI-T - Incriminating evidences obtained prior to date of search, cannot be roped in to make additions in case of unabated assessments: ITATPNB scam should pave road for financial transparencyBurdensome registration requirement under GST law be done away withST World Bank and International Finance Corporation are part of United Nations, therefore, there is no need to resort to definition of International Organization for extending benefit of notification 16/2002-ST: CESTATAnti Profiteering Application - An analysisCX - Merely on basis of statement given by one employee to police that raw materials worth Rs.2 crore were destroyed in fire, same cannot be taken as gospel truth: CESTATGovt keen to make agri schemes 'income-centric' rather than 'production-centric': MinisterKolkata DRI seizes 12.4 kg elephant tusk being smuggled from Assam to NepalDigital India successing becoz of people's pull: PMFish eats plastic & humans eat fish - serious health hazard: MinisterI-T - When assessee was only a licensee, not having exclusive rights over a property, vide unregistered document, it cannot claim to be owner of property for purpose of Sec 22: HCRailways relaxes upper age limit for Group C postsNo GST is leviable on goods sold/transferred while remaining in Customs bonded warehouseLeviability of IGST and as well as Compensation cess under Customs ActAG expresses concern over CBEC cases being dismissed by SC on ground of delayTime to shift focus from acronyms to gaps in performanceGST - Industry reports cumbersome procedures & high cost of compliance
 
CX - Components of boilers cleared as parts but essential to put into operation boilers, would be classifiable under SH 8402.10 @10% and not as claimed by Revenue under SH 8402.90 @ 15%: SC

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, FEB 09, 2018: REVENUE is in appeal before the Supreme Court against the CESTAT order 2017-TIOL-3596-CESTAT-MAD.

The issue is whether the essential components/parts of a boiler cleared by the assessee would attract duty under SH 8402.10 or SH 8402.90.

Heading No.
Sub Heading No.
Description of goods
Rate of duty
84.02   Steam or other vapour generating boilers (other than central heating hot water boilers capable also of producing low pressure steam); super-heated water boilers  
 
  8402.10 All goods other than parts
10%
  8402.90 Parts
15%

The adjudicating authority as well as the CESTAT held that though clearances were made and transported as components of boiler, the same were liable to be classified under sub-heading 8402.10 and not under sub-heading 8402.90.

Both the authorities relied on an expert opinion of the Technical Adviser (Boilers), Ministry of Commerce and Industry dated 12.09.2003 which mentioned -

It is a fact that the high capacity boilers cannot be transported in one lot to the site, therefore they have to be sent as individual item and sub-assemblies. Therefore, the parts which are essentially needed to construct a complete boiler may be considered under the term boiler. But the parts which are provided with the boiler to enhance the efficiency such as automation, data requisition, indicators, recorders etc. are used for ease and safe operation of boilers and cannot be considered as boiler parts.

By relying on the HSN note Part V under Section XVI, it was also concluded that such components which are essential to classify the boiler as a machine, even if transported as components, must be understood to have been transported as a complete machine. Therefore, levy of duty should be under sub-heading 8402.10 and not sub-heading 8402.90 as claimed by the Revenue.

The Supreme Court inter alia observed –

“7. ..., in the face of the opinion of the expert and the HSN note, details of which have been extracted above, we are of the view that the Primary Authority as well as the First Appellate Authority was perfectly justified in coming to the conclusion that the components of the boilers cleared as parts but essential to put into operation the boilers, would be classifiable under sub-heading 8402.10 and not as claimed by Revenue under sub-heading 8402.90. We, therefore, do not find any infirmity in the order assailed before us so as to justify taking of a view different from what has been recorded by the First Authority as well as the Appellate Authority.”

The Revenue appeal was dismissed.

(See 2018-TIOL-52-SC-CX)


POST YOUR COMMENTS