News Update

Ghana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsGST - Record does not reflect that any opportunity was given to petitioner to clarify its reply or furnish further documents/details - In such scenario, proper officer could not have formed an opinion - Matter remitted: HCED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in HaryanaGST - Mapping of PAN number with GST number - No fault of petitioner - Respondent authorities directed to activate GST number within two weeks: HCGST - Circular 183/2022 - Petitioner to prove his case that he had received the supply and paid the tax to the supplier/dealer - Matter remitted: HCGST -Petitioner to produce all documents as required under summons -Petitioner to be heard by respondent and a decision to be taken, first on the preliminary issue raised with regard to applicability of CGST/SGST: HCGST - s.73 - Extension of time limit for issuance of order - Notifications 13/2022-CT and 09/2023-CT are not ultra vires s.168A of the Act, 2017: HCSun releases two solar storms - Earth has come in its wayRequisite Checks for Appeals - RespondentInheritance Tax row - A golden opportunity to end 32-years long Policy Paralysis on DTCThe Heat is on: Preserving Earth's Climate in the Face of Global WarmingVAT - Timeline for frefund must be followed mandatorily while recovering dues under Delhi VAT Act: SCIndia, Australia to work closely for collaborative projectsCX - All the information was available to department in 2003 itself, therefore, SCN issued four years after gathering information is not sustainable and is highly barred by limitation: HCPowerful voices of amazing women leaders resonated at UN Hqs75 International visitors from 23 countries arrive to watch world's largest elections unfoldCentre asks States to improve organ donation frequencyCus - Revenue involved in the appeal filed by Commissioner is far below the threshold monetary limit fixed by the CBEC, therefore, department cannot proceed with this appeal - Appeal stands disposed of: HCAdani Port to develop port in PhilippinesUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awarded
 
I-T - Whether benefit of Sec 80P is available even to income derived from marketing of agri produce not grown by its Members - NO: Supreme Court

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, JAN 22, 2018: THE issue is - Whether benefit of Sec 80P is available even to income derived from marketing of agricultural produce not grown by its members. NO is the verdict.

Facts of the case

The assessee is a cooperative society. It derived its income from commission on sale of fertilisers and sugar on behalf of the Punjab Govt. It also dealt in agricultural produce. It also had income from house property, interest and dividends. In its return it claimed that income from purchase and sale of agricultural commodities was exempt under Section 81(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Authority did not allow the claim. However, in appeal, the Assistant Commissioner allowed the claim which was upheld by the Tribunal but has been reversed by the High Court in Reference.

On appeal, the Apex Court held that,

++ the provisions of Section 81(1)(c) of the Act was omitted by Finance Act (II) 1967 and was re-enacted as Section 80(P) which granted the exemption to the societies in respect of income earned from marketing of agricultural produce of its member. However, clause (iii) of sub-section 1 was substituted by Income Tax (2nd Amendment) Act, 1999 with effect from 1st April, 1968 by limiting the exemption only to the marketing of agricultural produce grown by its members. The validity of the said provision has been upheld by this Court in National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Limited and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors. It is not in dispute that the assessee is deriving income from sale of wheat, gram, maize, bazra and potatoes which can be said to be agricultural produce. However, these agricultural produce are not grown by its members but the assessee is marketing the same which is not the produce of its members;

++ we are of the opinion that the HC had rightly held that the assessee was not entitled for exemption of income under Section 80-P(2)(a)(iii) of the Act in respect of marketing of wheat, gram, maize, bazra and potatoes which were not grown by its members.

(See 2018-TIOL-21-SC-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.