News Update

International Road Federation calls for intelligent transport system to reduce accidents on Yamuna e-wayBihar Governor Satya Pal Malik receives additional charge of OdishaST VCES, 2013 is not an open ended scheme - benefits thereunder cannot be derived dehors scheme or after its life or duration has come to an end: High CourtReduced rate of GST on construction serviceI-T - Claim of wrong presumption regarding status of payee will not earn reprieve for payer for default committed in withholding tax liability: ITATRenewable Energy based on Waste - Lost its Power under GST!ST - Contract is primarily for transportation of sand and activity of loading/unloading is merely incidental - No tax under Cargo Handling Service: CESTATUS moves WTO against India's export subsidy schemesDoubling farmers’ income - Govt releases Draft Agri Export Policy; proposes to set up Agri Start-up FundIndia, Hong Kong ink agreement on avoidance of double taxation & exchange of tax infoIndia, USA focus on resolving MAP cases; Also wrap up two APAsOffences against Children - SC asks HCs to furnish details of special courtsI-T - Genuineness of gifts made under natural love & affection, should not be decided on touchstone of 'existence of occasion' and needs no prior sanction from Department: HCDomestic Tourist Visits jump from 128 Cr to 161 CroreRural Schemes - Expert Panel suggests measures to sharpen internal audit toolsNITI Aayog releases SATH-Education Roadmaps2G case - CBI moves Delhi HC against acquittal of A RajaIGST Refund - Shipping lines filing EGMs with errors, says CBECGovt about to finalise Sand Mining Policy; Delhi to host 3rd National ConclavePutin wins again; to remain in power till 2024India Needs Good Governance & Not New Law to Catch FugitivesI-T - Resultant profit out of investment in shares is to be taxed as capital gains even if intention of investor is not to earn only dividend income: ITATGST Council's latest recommendations - Part-IIST - Supply of (DMF)/(TECHPACK) to customers - since assessee is manufacturer of excisable goods, they cannot be treated as provider of Scientific or Technical Consultancy service: CESTATA Tale of Two Countries - And Their College Education SystemsCX - Debit note, arising from contractual liability, cannot be considered to be credit note relating to rendering of service u/r 4(7) of CCR, 2004: CESTAT
CX - Upgrade units though helps in enhancing capacity of computer but unit itself is not complete machine, therefore, it cannot fall under chapter 8471: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JAN 03, 2018: THE appellant is engaged in manufacture of Terminal and Computer upgrades/up-gradation and classified the same under CSH 8471.00 of the CETA.

Revenue viewed that the goods are correctly classifiable under CST 8473.00.

In adjudication, demand raised in respect of terminal was dropped. However, the adjudicating authority confirmed the demand in respect of computer upgrades/up-gradations.

The Commissioner(Appeals) upheld the O-in-O, therefore, an appeal came to be filed before CESTAT.

In the grounds of appeal, it is submitted that computer upgrades units manufactured by them are used to upgrade the existing computer system to enhance their memory, speed, storage capacity, printing capacity, connectively; that up-gradation is done as alternative to buying new computers; that computer upgrades units are assembled as per the requirement and to be added to an existing machine; that the computer upgrades unit itself are complete Machine and cannot be called as parts of computer, accordingly, the said product is correctly classifiable under CSH 8471.00.

The AR while reiterating the findings of the impugned order submitted that computer upgrades unit is fitted in the existing computer, therefore, upgrades cannot be called as new computer or complete system. Further, most of the parts of the computer are already in place in existing computer, therefore, the activity is re-conditioning of existing computer; the upgrades unit itself is not complete system, therefore, it is only sub-assembly and correctly classifiable under chapter sub heading 8473.00.

The Bench observed -

"5. We find that fact is not much in dispute that computer upgrades systems though used for upgrading existing computer but it is not complete system in itself. It is placed in the existing computer, the computer is classifiable under Chapter sub heading 8471.00 but upgrade unit is only one of the part/sub assembly and not being complete system cannot be classifiable as complete machine under 8473.00. It is admitted by the appellant that upgrade is sub assembly consisting of various parts which held in system to enhance its memory, speed, storage capacity, printing capacity, connectively. However, even after change of computer upgrades the other parts such as computer system, monitor, keyboard, mouse etc. are unchanged. In this fact, it is clear that upgrade units though helps in enhancing the capacity of the computer but unit itself is not complete machine therefore it cannot fall under chapter 8471.00…"

Holding that the impugned order is correct and legal and does not require any interference, the same was upheld and the appeal was dismissed.

(See 2018-TIOL-42-CESTAT-MUM)